Muslim stabs eight in Surgut before being shot

You have now.

I have the right to state my own opinion in here. And my opinion is that claiming genetic superiority over an other ethnicity is something the nazi's claimed with their Ubermenschen. And I will say it again and again, when I want to.

 

Fine. But if you keep stalking and labeling me personally because you personally are too uneducated or spiteful to understand that people can be interested in this subject without being a racist, I am going to report you to the Forum mods. Stalking is prohibited in here. I have freedom of speech too.

As I have already attempted to explain to you, if people of a specific ethnicity choose to inbreed, resulting in the matchup of damaged or dysfunctional genes, this is quite different from having "inferior" genes as a racial group. It is a problem they are visiting on themselves by breaking what in most cultures is considered a taboo--the incest taboo. If Mohammed encouraged or allowed this he was wrong.

I am aware of how the genetic concern of inbreeding some immigrant groups bring can impact on local school taxes. "Special ed" kids can eat up a major portion of school taxes in many US jurisdictions already...and in some European countries the incest-produced children of Pakistani immigrants are taking up most of the Special Education slots in the school systems already. Taxpayers need to be aware of the potential costs of bringing people with these practices into their cultures, whether you like it or not. It is fairly clear to me that if that happens, you would not be one of those helping to solve the problem it produced--you would be one of those on the sidelines criticizing whatever remedies were proposed.

 

And I'm perfectly in my right to when somebody claims to be of superior genes compared to others, than it's just textbook nazi ideology.

http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/166011.htm
I can't say it's true.

https://www.naldic.org.uk/Resources/NALDIC/Research and Information/Documents/RR757.pdf
The under-representation of all Asian groups and Chinese pupils for SpLD and ASD
The under-representation of all Asian and Chinese groups with respect to MLD, SpLD and ASD requires investigation
All Asian groups (Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi and Any Other Asian) are less likely than White British pupils to have SEN in relation to BESD, SpLD, ASD and MLD.

 

I agree it is difficult to isolate the necessary data in a politically correct country. Obama seems to have done the same thing to our statistical records.

 

The UK got a massive Pakistani community. And they are under represented.
I got 2 sources disproving your claim.
The odds that you just ranted a Islamophobic bigoted rant is sky high.

And lets not go cry baby alt-right on this. But just label for what it is.

 

Your first source was for one jurisdiction only and inconclusive, according to the summary at the end.

According to p 115, in the summary at the end of your second link:

"Bangladeshi pupils are nearly twice as likely to be identified as having a hearing impairment than White British pupils, and Pakistani pupils are between 2 – 2 ½ times more likely to be identified as having Profound and Multiple Learning Difficulties, a Visual Impairment, Hearing Impairment or Multi-sensory Impairment than White British pupils. The literature suggests a greater incidence of genetic factors related to consanguinity (where parents are blood relations) as an important factor in the over-representation of Pakistani and Bangladeshi children for these SEN categories. However, care must be taken not to over-attribute developmental difficulties to this factor. The Department of Health needs actively to address this issue and to develop a sensitive strategy to engage the community in a consideration of risk associated with consanguinity."

"Consanguinity" is a synonym for inbreeding, or incest.

Did you bother to actually read your links?

 

Yes, and during WWII they referred to all Germans as "Nazis", whether they were or not. It's possible to be a 'good' Nazi, a 'good 'Fascist' or a 'good' Muslim but, unfortunately, there's also a real possibility that they're batshit crazy.

 

Yeah... and that 1 is "just" London.
Do note... you originally failed to prove your point. You're dependent on me.
/facepalm.

Did you read that Asians (Indian, Bangladesh, Pakistani) are underrepresented in many other fields compared to white people?
I did quote them in my previous post. It's on page 40.

White people way more often autistic (more than twice as often), Behavior, Emotional and Social Difficulty (twice to 4 times), special learning difficulties (twice to 3x more often).

So much for your genetic superiority.


Tell me. Would you rather have Profound and Multiple Learning Difficulties a hearing aid, and glasses. Or be retarded and a burden of society, that can't control emotions and have trouble making friends? And who of these 2 is more likely to be a terrorist? Cmon.

 

The claim re. genetic superiority is your made up issue, not mine, and I already explained that to you. Inbreeding will produce defects in any population.

 

Correct.

https://pickeringpost.com/story/the-cost-of-islamic-incest/1316

 

Yes, religion is very very dangerous to the world.

 

That's because all of them have Islamic texts (that they refuse to change - that's tacit approval), that SAY TO kill non-believers (who stand in the way of implementing god's laws) and you'll get a big reward - Jihadists are promised the HIGHEST level in Jannah, so Islam glorifies killing people who fight for Allah in Islamic holy war. Listen to the the Jihadists and you'll understand.

"And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allah) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allah Alone [in the whole of the world]......" - Q8:39 (Mohsin Khan)

 

I'm afraid so. It makes climate change and global overpopulation sideshows by comparison.

 

Point is actually that you're assuming that this particular muslim has a defect due to inbreeding. And you're making this wild accusation based on his ethnicity with no proof. That racism you display goes hand in hand with the doctrine of the nazi ideology of untermenschen.

 

.

 

Two likes for this post so far, yet I have never once done as you say. Interesting.

 

We weren't talking about a particular individual.

 

Oh you're just dwelling totally off topic. lol
I think not.