No mention of the MAGA teen murdered for disagreeing with 41 yo?

Yes. The killer's claim, which is being examined by questioning those that knew his affiliations, is false. This was simply a young Republican man, who publicly voiced his views as he had every right to, and a Leftist who had bought the too many of the Left's lie that Speech = Violence, killed him for his Free Speech. And now this killer does not understand why this is a problem. He bought the lies from Biden, Harris, Pelosi, Hillary on down.

I had a poster on PF asked me if Clarence Thomas "wears a bulletproof vest" because this poster was angry about a decision joined by the Justice, and this was while another Leftist, fueled by too many of the Left's vile violent rhetoric, had just been prevented from murdering another Justice.

This is how Authoritarians operate, when they can't get their way through intimidation, they go to actual deadly violence, and all while claiming that it's 'the other guys" who are the semi-fascist.

No one misses the double standard:

INSTITUTIONAL RACISM: “Some in the Rowan University community are upset that a ‘self-identifying Black’ suspect who wrote ‘I hate (N-word)’ on a female black student’s dorm door isn’t being charged with a hate crime.”

No one is confused about what would be happening right now to Hunter and Joe if their last names were Trump rather than Biden.

No one is confused about what would be happening right now if the Killer was wearing a MAGA hat and the young dead teen was a Democrat.

Some leftists think they can avoid accountability if they just lie, deny, lie, deny, and lie and deny some more. I think they are wrong. We'll see in 43 days when the votes are counted.

 

There is no evidence that the murdered man was a Republican.

The police investigating it say that “I can’t get into details about what the witnesses are describing to us. But what I can tell you is that this is not political in nature at all,”. NOT POLITICAL IN NATURE AT ALL.


Yet you still think this is some sort of politically motivated attack.

No point in talking to you about it anymore.

 

When the KILLER says that IS the reason then yes, I believe them.
When police say something totally different (in a country where the DOJ and FBI has been weaponized in favor of the left), I do NOT believe them

When a president says on National Television that half of the country is a threat to democracy and calls them "MAGA REPUBLICANS" and some crazy left winger runs over a teen citing the SAME EXACT PHRASE then OF COURSE I'm going to put 2 and 2 together and think the speech has something to do with it.

You don't have to defend Joe on everything man, its tiring. You are allowed to disagree with Joe on some things and STILL be a democrat

 

The officer who made that statement has more facts than any of us.

 

The officer can read the mind of the killer? I didn't know that.

 

The officer who made the statement has more facts than any of us.

 

I didn't catch it the first 2 times. What was that again?

 

It's clear you don't get it.

 

Fake news. It doesn't say what you claim it says. You measure truth against the Left's narrative rather than objective facts, and as an American, you are free to do that, and I'm free to point out that you are doing it.

The officer is stating that the killer's claim that the teen is a Republican Extremist is not being validated by the evidence, and the officer is very likely right about this. He was just an innocent young man who freely stated his views, and he should be free to do as a Free Person, and he was murdered for it by a deranged killer who bought the vile Leftwing Narrative that Words are Violence.

We repeated warned the Left that this lie, that Words = Violence would result in Leftists murdering people for making them angry.


Leftist Killed the teen on the Left because the teen disagreed with the Left's Narrative and freely said so.

The badly injured young man, trapped and run over by the Leftist called his mom, but died before she could get there.



The Democrat Politician on the Left, brutally murdered the Journalist on the Right, because he published things that made the Democrat on the Left, angry. So, the Democrat politician, went to his home, lured him outside, and brutally and repeatedly sunk his knife into him until he fell down and died.

WE TOLD YOU WHAT YOU WERE DOING WITH THESE LIES THAT WORDS = VIOLENCE, THAT MORE INNOCENT PEOPLE WOULD DIE AS A RESULT. Endless denials of these facts do not change this. It does not bring the innocent dead back to life. They are forever dead.

What you can do, is STOP. And thank goodness the Right is not responding in kind. If they did, Biden and the Lawless Thugs of the FBI would engage in the brutal bloody crackdown, before the election, that they think is that last possible opportunity to avoid the coming election losses.

If the Right was answering this violence in kind our nation would be a standstill, but, as it is, you know as I do that they keeping their responses LAWFUL, and they are responding by hauling Leftists into Court whenever possible and in 6 weeks they are going to vote. And hopefully, that will be the beginning of returning to the LIBERAL CONSTITUTIONAL STANDARD OF

• ONE PEOPLE
• ONE LAW
• APPLIED WITHOUT FAVOR!

