opinion poll: is the obama administration corrupt ?

Nixon wasn't a pathological liar like Obama. Obama's biggist lie to date: "...I will support and defend the Constitution.." Add that to every anti-Christian law and executive order to spew forth from him.

If he hasn't supported or defended the Constitution, surely you can come up with some evidence. But, alas, either you cannot or you have gutless leaders. So sad.

 

Seriously, you can't come up with one impeachable offense you can support??? You don't think the judicial process or all those Republican members of the House would impeach him if they had anything that approached a misdemeanor, let alone a high crime? It could be that the Republican House members are more idiotic than you, but I seriously doubt it.

 

So you've got nothing as well?

 

Obama should be impeached for presenting a phony BC, for Benghazi, for lying about Obamacare and the EOs to change the law. The House can make strong cases, but they will not since the Senate will not convict. No evidence will convince the likes of you, so I won't waste time.

 

While I agree with you it's not just the government that is corrupt, I do not agree with that we need more laws. I do not see how having more laws from a corrupt system will make it any less corrupt.

 

LMFAO. Sorry. Scooter, I couldn't read any further.

 

We're going to have to have thousands of very specific laws covering very specific infractions, and we're going to have to enforce them, or we are going to continue to have massive corruption. Take your pick. Can't just wish and hope for corruption to go away.

 

Obama didn't present a phony BC, and he hasn't committed a crime in order to be impeached.

 

You and the truth continue to be far apart!

 

google "Obama birth certificate", you may be astounded.

At the amount of stupidity the birthers not only show but are proud of.

 

I don't think they believe even 10% of what they say but they do know the truth doesn't win elections. You gotta give 'em some amount of credit for that.

 

Then by all means, present your evidence.

 

I have never seen any valid evidence presented by yourself. Until then, my opinion and many others' opinion trumps you.

 

It is not up to him to present evidence that there has been no crime, it is up to you to present evidence that there has. Until then, your opinion doesn't trump squat.

 

I disagree.

 

Lol, you're pathetic...........http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf

Now, provide your evidence it's phony or your evidence he's committed a crime.

- - - Updated - - -

Which is why birthers are morons.

 

Any American administration is somewhat corrupt. simply because we accept corporations as "people". Corporations can by legislators and twist existing laws. Obama's administration is much better then Bush's. After all. he was elected despite Koch Brothers.

 

Absolutely corrupt. Just because suits have not been brought against them, yet, does not mean the criminals did not do the crimes.

 

Non-Birthers are ostriches! So gullible also!

By the way, it's amazing 13 posters believe the Obama Administration is not corrupt! Geeez!

 

Ahhh, I see. You like the N. Korean model.

 

not as corrupt as bush/ cheney or Reagan administration.... bush/cheney got over 4000 servicemen killed in Iraq war... and where did the oil go to...did we get any to pay back the war.....or make our oil prices cheaper......hello out there you are talking about the wrong president

 

Not true! The Iraq War was a bipartisan effort. It was caused by 9-11 which was caused by the ineptness of the POTUS in the nineties!

 

For those who may have forgotten these long-ago events, Mr. DeLay was first accused by Mr. Earle, the chief prosecutor of Travis County, Texas, of conspiring to violate Texas campaign laws. That indictment immediately was challenged because, even if there had been sufficient evidence of wrongdoing — which there emphatically was not — it would have necessitated prosecuting Mr. DeLay for violating a law that had not yet been passed at the time he was alleged to have broken it, a clear violation of the constitutional ban on ex post facto prosecution.

If I'm reading this right, DeLay's first trial was in TX and his conviction was overturned in a TX court. So, what's the "game being played?"

[DeLay's] defense team’s complaint alleging criminal misconduct on the part of Ronnie Earle is persuasive. Unhappily, the same Democratic single-party rule in Travis County (Austin and environs) that allowed Mr. Earle’s circus of a case against Tom DeLay to proceed in the first place ensured that he was never held to account for his gross and shameful abuse of the public trust. Mr. DeLay did not earn his nickname, “The Hammer,” for being a nice guy, but the attempt of Texas Democrats to criminalize politics, and the decade-plus persecution of Mr. DeLay that resulted from it, is an act of corruption in the most literal sense of that word, eroding the legal and political institutions that enable democratic self-rule in a constitutional republic.

Was it really your intent to post an example the ways that Democrats are corrupt?

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/359032/delays-vindication-texass-shame-editors

 

more than two to one corrupt. I should run a poll of whom among us voted for him. how many times.

community organizer.

 

Aren't they all?
All governments have been corrupt since the beginning of time.
They have all been basically parasites.