One of the more consequential cases to be decided.

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Lee Atwater, Mar 2, 2021.

  1. MJ Davies

    MJ Davies Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2020
    Messages:
    21,120
    Likes Received:
    20,249
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Let me know if you are ready to discuss this at some point in the future.

    In the meantime, this is an interesting read.

    https://mountainscholar.org/bitstream/handle/10976/167561/Malazada_uccs_0892N_10535.pdf?sequence=1

    Image7.jpg
     
  2. Cybred

    Cybred Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2020
    Messages:
    20,900
    Likes Received:
    7,683
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Prove it.
     
  3. Lee Atwater

    Lee Atwater Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2017
    Messages:
    45,975
    Likes Received:
    27,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Whoops. We all have over arching beliefs built on a foundation of smaller ones. Just like a house's foundation that reveals itself to be weakened by faulty material so too our larger belief system can be defective if it's based on fallacies. Dismissing the Russia investigation as a hoax (or the impeachments) is one such defect. It leads to others. Before you know it, your whole foundation is filled with holes.

    Like the gaping hole in your foundation caused by thinking the impeachments were phony. When in truth the acquittals were phony since they ignored the overwhelming evidence of Don's guilt recognized (the second time) by a bipartisan majority.
     
    Indlib likes this.
  4. Lee Atwater

    Lee Atwater Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2017
    Messages:
    45,975
    Likes Received:
    27,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Once in a while the cat gets out of the bag. It happened when Kevin McCarthy admitted the Repubs were holding hearings on Hillary because they were trying to knock her poll numbers down. It happened when Vlad's favorite candidate told the Russians he was meeting with in the Oval Office he fired Comey to "relieve pressure" from the "Russia (investigation) thing."

    It happened again.

    In Supreme Court, GOP attorney defends voting restrictions by saying they help Republicans win

    An attorney for Arizona's Republican Party offered a blunt reason for his presence defending the state's voting restrictions before the Supreme Court on Tuesday: The measures disadvantage Democrats.

    The Supreme Court is hearing arguments over Arizona voting restrictions in a pair of consolidated cases challenging a state law banning ballot collection and a policy that tosses ballots cast in the wrong precinct. Democrats have sued, saying the rules discriminate against minorities and violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/el...voting-restrictions-saying-they-help-n1259305
     
    AZ. likes this.

Share This Page