NSA Experts Say DNC ‘Hack’ Was Actually a Leak and Inside Job

Like I have mentioned previously the DNC email leaks being an inside job and not a Russian hack isn't going to go away liberals. No matter how hard you try to dismiss it label anyone that questions the Russian hacking narrative a conspiracy theory nut job and how much your liberal media ignores it

In the last week we have had a very respected veteran Pulitzer Prize winning investigative journalist proclaim that he has been informed of a FBI document detailing that Seth Rich was the DNC email leaker to WikiLeaks and now this

 

Okay. And?

 

LMFAO!

 

Oh oh.

**** just got real.

 

Sooner or later this Russian headfake will be revealed for what it is, and we'll be left looking at the Democrats and those who have been enabling this coverup.

 

I've posted this video of John McAfee before. Who is he? He wrote the book on cyber security, made a fortune selling virus protection. I've posted this twice. Result? CRICKETS!!! The LWNJ's go run and hide.

 

And? you cant be serious
for over 6 months we have had nothing from the liberal media but Russia this Russia that how Russia interfered with our election and how Trump colluded with Russia to make that happen
And when the truth is reveled that Russia wasn't the ones that hacked and leaked the DNC emails but an inside job the Russia interfered with the election and Trump Russia collusion narrative will be come the biggest fake news event ever it will then show that the Trump Russia collusion investigation is nothing but a sham a witch hunt that would make the Salem Witch trails look like traffic court

 

I am serious. I asked "And?". So now what? Is Mueller going to pack up and go home because this proves...I'm not sure? Is he going to forget about Manafort and Kushner not disclosing what they should have? Is he going to forget about Junior who "loved" the idea of collusion with Russia to help dad win. Is someone in the Justice Department going to investigate? What?

 

So no actual proof.

Yeah just like those huge Seth Rich FBI and Congress investigations going on.

Oops.

 

Well, if the DNC wasn't hacked, and had they turned over their server to the FBI that would have been verified, then the damage came from withing which legitimizes everything that got leaked. It would also put the DNC on alert to find the leaker, and if they found that person then it's my guess s/he was going to have a real bad day.

 

I agree with you. But what I was asking was basically now what? I wish I could care about how this would benefit the DNC but I don't. They deserve everything they get.

It still isn't going to stop the Mueller investigation. And it's still just opinions. Opinions of men with credibility, but opinions nonetheless.

 

like the bad day Sith Rich had?

 

Is this investigative journalist the same one who said Libya didn't really use chemical weapons?

 

Darn those IT workers!

 

It proves there was no Russia/Trump collusion to hack and expose the Hillary Machine for the inept, slovenly, corrupt cheating bunch of party leaders they were.

As for the others, I should think Mueller would submit his results and shut down the investigation.

 

It will discredit the investigation expose it for what it is a witch hunt because the used purpose for the investigation will be exposed as fake a lie
If you are investigating a bank robbery and during the investigation it is exposed that it wasn't robbed the money was just misplaced would you continue the investigation

 

How will it discredit the investigation? These men are saying the DNC hack was an inside job in their opinion. Okay. Mueller isn't investigating the DNC hack.

 

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...a-leak-and-inside-job.511852/#post-1067855323

 

Testimony under oath:

BURR: Do you have any doubt that the Russian government was behind the intrusions in the DNC and the DCCC systems, and the subsequent leaks of that information?

COMEY: No, no doubt.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that the Russian government was behind the cyber intrusion in the state voter files?

COMEY: No.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that officials of the Russian government were fully aware of these activities?

COMEY: No doubt.

<snip>

BURR: OK. When did you become aware of the cyber intrusion?

COMEY: The first cyber — it was all kinds of cyber intrusions going on all the time. The first Russia-connected cyber intrusion, I became aware of in the late summer of 2015.

BURR: And in that timeframe, there were more than the DNC and the DCCC that were targets.

COMEY: Correct. There was a massive effort to target government and nongovernmental — near-governmental agencies like nonprofits.

BURR: What would be the estimate of how many entities out there the Russians specifically targeted in that timeframe?

COMEY: It’s hundreds. I suppose it could be more than 1,000, but it’s at least hundreds.

BURR: When did you become aware that data had been exfiltrated?

COMEY: I’m not sure, exactly. I think either late ’15 or early ’16.

BURR: And did — did you, the director of the FBI, have conversations with the last administration about the risk that this posed?

COMEY: Yes.

BURR: And share with us, if you will, what actions they took.

COMEY: Well, the FBI had already undertaken an effort to notify all the victims — and that’s what we consider the entities that were attacked as part of this massive spear phishing campaign. And so we notified them in an effort to disrupt what might be ongoing.
Then there was a series of continuing interactions with entities through the rest of ’15 into ’16, and then, throughout ’16, the administration was trying to decide how to respond to the intrusion activity that it saw.

 

We have a left wing reporter, and named individuals reporting this information:

http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/bom...-dnc-hack-was-actually-a-leak-and-inside-job/

Four members of VIPS are currently concentrating on the task. They are: (1) William Binney, the NSA’s former technical leader who also designed many of the programs now in use by the agency; (2) Kirk Wiebe, a former senior analyst with the NSA’s SIGINT Automation Research Center; (3) Edward Loomis, the former technical director at the NSA’s Office of Signal Processing; and (4) Ray McGovern, former chief of the CIA’s Soviet Foreign Policy Branch.


First, VIPS noted, the NSA has the technical prowess to root out exactly what happened because their publicly known programs alone are capable of capturing any and all electronic transfers of data. As VIPS noted, “If NSA cannot produce such evidence—and quickly—this would probably mean it does not have any.”

That's already more factual information than we've received in over a year of our Russian scavenger hunt.

 

because the premise of the investigation was Russia was the hackers and did so to interfere with the election and Trump colluded with Russia in that interference
And when it is exposed that Russia was the hackers but it was an inside job leak it blows that premise out the window there for exposes the investigation as a sham especially if it continues

 

The entire basis of the investigation is the alleged DNC hack by Russians.

That was the justification. Without that tenuous justification, there is no basis for any investigation.

But of course, you know that already.

 

And surely you know that Paul Manafort's home was not raided because of the hacking of the DNC server. And surely you know that Junior's emails weren't of a concern to the Mueller team because of the hacking of the DNC server. Want me to go on?

 

What's interesting is I just realized that without the Russian tinfoil conspiracy, the Democrats are completely irrelevant as a party.

 

Digging holes looking for bones is not proof of anything.