Face the Fact That A Free People have the right to disagree with the Left's Narrative and not BE KILLED OR THEIR LIVES DESTROYED FOR IT!

 

I posted the direct quote in English.

It says exactly what it says.

 

He's pretending that the officer is claiming to be able to mindread the killer and refute the killer's stated motive for the murder,
rather than,
Simply interviewing witnesses and refuting the killer's claim that this innocent and dead young man was a dangerous extremist.

 

It's says no such thing. You know it, I know it, and the American People Know it. You think you can change reality by endlessly repeating the Narrative, and you cannot. Reality refutes your Narrative.

 

I'm betting they have either been paid or threatened to go against a certain reason for this person's crime because it craps all over a certain narrative. (though I cannot prove this yet)

 

Bizarre claim. Guy runs over a teen and says he did it because he believed the kid was a "Republican extremist" and this cop declares as unquestioned fact that this "is not political in nature".

 

Well, it's not me making the claim. It's one of the officers who has interviewed witnesses and is working the case.

You will have to ask him how he got to that conclusion.

 

So you are choosing the "truth" that works best for your narrative?
I'm choosing what the KILLER said.
Not because of the narrative, because I believe a persons CONFESSION more than a democrat owned cop

I guess neither of us can TRULY prove the other wrong until the trial happens?

 

You believe that the North Dakota cop is working for the democrats?

 

Either he BELIEVED the kid he killed was a "Republican extremist", or, he was lying and thought his crime would be lessened by leading the cops to believe he thought the kid was a republican extremist.

 

Yes and no.
The FBI has the ability to investigate local police departments.
Democrats own the FBI.
Local police departments do not like to piss off the FBI

The above are my OPINIONS

Like I said, lets wait for the trial. I feel like we will just go in circles all day. You believe the mind-reading cop. That's cool with me. Hey, there is even a chance you are right! lets wait for the trial OK? Thanks

 

The officer isn't claiming that he knows better than the killer, why he killed the young republican. The killer's claim of why he killed is a matter of public record. What the officer is refuting is the killer's claim that the young man was an extremists, which by the way, wouldn't empower this Leftist to murder him, though obviously this Leftist thinks it's okay to act as Judge Jury and Executioner. The officer is simply cleaning up after the Killer's smear, and it's perfectly proper that he do so. I'm sure the young man's family appreciates that.

 

No. You are claiming the police officer is stating something that he isn't.

 

The Killer stated that he killed the young man because he was a Republican

https://news.yahoo.com › man-released-running-over-teen-113332690.html
Man Released After Running Over Teen He Deemed a 'Republican Extremist ...
Shannon Joseph Brandt, 41, was charged with one felony count of vehicular manslaughter and one count of leaving the scene of an accident in the death of 18-year-old Cayler Ellingson on Sept. 18.

How do you escape a murder charge for deliberately killing another for being a Republican?

'A North Dakota man who admitted to running over and killing a teenager says he did it because he thought the teen was part of a “Republican extremist group” that was out to get him, according to court documents.'

'According to a probable cause affidavit published by Law & Crime, Brandt told investigators he and the younger man had a verbal altercation about politics at a local street dance. “Brandt indicated that the pedestrian called some people and Brandt feared they would come for him,” the affidavit states. “Brandt admitted to State Radio that he punched the pedestrian and that the pedestrian was part of a Republican extremist group.”'

'After Brandt ran down Ellingson with his pickup, he left the scene and went home, but told police he later returned and called 911, telling the dispatcher that he “struck the pedestrian because the pedestrian was threatening him.”

'He then left again before first responders arrived, authorities said. Ellingson was found lying in the street and was rushed to a hospital, but he later died of his injuries.'

'His mother gave investigators a drastically different version of events, court documents show. She said the teen had phoned at about 2:41 a.m. to ask if his parents knew Brandt, which they did. He then called again a short time later and “stated that ‘he’ or ‘they’ were chasing him,” and after that she was unable to reach him.'

 

Nothing any witness could say would negate the killers statement to the police. And Id say either truthful or false, IT IS "political in nature".

 

Leftist extremist domestic terrorists are clearly the greatest threat in America today

 

There are plenty of things that could.

Suppose the murderer was out at a gay bar and got rebuffed by the guy he murdered earlier in the night, and witnesses stated that to the officer.

I'm not saying that is what happened, but that is just one of an infinite number of possibilities that could negate what the murderer said.