Oh, is that all? Gee, I thought we were going to have a seance......phooey...

Discussion in 'Religion & Philosophy' started by Bishadi, Mar 15, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Bishadi

    Bishadi Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    12,292
    Likes Received:
    52
    Trophy Points:
    0
    by Whatnow?!

    I couldnt help it........


    What do people expect from their religion, ultimately?

    What is it that each expect to achieve for believing?


    no seances!!!!!
     
  2. gabriel1

    gabriel1 New Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2012
    Messages:
    3,789
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    knowledge
     
    Bishadi and (deleted member) like this.
  3. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    What kind of 'knowledge'?
     
  4. gabriel1

    gabriel1 New Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2012
    Messages:
    3,789
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    answers to why, how and what
     
  5. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    "answers to why, how, and what" about what?
     
  6. gabriel1

    gabriel1 New Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2012
    Messages:
    3,789
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    existance
     
  7. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Oh! I get it... you mean 'when something IS'.
     
  8. gabriel1

    gabriel1 New Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2012
    Messages:
    3,789
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    or was, or will be
     
  9. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    'was' is past tense and indicates something that no longer exists; "will be" is future tense and indicates something that does not currently exist but might exist in some future time. 'is' is present tense and indicates something that exists in the here and now.
     
  10. gabriel1

    gabriel1 New Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2012
    Messages:
    3,789
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    yep. well done
     
  11. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Yep, well done. I agree. Just goes to show that you probably don't even know what it is that you are looking for, especially when you seemingly did not know the difference between "is", "was", and "will be". Remember, your response to my inquiry about what type of knowledge you were looking for was "existance" (existence). "existence" refers to the here and now [present time] unless specified with such terms as "past" or "future"
     
  12. gabriel1

    gabriel1 New Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2012
    Messages:
    3,789
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    wrong, things had an existence in the past and will in the future. existence is a noun , not a verb.
     
  13. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Did I say anything about 'existence' being a verb? No? Dude,, you need to pay attention to what is written.
     
  14. gabriel1

    gabriel1 New Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2012
    Messages:
    3,789
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I did and I don't agree that the word existence deals only with the present unless otherwise specified.
     
  15. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    The above statement is a blatant untruth. You previously stated "wrong, things had an existence in the past and will in the future." where you specified future and past with reference to existence. You are now offering conflicting responses.
     
  16. Bishadi

    Bishadi Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    12,292
    Likes Received:
    52
    Trophy Points:
    0
    funny....

    what is 'alpha/omega' other than beginning/ending of existence.

    Idiots call it a god!
     
  17. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You know I have to agree with your opinion on that one. I recall someone on this forum not too long ago make reference to existence being not just 'a god' but rather 'god.'

    At any rate, to answer your question, the "alpha/omega" is two words joined together (or separated) with a forward slash.
     
  18. thebrucebeat

    thebrucebeat Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    10,807
    Likes Received:
    79
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Another potentially interesting thread derailed by the great rhetorical masturbator.
     
  19. Bishadi

    Bishadi Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    12,292
    Likes Received:
    52
    Trophy Points:
    0
    that's been me, since day one.

    And the name of god is the math defining the process of the trinity (mass, energy, time).

    and 'god' is just 'dog' spelled backwards.

    Man created the dog and your god.

    But the truth is, nature itself, is your everything (god itself).

    Like it or not!
     
  20. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I sort of figured I was correct in that recollection, but I am glad that you owned up to it. However, you still have not proven that the 'trinity' is "(mass, energy, time)" nor have you proven that "existence" is "a god" or even "god". Where is the PROOF of those claims?


    How silly. Don't you realize that those two terms have meanings that are not even closely related? Go check it out in a dictionary is you doubt what I am saying.

    Man may have created the words 'god' and 'dog', however man did not create that four legged creature known to some as the 'dog' or Canis familiaris.

    There is that same ole presumption you made earlier. You still have not proven that "nature" is my "everything". You are still needing to do a lot more research in order to PROVE that claim.

    Like what or not?
     
  21. Bishadi

    Bishadi Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    12,292
    Likes Received:
    52
    Trophy Points:
    0
    sure i have

    I have more posts in the science section, than perhaps any poster on the forum. Of nature, i have more time in the field of comprehending life, than you have spent eating hot meals, for your whole life.

    already proved it to you. You are born within 'the garden'/nature/existence itself and any divergence from that fact, is a lie.

    sure they are.

    manmade the dog and it begs, submits, and is almost completely reliant on man.

    Man basically created a beast, that does what a religious wingnut thinks a god wants.

    like man, the canis evolved from its previous lineages

    but unlike a religious wingnut, the honest human beings, already know that!

    no i dont


    I will do as I please and make a fool of the liars, knowing they are a disease.
     
  22. Casper

    Casper Banned at Members Request Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2012
    Messages:
    12,540
    Likes Received:
    72
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I expect nothing and hope for peace and get it.
     
  23. Bishadi

    Bishadi Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    12,292
    Likes Received:
    52
    Trophy Points:
    0
    funny.....

    jesus supposedly died on a cross and rather than go back to the pilate and rabbid and say, 'hey, im god, you cant kill me' .... he just left town.

    If i had published 30yrs back, i would probably have warren buffett doing my accounting, gate my IT man and martha stewart in the kitchen and streisand as my gardener.

    You would be my dog

    Money and power is not what i pursue or I would own you!

    science is about reality, Religious opinion renders that morons that are still lying to people

    above and well beyond any religion

    Science is based on the commitment to truth, not a belief



    have you ever been on the streets and told somebody that 'god spoke to' you?

    They would take you shoes, your wallet, and then they may physically rape you...... simply because if a human is willing to lie to people on such matters, they are a worthless life to the majority on the earth.
     
  24. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    If grasshoppers carried 45's, birds would not mess with them.

    So you don't hold a belief in science?

    Day dreamer you are.
     
  25. elijah

    elijah New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2010
    Messages:
    4,173
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Thats just hilarious.......you have those fits and delusions of grandeur often....LOL!!!!

    - - - Updated - - -

    Whats that old saying about "if a frog had wings".............
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page