Myanmar ethnic cleansing half a million Muslim.. why is everybody quiet ??

So you fully support the rape of innocent children?

Most of these people have been living where they are for generations. I doubt more than a tiny percentage of them moved from anywhere.

 

How many posts were made about the Muslim atrocities against the Bhuddists including a full on war waged for decades against them by the so called innocent Rohingya?

I will never condone unnecessary violence against unarmed civilians but don't for a second pretend that the Bhuddists just woke up one morning and decided to kick out the Muslims because it was a slow day and they had nothing better to do. The Rohingya have been attacking innocent civilians for 50+ years where was your faux outrage about that?

 

...and still you pretend like christians are so darned developed, when the US intentionally overthrew a democratic government in Iran, then backed islamist extremists in Afghanistan just because they didn't like the sovjets, knowingly hindering the development of democracy in the Middle East?

When christians do that ****, they're not allowed to claim to be more developed than muslims.

 

WTF did Muslims do to these otherwise peaceful Buddhists to enrage them to such degree that they're now commit atrocities?

 

Well, the children who have been raped didn’t do anything.

 

You complaining about maybe 100 people who got killed on one side, while maybe 10.000's on the other side got killed, and 500.000 are fleeing for their lives, is quiet inappropriate.

 

How about asked those people who got raped why their houses got burned to the ground?

 

You mean the Bhuddists or the Muslims? Because the Rohingya and foreign Muslims raped and pillage as well. Are you saying that only the Bhuddists are doing this stuff or are you saying that Muslims raping Bhuddists is OK but Bhuddists raping Muslims is not OK?

 

I'm with the EU/US opinion that the Bhuddists are ethnic cleansing and raping to even murdering the Rohingya so they are fleeing out of their own country by the 100.000's. And you are like where exactly? With that Bhuddist government that like nothing of the sort is happening?

 

It's quiet inappropriate to worry about genocides when muslims commit them ?

And i would like a source about the 10 000 killed people.

 

Post your indignation about the violence committed against the Bhuddists. Otherwise you are nothing more than a opportunistic hypocrite. You are so upset about what the Bhuddists have been doing but you never said one word about the decades of violence including burning entire villages committed by the Muslims.

As I said I condemn any unnecessary acts of violence against civilians but unlike you I am not popping in just to join the train of hypocrisy. None of you were posting about Bhuddists being burned alive and raped. Now that its happening to Muslims all of a sudden its important enough to talk about.

 

Muslim atrocities against unbelievers is what has come to be expected, so doesn't make the news. Kind of like reporting on the sun rising.

 

How about "an eye for an eye"... "in kind"... these sorts of things?

 

That's what you said, not me. I don't believe in a nonsensical propaganda in order to sway the public opinion against the government which is not neoliberal friendly. I've seen it all before in the Balkans. A pack of disgusting lies in order to smear perceived enemies. Rohingyas moved illegally to Burma and now when they reached the numbers they want to claim the land. That's what Muslims do.

 

No, they did, not and they never do. But Liberals always looking for underlying “what made them do it”, when explaining and defending Muslims and heir atrocities.. don’t you?

 

So wait, there are less Muslims now than before because of Myanmar?

Thank you Myanmar, continue to do the world a noble but looked down upon service to our species.

No more generational inbreeding, no more executing gays for the lulz, no more subjugation of women.

 

It is inappropriate when there those muslims are the victims of a far bigger genocide.

Are NGO's / UN agencies allowed to have any access to that territory?
Stories of people being beheaded and burned alive are all over.
http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2017/0...ingya-Muslims-Rakhine-beheading-Boris-Johnson

 

And why do you offer ? Christian and jews flee the middle east, muslims kill non muslims in Europe, hindus are slaughtered in Bangladesh.

Even in countries like ivory coast or Senegal were muslims and christian are mixed up, the situation isn't easy.

Everywhere there is muslims, there is persecutions against non muslims. There is even persecutions against other muslims (sunni on shia muslims).

Why do you have as alternative ? Because I don't support to kill people, but I don't support either to let people kill you.

Do you think really that ISIS and Al Qaeda will stop anything in the rohingya territory ? Because some rohingyas are for Al Qaedas and ISIS, and there is no peace possible with them.

Not everyone can be a ballless european letting their children killed by muslims and still consider there is no problem with Islam.

 

More muslims flee out of the middle east than any other group.

Muslims are persecuted in Myanmar and in the middle east.
Even in the US,.. the amount of hate crimes against Muslims is sky rocketing.

ISIS and Al Qaeda play no role in Myanmar, and is certainly not the reason why these buddist are ethnic cleansing them.

The Jews and Christians kill far more Muslims.

 

I don't post that bhuddist are being burned alive and raped, because 99% of time it's those Bhuddists who do the raping, hacking to death, decapitating, burning alive, burning entire villages so 100.000's of muslims flee the country. Hence there is no hypocrisy.

 

@notme You didn't answered any of my question. You propose nothing and deny obvious facts.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rohingya_insurgency_in_Western_Myanmar

Rohingyas have the bangladesh, Burma people have myanmar. Muslims are totally unable to live in peace with other religious community. It's a shame people are killed in Burma (either buddhist by muslims, hindus by muslims or muslims by buddhists), but muslims are unable to live in peace with other communities, even with themselves (shia and sunni muslims). Muslims can only live in muslim countries.

 

Absolutely true. Look at India and Pakistan - they were once one country. But because of Muslims pretensions and violence they had to make a whole new country. And yet, the remaining Muslims in North India still stir trouble with the Hindus.

 

The only fact there is, is that the Bhuddists are busy murdering, raping muslims, burning their towns... so 100.000's of them flee their homeland.

You are parroting the pro ethnic cleansing regime of Myanmar.
As far as I know, no other country agrees with this.
Says a lot about how fanatically extreme your point of view is,... and wrong.

Ghana proves you wrong.

 

untrue

 

Actually the Muslims were living in peace in the secular government of Assad in Syria, and that's why we wanted a regime change and began feeding the Islamic extremists. You figure! The Russian Federation also has no problem with them. The only time it did was when the 'Takfiri jihadists' were sent into Chechnya from the Gulf states... with the help of the CIA of course. That caused the two Chechnyan wars. The intent was to sabotage the Russian pipeline running though Chechnya.

Russia entered the Syrian war to keep the Shia crescent intact, since that's what separates the extremists of the Gulf, from the moderate Sunnis in Russia. Israel in the meantime wants the opposite for its own security, it wants a boundary of friendly Sunni Kurds to separate Syria from Iran. Anyway the big fight is just beginning now that ISIS is being wiped out of Syria's oil and gas rich Deir ezzor area. Hopefully Putin and the King of Saudi Arabia reached some kind of solution... since the Saudis were one of the major players in Syria.

I know I'm off topic, but I couldn't help myself.