Our Constitution Belongs to ...

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Foolardi, Oct 26, 2019.

  1. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    already established you don’t know what this means.


    It isn’t a buzzword.

    again, reality is in direct opposition to this claim. Interracial couples could not marry. That’s why we have a Supreme Court case called loving v virginia.

    The 14th amendment precludes bans on interracial and same sexual couple marriages. It’s in plain English.

    Again reality is in direct opposition to your statement. Same sex couples can and do marry in all 50 states.

    The 14th amendment precludes same sex marriage bans. It’s in perfectly clear English.

    Demonstrably false.


    Demonstrably false.

    Demonstrably false.


    Demonstrably false.


    Yep
     
    Derideo_Te likes this.
  2. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    demonstrably false. That is not the definition of marriage in the US, or most every other first world nation.
     
    Derideo_Te likes this.
  3. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,542
    Likes Received:
    4,855
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes, there is... See Article I Section I.
     
  4. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,542
    Likes Received:
    4,855
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    They have all re-defined the term. What these countries are recognizing as "marriages" are not marriages. Those "marriages" are Satanic counterfeits of marriage.
     
  5. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,542
    Likes Received:
    4,855
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    ARF. RAAA. (Argument by Repetition Fallacy. Repetitious Argumentation Already Addressed)
     
  6. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your opinion on the definition is meaningless. Nobody is bound by your religious beliefs. Marriage is a legal institution. And as such, the 14th amendment applies and precludes bans on same sex and interracial couples. Same sex couples are married identically as opposite sex couples. This is reality.
     
    Last edited: Nov 21, 2019
    Derideo_Te likes this.
  7. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I accept your concession. And you don’t know what any of that means.
     
    Derideo_Te likes this.
  8. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,542
    Likes Received:
    4,855
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    My opinion holds meaning.

    Never said they were. That's freedom OF religion, remember??

    No it isn't.

    The 14th Amendment says no such thing.
     
  9. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,542
    Likes Received:
    4,855
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    ARF. RAAA.
    Inversion Fallacy.
     
    Last edited: Nov 21, 2019
  10. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Only for you. The law doesn’t give a **** what you think.


    You are trying to apply your religious beliefs definition of marriage to everyone else. Doesn’t work that way.

    Well, the law says it is.


    of course it does. It’s why same sex and interracial marriage bans were struck down. Lol
     
    Derideo_Te likes this.
  11. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I accept your concession again. And you have no idea what any of that means.
     
    Derideo_Te likes this.
  12. Aleksander Ulyanov

    Aleksander Ulyanov Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2013
    Messages:
    41,184
    Likes Received:
    16,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    For the same reason that the ninth Amendment exists, to deal with other rights that the Founding Fathers may have missed or that may not have existed at the time. The Constitution exists to protect and expand our rights, not limit them
     
    Derideo_Te likes this.
  13. Aleksander Ulyanov

    Aleksander Ulyanov Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2013
    Messages:
    41,184
    Likes Received:
    16,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Which says:

    "All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives"

    I don't see anything there saying anything about the powers granted being exclusive. Again, if they had meant such an important thing to be the case they would have SAID so.
     
    Last edited: Nov 21, 2019
    Derideo_Te likes this.
  14. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    18,068
    Likes Received:
    2,644
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What legislative powers does congress have that aren't enumerated in article I, section 8?
     
  15. Aleksander Ulyanov

    Aleksander Ulyanov Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2013
    Messages:
    41,184
    Likes Received:
    16,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Freedom of religion implies and contains Freedom from religion, for I can easily say I practice a religion which says there is/are no god/gods nor any all-inclusive moral/ethical concepts/precepts and you cannot say I cannot do that without violating my freedom of religion, so the separation of the two is absurd.

    Sorry, not even the lexicographers agree with you any more

    https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2013/07/...nition-of-marriage-to-include-equal-marriage/






    Power 18 gives the Congress whatever are needed to do whatever is "necessary and proper" to do the other 17

    https://www.khanacademy.org/humanit...d-implied-powers-of-the-us-federal-government
     
    Last edited: Nov 21, 2019
    Derideo_Te likes this.
  16. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    18,068
    Likes Received:
    2,644
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So the 17 powers listed. That's it?
     
    gfm7175 likes this.
  17. Aleksander Ulyanov

    Aleksander Ulyanov Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2013
    Messages:
    41,184
    Likes Received:
    16,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No, the 18th power too. The others are just the enumerated ones

    Please tell us what in the article I included you find unclear.
     
  18. Aleksander Ulyanov

    Aleksander Ulyanov Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2013
    Messages:
    41,184
    Likes Received:
    16,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    post deleted
     
    Last edited: Nov 21, 2019
  19. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    18,068
    Likes Received:
    2,644
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The 18th allows laws to be made to carry into execution the previous 17.

    I find nothing you said unclear. Simply incorrect.
     
    gfm7175 likes this.
  20. Aleksander Ulyanov

    Aleksander Ulyanov Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2013
    Messages:
    41,184
    Likes Received:
    16,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Again, read the included article, then tell me how it is incorrect
     
  21. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    18,068
    Likes Received:
    2,644
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't debate articles. Sorry. If you have a point, please make it. Otherwise whatever.
     
    gfm7175 likes this.
  22. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Inane non sequitur!
     
  23. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Appeal to Faith FALLACY!

    https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/31/Appeal-to-Faith

     
  24. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
     
  25. Belch

    Belch Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2015
    Messages:
    16,275
    Likes Received:
    4,479
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Actually no. There's this idea called incorporation that is NOT what the founders anticipated, but the SCOTUS being the buttmunches they are decided that this is how it's going to work. How it works is that the constitution applies to the federal government. Incorporation is when the supreme court decides that a particular (not all) aspect of the constitution applies to the individual states.

    The constitution was never supposed to apply to the individual states, but the 10th opened the way for that because it says anything NOT in the constitution is up to the states.
     

Share This Page