He hasn't supported anything. His entire argument is based on bull(*)(*)(*)(*) logic. He's basically arguing that since chihuahuas are dogs all dogs are chihuahuas.
Just as in Iraq and Afghanistan why doesn't he simply decree victory and get out? The time for the nation to make good decisions passed when we elected the One the first time. It is too late. Let them kill one another without our help.
I like how you are attributing all the dead to Assad, as though the al qaeda sunni muslims have no blood on their hands. That said, pretending that Obama,and the Obama/Clinton State Dept. have not OVERSEEN/CAUSED the greates drop of prestige, power and respect for the US in HISTORY, even worse than under Carter, is just ludicrous. We have deposed two of our ALLIES, in the crucial nation of Egypt,and in Libya, enpowered terrorists, armed them with Qhaddafi''s military's weapons, and now have ZERO power , anywhere, and continue to facillitate our enemies. All by the SAME PEOPLE who opposed deposing SADDAM HUSSEIN, who was our ENEMY. Astounding ignorance, naivete,and just plain old STUPIDITY....
You literally have no clue what you are talking about, lol. It's hilarious how this is one issue where it's pretty much bi-partisan in the fact the rebels need help, but because Obama is President you are all pretty much Assad supporters with out even the slightest clue what is going on in Syria other than couple blogs that show gruesome instances. The rebels aren't a bunch of hippies looking to hold peoples hands. They are crazy just like Assad's supporters, who have been burning down villages, over 4 million women and children are displaced. You act like Assad is some saint, lol. You guys hate Obama so much that you will literally choose the opposite side of everything he does, it's hilarious.
I have no love for Assad, who helped Saddam Hussein stash his WMDs, IMO, nor have I expressed a shred of support for him. We should have deposed him ALONG WITH Saddam Hussein. THIS is what I ACTUALLY posted, after you posted THIS: (Note: "60,000 " was the estimate of the TOTAL DEAD, in the Syrian civil war. You DID attribute ALL OF THE DEAD TO ASSAD, which is complete, and total BULLCRAP,as I CORRECTLY CLAIMED. Speaking of "not having a clue what you are talking about"...) Care to respond to that, instead of your blathering about what I DID NOT SAY? Nice attempted DODGE of being busted on the TOTAL LIE you tried to float by. The "rebel", AKA; TERRORISTS are responsible for a SIZABLE number of deaths in Syria as well. Helping al qaeda will NOT lower the death toll. Make up some more nonsense.
It's just another one of those fantastic CIA operations that always work out so well. They swear that this one will be a success.
You claimed that every Syrian rebel was our enemy. I ask again, are the Christians among the Syrian rebels our enemy?
Ask all you want. I do not believe I said every Syrian rebel was our enemy. I do remember saying that we have no role to play. The few articles I skimmed show that the Christians comprise about 10% of the country's population and believe their survival is tied to Assad's survival. There are plenty of people involved. We have no role to play. They are all our enemies and we should let them bleed each other white. The Christians are in a tough place. As are all of the others.
No. Just because there are a few people on one side or the other does not mean we have a role to play. Would you feel better if I worded it some other way? All of the groups who are fighting, whether they contain Christians or not are our enemies. Whether they are part of the rebellion or part of the government makes no difference.
Seems so, Obama hasn't said a word about the burning of churches and genocide of Christians in either Syria or Egypt by AQI or the Muslim Brotherhood.
Then it shouldn't be too hard to list the 'good' rebels from the 'bad' rebels, and provide evidence of which ones do or don't receive US arms...
I don't have a private intelligence service with the HUMINT and SIGINT capabilities to track every Syrian rebel group nor do I have access to the classified documents showing where current US funding and arms go. However, neither do you. So you cannot show that we are arming Al Qaeda.
Perhaps, but an administration that was facing such accusation s might well have an interest in clearing such things up...
Thats super awesome, but obama says he needs to spy on all Americans to protect us from the people hes giving weapons too. Seems kinda idiotic if you ask me. - - - Updated - - - He cant "clear them up", and thats why its a secret CIA sponsored invasion of Syria..... Maybe obama shouldnt give em man-pads, but instead give em airplanes so they can fly em into syrian buildings....
What difference does it make how many people he kills? How many people need to die before it becomes necessary to intervene? I call BS on your looney logic.
That would require them to release exactly who our weapons are going to, which could open those groups up to attacks by Al Qaeda. Which is more important, making Rightwingers who are going to hate the administration anyways happy or ensuring the rebel groups they are supporting stay alive?
Al Queda wont attack themselves..... duh.... Obama’s Libyan War Feeds Guns into Al Qaeda’s Syrian War
Ah yes...the idiotic assumption that the Syrian rebels are a single homogenous body as opposed to small disparate groups.
So you think its cool if we give the Al Queda portion of the syrian rebels aid and comfort, as well as weapons?
That's how Israel wants it; that's how it will be. Ask yourself, is Assad threatening Israel now? Chaos and anarchy are the end games here.