My take on th Big Bang

Discussion in 'Religion & Philosophy' started by ronmatt, Aug 31, 2014.

  1. doniston

    doniston New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2014
    Messages:
    307
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It was honest answer to a simple question.but not irrelevant. this is a discussion and not everyone will either agree with you, or disagree. it comes with the territory.
     
  2. doniston

    doniston New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2014
    Messages:
    307
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It was an honest answer to a very simple questiojnh, but it was not irrelevant. this is a discussion, and not everyone will either agree or disagree with your opinion. It comes with the territory
     
  3. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I will accept you response in part as true. However, the portion regarding the relevance is another matter. You did admit that whether I believed you or not would not make any difference to your own level of belief, and to that point your question was irrelevant.
     
  4. doniston

    doniston New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2014
    Messages:
    307
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You have a very strange definition of irrelevant. perhaps strictly personal. No matter.
     
  5. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    The matter being considered was whether or not my belief or disbelief in your claims would alter your own beliefs.
    "ir·rel·e·vant ([​IMG]-r[​IMG]l[​IMG][​IMG]-v[​IMG]nt)adj. Unrelated to the matter being considered."
     

Share This Page