Near extinction of humans some 70,000 years ago

I meant the Ark was Noah's brain that had the world view into the days after the total extinction of all other kinds of man that would be and has been dominant ever since.


.

 

Your scale for human anatomy is all wrong. Pointed out before to you....

http://www.politicalforum.com/religion-philosophy/202355-creationism-schools-56.html#post1062269575


"that diagram shows the brain as being the same width as height. Whatever those bizarre "units" are, the diagram shows a brain which is in the ratio 30:30:50. In reality, the typical brain could be described as 30:45:53, or 20:30:36, which is notably different. Still, thats a minor point.

Length of human spinal cord = 450 mm (male); 430 mm (female)
Length of human vertebral column 710mm (male); 610 mm (female)

I'm not sure whether your idea of the "whole central nervous system" refers to the spinal cord or the vertebral column, or something else. If its the spinal cord, then these 300 "units" correspond to 450mm - thats 1.5mm per unit, which would make the brain just 75mm wide, which is way off. If it refers to the whole vertebral column then those 300 units are 710mm at best, which makes each unit 2.3mm, and the brain 69x69x115mm, which is still nowhere near enough.

In short: despite self-confessed fudging of the units, the measurements of your 'ark' are still complete bollocks."

 

Though I understand it is a common and accepted practice to extrapolate upon the scriptures, and has been done since they were introduced....I must say the imagination and effort you put into "Adjusting" the supposed words of God lead to a somewhat entertaining corruption of that which most Christians claim is sacred.

 

Oh,... definitely.
The Jews have demonstrated in 32AD how that attitude of establishing one's particular private interpretation of scripture can and does get the stamp of "sacred."

Sacred, used inthat regard, means "final."

Ancient men who clearly were corrected in 32AD will use "sacred" to mean "final" and give them the authority to attack peopler in the future, regardless of whether reason would dictate that much better understandings could be anticipated in the future, when knowledge abounds and more is known about the creation.

That the Truth about creation could never have been directly stated in 1362BC, itemized and enumerated as seven historical events which we now confirm in the geological record.

Who would have even understood that a Dark Cosmic Age was followed the Big Bang beginning, and the Universe had to await the flooding of visible light for 400 million years until the Stars formed?




Gen. 1:3 And God, (next, after the creation of the Heavens), said, Let there be light : and there was light, (which had been delayed by 400 million years after the Big Bang by a Cosmic Dark Age throughout all the universe).



Gen. 1:4 And (Father Nature, the Force behind the ever unfolding Reality), God, saw the light, that it was good: and (Father Nature, the Force behind the ever unfolding Reality), God, divided the light from the darkness (as the stars formed).

Gen. 1:5 And (Father Nature, the Force behind the ever unfolding Reality), God, called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night.

 

Wow....Just wow.

Truly, you have a dizzying intellect.
[video=youtube;D1n5CQe1krI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1n5CQe1krI[/video]

 

It just makes you dizzy because the whole new look back, at what Genesis actually says, absent the pre-set psychological concept that has become ingrained in your thinking by the culture in which Westerners are raised.

Peple THINK they already know the Bible to some extent, simply because of the religious paradigm they have been encultured with frm early on.Whole generations of young peple have never actually read the Bible, not comprehensively, and not alone to make of it what they might have, if not "assisted" by know-it-all adults selling a denominational church of one kind or another.


You probably never conceieved of the Big Bang as certification for "In the beginning," right?

 

Okay...now I understand.

Basically, what I have learned over the years of study, experience, and understanding should be dismissed because YOU know something the thousands do not.

Again.....WOW!

 

LOL

You know it too.

The correspondences between the facts that have come to light in this last century and each verse of Genesis are obvious.

The "In the beginning" and Big Bang Theory merely state thatthe Universe was not akways there, but peple just did not know that until 1940, when Hubble found evidence.

And until 1920, no one had a clue about Pangea:



Gen. 1:9 And (Father Nature, the first cause), God, said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, (Panthalassa), and let (Pangea/Rodinia), the dry land appear: (composed of the Seven Large Tectonic Plates):





1. North American Plate,
2. Pacific Plate,
3. South American Plate,
4. African Plate,
5. Eurasian Plate,
6. Anartic Plate,
7. Australian Plate),...

...and it was so.



BUT THE EVIDENCE HAS CAUGHT UP WITH THE BIBLE SO THIS GENERATION GETS THE MEANING RIGHT.
RIGHT?

 

Your ability to entertain has run its course.

IGNORE

 

Granny says, "Dat's good - now all we got to worry `bout is dat New Madrid earthquake...

Toba super-volcano catastrophe idea 'dismissed'
30 April 2013 : The idea that humans nearly became extinct 75,000 ago because of a super-volcano eruption is not supported by new data from Africa, scientists say.

 

So, the cause wasn't a super volcano last time around.
Maybe next time it will be.