Oh so this shouldn't be enforced it's just a good idea. Keep on pipe dreaming let me know when you fall out of your cloud.
You: I never said all reporters are alike. I just said it would be a good idea if reporters publish their political affiliations when publishing a political story. If they are so objective that shouldn't be a problem for them should it? I don't see how that would hamstring anyone unless, of course, they want to publish biased garbage and pretend to be objective. Frankly it's pretty screwball to believe all reporters are unbiased. The only pathological liars are the TDS ones...Like you. Oh so this shouldn't be enforced it's just a good idea. Keep on pipe dreaming let me know when you fall out of your cloud.Total lack of reality.
For me the fun part is watching the left run around like their hair was on fire over Trump being President. It's the most fun you can have with your clothes on.
Lol so now your stooping to total fabrication. I never said that I believed that.and I never implied it.. But I'll enjoy watching you squirm as you try to prove that I in any way implied or said this. . I guess were totally on your level now. In complete B.S. land.
If you think that's fun try watching a president who uses 1 syllable words to explain himself. Even more challenging try keeping up with Trumps mountain of B.S. that he regurgitates to the entire country on a daily basis. He could be even better at screwing over the country but his vocabulary is limited. Oh but it's probably easy for you since your on his level. Now let's watch you run away. Where is the proof of the 2million 800,000 votes that according to Trump are completely fraudulent in the past presidential election.? As they say in Monty Python when facing danger, "Run-a-way! Run-a-Way!"
Yes but you have to use cartoons entirely because you are totally incapable of defending and articulating any kind of defense for Trump with real words. Your post is a wordless failure.
I don't have to defend Trump, no defending necessary . I'm just elated we don't have the wicked witch.
Well you told me I was 'pipe dreaming' now you prickle at getting your snotty comments back in your face. But go ahead and keep running from the obvious truth that the MSM is left-biased. I await your next insult.
. You probably think like Trump that the 2million 800,000 votes he lost by are fraudulent. and without proof. So of course what's to defend? You've swallowed and inculcated all his hard line B,.S. and you don't know any better just another Trump puppet swallowing the cool aide. .
Why because I don't buy into your view of the media?!. Meanwhile you live in a total fantasy world and you insult your own intelligence with your silly ideas. You spent all this time debating your point and it all comes to to leaving it up to reporters to publish their private political affiliations. This notion is asinine and a true pipe dream. You wasted a lot of time on a point that turns on B.S. Here's you: "I never said all reporters are alike.I just said it would be a good idea if reporters publish their political affiliations when publishing a political story". I completely busted this point of view in a past post. But you left those details out. So tell me again who is it that can't be trusted??
Why is the thought that reporters should publish their political affiliations a pipe dream? Frankly, I would shun those that didn't. It's an idea, you are familiar with ideas aren't you? This is a discussion Forum and people opine lots of things. Why are you so intolerant? Why are you so insulting?
Lol because there are many reporters who publish stories straight up. Who try to be unbiased. Some people would simply look at there past affiliations and reject the article out of hand. You presume American readers are stupid and can't decide for themselves who or what they want to read. And who is the ultimate decider if a more liberal biased reporter (in your eyes) wants to proclaim himself middle of the road or slightly conservative. Who is the ultimate decider if a reporter wants to be seen as conservative even if they're not( in your eyes) Not only that you have no right to tell someone they are a liberal if they deem themselves conservative that is their right. What are you going to do have a news policeman arrest him. Your idea is unwieldy, impractical and presumes the American people are stupid. .We have the right to a free unfettered press a traditional American idea that should never be curbed. Lol you presume to save the American People from themselves. That idea is disgusting and gradually leads us to a period where others outside the press would try to control it; maybe some dumb azz who's name rhymes with stump. . You said this should be voluntary. Good luck lol.
Keep soaken up the orange cool aid. Lol only a moron like trump would have a special consul looking into his affairs in only just a few short months as president. And all this with a Republican Congress teetering in the brink. Who knows how deep this butt hole will sink and take his brethren in Congress with with him. They really are worried about this lying scheming but thole. He's a record breaker all right you can't deny that. No president in history has sunk so low so fast.
No I think American readers deserve to know the bias of their reporters. Why do you want to hide that? It's obvious that most of the MSM is liberal biased but they purport to be objective. This is a lie. \ The ultimate decider is the consumer. If reporters started publishing their political affiliations with their political stories more people would read them. You have gone of the deep end now. Frankly it's disgusting when so-called objective reporters can't keep their political views in check. "Lol"
Don't get bit from behind when you leave. Remember your favorite President will strike at his strongest supporters if provoked.
Have you ever seen sour grapes and stomping feet like children before like this in your life? It's pretty sad. I need to stop lowering myself stooping to their level.