They collected dust from a windowsill months after the event, kept it in a bag for a few years and then supposedly ran tests on it. They found paint. They also won't allow anyone else to examine the dust they 'have'.
I did. He invented the term 'nano thermite'. https://www.metabunk.org/threads/de...-9-11-wtc-dust-as-evidence-for-thermite.2523/ - - - Updated - - - Figures...
So to go along with the idea that 9/11/2001 was the most poorly documented disaster ever ..... was there not any official sampling of the dust from the "collapse" of WTC1,2 & 7 ? if so, what ever became of said samples? & BTW: there is a HUGE difference between Aluminum and Carbon Steel + what about the reactive qualities of these chips? Frankly .... while the debate rages over exactly what sort of incendiary or explosive was used, the facts remain that WTC1, 2 & 7 were destroyed by engineered events not the product of fires & damage. Go ahead and defend the 19 hijackers story .... whatever ..... not like it has any sort of foundation in logic & reason. not to mention the lack of foundation in the form of actual physical evidence.
Only thing is,9/11 was NOT the most 'poorly documented disaster ever'...How you can claim this is beyond me.
It don't matter which of the two stories or theories about building WTC 7 you believe, the fact is that two (or a 'neutral' stance) stances or believes caused an endless struggle. By simply putting a video online this endless struggle between both believers has increased, and the answers are more unclear than ever. What really happened to building WTC 7 will never be solved (because only a believer vs disbelievers struggle continues), same as JFK and the many other false flags or terror attacks. An endless struggle was always the result, and it will always be that way, simply because most people take a stance or side or start to believe propaganda or a story. The result of the collapse of WTC 7 was, not a clear answer, no indepth investigation and case, the result was an endless struggle between believers in two theories or stories, and a fewer that just don't know what happened, but are part of the same struggle. History is about struggling, and most people continue to do that, because they want to know the truth. The truth about 9/11 will come when we all stop our endless struggle, but we won't, it's in our nature to struggle, to survive, our still primitive behaviour will keep us in trouble. We simply continue to fight (is in our nature), look at the Scottish people for example, they believe what they see and hear on television, they are going to be part of the next episode of history, there will be no freedom, no independency, no truth. You have to stop yourself to stop history, but terror (fear) has increased our struggle.
Then please somebody produce official documentary photos of ground zero soon after the "collapse". and what about the official sampling of the dust that covered lower Manhattan? How about the documenting of the recovered aircraft bits from each of the 4 crash sites? NONE OF IT IS PRESENT! because 9/11/2001 is the most poorly documented disaster in history!
Just to address this bit "the answers are more unclear than ever." Really, the answers are VERY clear, the fact that WTC7 is seen descending at 9.8 m/s^2 for 2.25 sec + the fact that we have "FLT175" that penetrated a wall like a hot knife through butter. LAWS OF PHYSICS people! What we have here is the BIG LIE. Big Brother sez 2 + 2 = 5 ..... If I ( and countless others ) stop what we are doing, what will happen is the total take-over of AMERICA by a faction that has as much as sold out to SATAN. So what do we do? Stop trying & therefore the side that is sold out to the dark side will take control of AMERICA and then what? Please enlighten me as to what the plan really is?
So ... it's a holy crusade, is that correct? Bob, this whole tragedy was caused by religious zealots. I really think it's time to think more rationally.
You need look no further than the infamous "war between the states" to see more of the same, "IF WE DON'T PUSH BACK, THE AUTHORITARIAN NORTH WILL SCREW US" are you implying that if it can be defined as a "crusade" it is therefore automatically discredited? Please think about the position that you defend, are you quite certain that your evidence has a solid foundation?
in exactly what way "apples & oranges" ? May I cite an example of fanatic behavior by some nice white AMERICAN citizens, the history is there for you to look up, there were some religious fanatics who insisted that GOD told them to go blow up PLANNED PARENTHOOD. This is a true story and it illustrates the fact that there are fanatics all over. One of the problems with the propaganda today is that the idea is being promoted that somehow the ARAB fanatics are unique in their ability to be criminal. wow man, cruel & inhuman! or something. Its a propaganda war!
The alleged silent majority of architects who allegedly support the official story have not responded to: http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-s...edentialed-professionals-need-only-apply.html Think about it.
I hope you realise that was a fallacious response and does alter the false generalisation employed in the following: WHICH IS IMPOSSIBLE ACCORDING TO EVERY ARCHITECT AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEER ON THE PLANET... Anyway, back to your point about the debate, why should they? AE911T are cranks who have loaded the debate in their favour (read and comprehend the conditions). Think about it.
However, many of them have time to crank out totally bogus "papers" that allege the 19 suicidal hijackers story is true, but really all they are doing is degrading the whole "peer review" process!
Question, have you actually looked at the BIZANT paper + rebuttals ? or any of the other "scientific" works cranked out by academics in support of the perpetrators of this FALSE FLAG?
