NeoZionist murder of 400 kids commemorated in Gaza.

Not in the least. Thanks to the U.S. South Vietnam was free of Communism a full decade and the true horrors visited on the people of Indochina did not occurr until we withdrew.

I would prosecute the American congressman that refused to allow the U.S. to support the South Vietnamese govt. with military/economic aid and air power in 1975.

We ran away from our obligations to the South Vietnamese. This was the biggest disgrace for U.S. foreign policy post WWII.

 

Yes, thank you and goodbye;

 

Oh look at that... No american in the picture... Those are Vietnamese troop...

 

Wouldn't a self-confessed infanticide fanboy rather applaud another dead child ?

 

Some of the 504 Vietnamese civilians massacred by US troops at My Lai, March 16th, 1968

Would you care to withdraw your statement, Dayton3 ?

 

How is it anti-semitic to defend the rights of semites to fight? Jews are Semites every bit as much as Arabs are.

Secondly as to the "moved there volentarily" not really. Jews were never welcomed in Europe. Especially in the Slavic bloc, the population treated Jews about the way that the KKK treated American Blacks. That's not "moving volentarily" any more than Blacks in America volentarily moved north. It's just that when people fear for their lives they tend to flee. Calling that moving, that's a sick joke. I suppose you think the Tutsis just woke up one morning and thought that leaving Rwanda was a good idea, had nothing to do with the genocide. I suppose tons of Bosnians just woke up one morning and decided "ya know, I hear America is a nice place" and their leaving homes they'd lived in for generations had nothing to do with the Serbian offensives.

 

Would someone with such a limited intellect, as to not even be original enough to post an actual argument, know the difference?

 

Only 504... How many died at the hands of the reds...

 

God bless America, democracy and freedom eh?

 

better dead than red...

 

Yes, and thanks to the US over 180,000 civilians died during 'Rolling Thunder'. So, tell us again about these 'true horrors'. You left behind some nice mementoes of your visit too-unexploded mines, cluster munitions in the tens of thousands, and the after-effects of Agent Orange-all still killing and mutilating Vietnamese men, women and children decades after losing the war. Tell us again about the 'true horrors'.

You ran away alright; beaten and thrown out of Vietnam by the NVA and VC.
And then, to pile crass hypocrisy upon the horrors you perpetrated, America decided that financing, arming and supporting the arch-Communist Pol Pot; probably the most disgusting genocidist since Hitler, was a great idea.

Tell us again about 'true horrors' please.

 

I doubt that you know what communism is, when you parrot this stuff.

 

Lots of whining here. The communists of in Indochina killed many times the number the U.S. did but people whine because of U.S. actions.

See book "The Black Book of Communism".

 

<<< MODERATOR EDIT: OFF TOPIC REPLY >>>
The cold war was essentially a misnomer - a propaganda offensive used as a justification for US imperialist expansion of which Vietnam was a component part. The epithet 'communist' was a euphemism used against anybody who resisted US imperialism. Thus, the Vietnamese resistance was in reality nationalistic in nature as is, for example, the 'taliban' today in relation to Afghanistan.

<<< MODERATOR EDIT: OFF TOPIC/INSULT >>>

 

Oh sure, you ignored the Soviet Unions seizing control of a bunch of nations.

 

People 'whine' because, as usual, America blundered into a country and situation which was none of their bloody business. Not much has changed since-Iraq, Grenada, Iran, Guatemala, countless invasions, bombings, assassinations, government overthrows...you name it and it'll have American fingerprints all over it.

 

Yep, the same Soviet Union which America and Britain gave half of Poland to after WW2...

 

Completely and utterly irrelevant.

 

Seems relevant to me.

 

Not in the least.

 

Yes, it's relevant. Poland was a broken nation and so were those from which Russia forged the USSR.

 

So you are saying that the Soviets had a "right" to take and keep control of East Germany, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania, and Bulgaria.

Find that in the UN Charter.

No wonder you love those savages on the West Bank.

 

Nazis also accused Jews of being "savages". Yet, you still haven't explained why you believe that Israel is best represented with racist hatred. Why do so many Zionists seem to believe that Israel cannot exist without being heavily anti-Semite, as your position demonstrates? Why does Israel seem to believe that it must be a haven for Nazi racism?

 

Yes. The Allies were threatening to attack Russia , post-war , and those States required defending. Each of those States is now self-sufficient and Russia has withdrawn from them all. Zionism, of course, occupies for a different purpose- with America's backing.

 

That is complete nuts and you have offered no evidence whatsoever. There was not a single plan for attacking the Russians after WWII (except at best some idle musings by Patton and a couple of others perhaps).

Everytime I read one of your posts I'm going to remember that you claimed that

1) You are a JFK conspiracy advocate.

2) You think the Soviets after WWII were "protecting" those nations they conquered and brutally oppressed.

Pretty much says it all moon. Says it all.