No Boeing 767 impacted the South Tower on 911

I think troughers are angry that truthers know about the signatures LOL

 

Here's a slower motion clip of the right, left, right swerving blob. What a mess!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTt8cn8-awo

 

watch the starboard wing, you can see the already staircased (blown out) building mixed with the wing.




you also see a shadow from behind the plane transparency errm I mean plane when the sun is also on the right axially to that surface, not possible. Literally everything about it is wrong, but precisely what one would expect for hollywood, well its not even the quality of hollywood actually

the hezerkhani clip also is a signature clip, who ever did it does not know what this would look like in real life

 

You have no idea what you are talking about. There are only shadows to the left of the engine.

FAIL.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XELamUnF0EU

 

you have no idea what I am talking about. try again

- - - Updated - - -

yep thats where that came from LOL

 

Well... you said the windows were there, and I not only pointed out that they weren't there, but also indicated the representation of many plane components on the fake image that are different from a real boeing.

You said the fake black plane was a real boeing, but the fake plane clearly shows NO color pattern consistent with a real boeing.

When confronted with these points, you simply continue to post nonsense.

That's fine, but it's posted here using real and fake evidence for anyone to read and it doesn't matter if you want to deal with it or not.

 

Oops, need a new hypothesis?

 

Fisikz is fundamental, dude.

The impact was a couple thousand feet away. The fireball was well-evolved before the sound of the approaching plane and the collision would have reached him. The plane approached from behind the building. He would not have seen anything before he saw the fireball. Ther surrounding builidings would have baffled the sound. If he heard the plane approach, he would probably have conflated it with the fireball.

Learn how these things work before you start lecturing those of us who have had some relevant experience.

 

Give it a rest. There is a logo of the proper color clearly visible on the vertical stabilizer. The image is grainy as alll hell, but an analyst with a room-temp-or-better IQ can make out faint black dots of the right size running nearly the full length of the fuselage just over the wing and a row of lighter markings about half that long above that, ending just foreward of the wings. Immediately to the rear of the wing is a well-lit patch of brownish grey on the upper half of the fuselage that pretty much matches the United livery.

There is nothing strange abput the appearance of the engines.

You are confabulating (*)(*)(*)(*).

 

That's fake evidence with NO chain of custody. That's what you lunatics would do and that would put in the driver's seat of having to prove how it got there.

 

The right engine is too far to the rear and not much discernible. The left engine sags. You are bat (*)(*)(*)(*) crazy, trying to defend a black blob of (*)(*)(*)(*) with zero knowledge or ability to explain your jabber. You post nothing but silly denials.

 

who are you trying to kid LMAO

 

meh, that picture plus the ones you have provided debunk this entire thread. Not my fault you couldn't do a google image search before you made yourselves look stupid.

 

yeh and I have a bridge for sale, special deal just for you!

only a complete fool would believe that, just like the alleged engine, makes me laugh my ass off.

 

The people here who have actually examined aircraft wreckage have seen nothing odd about any of those artifacts.

 

You are going to have to do some really fancy confabulating to convince anybody of that. I see no anomly, and I have built a lot of aircraft models and worked around a lot of aircraft and watched a lot of them taking off and landing.

You are arguing from ignorance and nobody else here is that ignorant.

 

Do they still make and sell the old timey model airplane glue that smelled like glue should?

 

I still use Testor's tube glue or the brush-on.

I am begining to think that several others here use them, but I am not sure for what purposes.

 

I love the way troughers think they and their ilk are the only people qualified for anything

 

This thread really doesn't need to continue, the pictures provided already proved their conspiracy theory wrong. 2 seconds of google debunks this nonsense. Funny how you guys cry at pictures which disprove your crazy theories. What's the matter?

 

neither does your thermite thread since it was debunked a few hundred posts ago.

My participation in this thread only goes as far as what I post so drop the plural.

 

There's no hole to accommodate any large parts exiting tower 2. You can't prove a negative, only post fake evidence.

 

That piece would fit through any of the windows. Think for a change.

 

Not an engine, you know the one on Church and Murray.