Prove Flight 93 was a bunker buster

You have no proof to make that assertion, but there is clear proof that you lied in this very thread.

Moral high-ground: you've got absolutely none

 

Nope, I never stated that I was there.

 

Okay...my mistake.

 

What did you state so no one gets it wrong again?

 

Just read what I posted. Easy as pie.

 

Game playing. Cute.

What did you ORIGINALLY say about the Shanksville workers and footage evidence that they supposedly had that has apparently caused so much confusion?

 

It's still available to view, right here in the forum. Don't be lazy, look it up.

 

Since you're going to refer to what he said in a completely different thread (clearly not the topic of this thread), why don't you respond to the posts DDave and I made concerning your honesty in other threads?

Your game playing is really not cute, it's actually kind of pathetic considering how obvious it is.

 

Yes I do:

See, he lied evidence that proved 93 buried has been posted.

 

You can't remember what you said? Sad.

 

I do remember. You can't remember how to look something up?

Sadder.

 

You must have missed this.

 

No, it had something to do about proof 93 buried, as I recall.

 

The proof you 'seek' is just a phone call away.

 

Where does it show evidence 93 buried?

 

...and the physical proof of what is where in that collection of propaganda?
Photos usually work well. Got any?

 

In the sources listed at the bottom.

(It's called honest research.)

 

OK, what's your number so I can get a copy of the photos & videos from you that you claim to have gotten from the Shanks workers that prove 93 buried?

 

Direct contact with the sources works even better.

Got a phone?

 

Thanks for admitting you LIED.

 

I repeat, this forum is incredibly stupid.

Seriously.

 

I made no such claim.

You have their contact info. Use it.

 

The proof is in the sources. Use them, or whine some more.

 

Six threads that I can see . . . all started by suede . . . all closed. You'd think he would have been convinced one way or the other by now.

It's all in the original thread you started on the topic.

http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/182383-heres-good-one.html

You know, the one you started back when you joined where you pretend to be new to the issue when in actuality it became quite clear that you had quite a bit of background on the topic already.

 

Insulting another poster by calling them a 'liar'?....My word.