Thousands of tons of stuff falling from hundreds of feet in the sky displace some air. Think about it. Did you see the way the dust rolled away from the scene? It is called a "turbidity flow." Look it up. Even idiot boy King referred to it, although the doofus then went and called it a pyroclastic flow. That does not look much like a human body. I cannot even imagine how a human body would be in a position to come out of the vent. Would you care to show us a diagram of how that would have come about? Without some really powerful evidence to the contray, rational people would have to conclude that is is something other than a human body. That there is dust or steam being vented thereactually supports the idea that there were local failures going on (without the aid of explosives) for some time before the collapse. The ejecta here starts as a somewhat tenuous front which builds in density for a brief moment, then attenuates again. That is not an explosive device being detonated.
The fact that we have multiple phone calls from inside the building at the time of collapse, and not a single one has the sounds of explosives going off in the background is a pretty good indicator that no bombs were used. Scratch that, the fact that there is absolutely no evidence at all that any bombs were used in any of the buildings is a perfect indicator that no bombs were used. Thankfully I have Koko on ignore so I don't have to see the upcoming ignorance.
yeh that way you wont have to watch me laugh my ass off at you. grow a pair and tell us what a 5 overpressure would sound like over a phone LOL you shouldnt jump on leftys wet dreams he will get you discredited before you cite 3 of his theories.
at least he had the brains enough to correct himself turbidity flow A Dictionary of Earth Sciences | 1999 | AILSA ALLABY and MICHAEL ALLABY | 30 words | Copyright turbidity flow See GRAIN FLOW. grain flow A Dictionary of Earth Sciences | 1999 | AILSA ALLABY and MICHAEL ALLABY | 235 words | Copyright grain flow The movement of sediment under gravity where the sediment is supported by direct grain-to-grain contact. This differs from turbidity flow, where the sediment moves under the influence of gravity in a turbulent flow of water. mora cocka poo poo from yoo yoo
The dust and debris were propelled by gravity and air flow. "Grain flow" my ass! mora cocka poo poo from yoo yoo
no its not I already posted identical explosive jets, you fail to recognize and you fail to recognize that is a person being blown out of the building. your claim if expertise is complete bull(*)(*)(*)(*). you have shown nothing more than you can pull from any wiki article.
What looks like an explosive jet to you may not look like o0ne to somebody with a clue what they are talking about. That one in the gif you have been spamming the board with is not one.
you talking about this one? yeh its not spam though. the dumbest people on the planet can see its CGI. well troughers excepted. evens even said it right on the interview with brinkley, some of the worst cgi he ever saw! troughers hate seeing those and always ignore them or say they are puffs and its so easy to prove they are not. LOLOL then again since you agree its not an explosion that only leaves cgi so its nice to see you are coming around.
Aside from the fact that the gif is total (*)(*)(*)(*), I see nothing suspicious about the impact. It behaves exactly as it is supposed to behave.
here, here is abigger one for you so in your own words what would something suspicious look like to you? .
Where are the windows in that gif? That's not the WTC, TrougherJo. - - - Updated - - - Where are the windows in that gif? That's not the WTC, TrougherJo.
from the guy in batter park slo mo so we can watch whats really going on there. Like when you want to see what happened in a foot ball play, slo mo.
it clearly demonstrates the point however which it is intended to convey, well except for you of course since it does not have the government good house keeping seal of approval. but then you may as well get used to the idea that you really dont count anyway. dont quit your day job
It clearly doesn't. Did you have a point? - - - Updated - - - It clearly doesn't. Did you have a point?