One suspect dead, 9 injured after attack at Ohio State University

Do you disagree?

 

Aw, dude...
9 people injured, and the attacker did not use a gun.
Better luck next time, eh?

 

oh i see he wanted to be one of those libreal arts professors

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...rant-identified-attacker-ohio-state/94563226/

 

i was wondering why not a gun? knives and swords are very traditional in Somalia
heres some old daggers used by the women in war
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_of_Djibouti

 

heres what a tradition straight knife Somali warrior looked like

 

I guess you didn't read the attached article which displayed the tweets of people like Shannon Watts of Soros funded group Moms Demand Action and Senator Tim Kaine (you do know who he is, don't you?) calling for more gun control without waiting to find out that the assailant used a car and an knife.

So which side jumped to conclusions before the facts were in?

 

Yes, most religions have some parts that are hard to accept on any other basis than faith. Take the "global warming" religion, for instance. Despite 25 years of warnings that we only have 5 years to fix the problem, which never seems to actually be a problem, they keep making those 5 year predictions. Faith.

 

D. an ********

 

I don't agree that every time an act of terror happens it validates the idiocy that spews forth from trump.

 

What a load. The vast majority of those involved in the gun deaths in the US are Democrats.

 

I think those people have been calling for gun control before this latest incident. I'll read fox news when i'm old, scared and senile. That's their target audience anyways.

 

BAN GUNS!!! Wait, what's that? It was a car and a knife? You've got to be... BAN GUUUUNNS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

And that attitude is why Trump won, and Hillary supporters were so surprised and shocked. Don't examine any sources other than those that agree with you. Don't look to see how the other guy thinks. Inside the bubble everything, outside the bubble, nothing. How did that work out?

Anyhow. However much those idiots have called for gun control in the past, it reveals their stupidity in calling for more gun control after a knife and car attack.

 

Huh. you think that people who want gun control should keep quiet unless there is a gun attack? You will then accuse them of using someone's death for an agenda and not caring about the victim!

 

Which is, of course, true.
Why do we only hear about the "need" to "ban" 'assault weapons' is after one of used in a shooting?
Never let a good tragedy go to waste; nothing is more tragic than the blood of innocent children.

 

Huh? "only hear" + "after". Have you bothered to read these posts - the post was that they were 'stupid people' for saying that the "need" to ban 'assault weapons' without any shooting occurring

 

They -were- stupid for doing so and should be embarrassed of themselves.
This does not change the fact the only time you hear from these people is when there is a shooting - or when they think there is a shooting - where fresh blood can be used to push their agenda.

 

There are several shootings every hour of the year in the US. There are no gaps in the shootings to be able to state that you want stricter gun controls during a time when no shootings occur

 

With "assault weapons'?