According to anti-Russian extremists, Putin and his "bot" armies are attempting to help Tulsi Gabbard win the Democratic presidential primaries. In case you are not aware, here are the issues that define Tulsi's presidential campaign: Ending disastrous wars that waste trillions of dollars and produce millions of casualties Investing tax money in America instead of wasting it on needless warmongering Using diplomacy instead of war to resolve conflicts and ease tensions Ending the heinous "war on drugs" that has wasted trillions of dollars and destroyed millions of lives unnecessarily So if Tulsi really is Putin's choice, then I can only conclude that Putin must really love America. Why else would Putin support the only candidate who is serious about investing in America's infrastructure, healthcare, education, etc.? Is there a conspiracy among the Russian ruling class to improve the lives of ordinary Americans? If so, then Americans are obviously in desperate need of Russian "interference" in the upcoming elections.
The way Democrats treat Tulsi proves that they are not serious about helping Americans. The Democratic establishment just wants power and money and will do and say almost anything in order to get it. Democrats have created a brand of being the "liberal" party, yet almost every policy the Democratic establishment promotes creates extremely illiberal outcomes. The fact that we're still in the midst of a McCarthyite hysteria surrounding "Russian interference" is proof of that. Stoking tensions between two nuclear powers and succumbing to rampant paranoia about Russian bogeymen is not a "liberal" position.
Tulsi wants to end the never-ending wars of regime change and move towards a peaceful law-abiding relationship with the rest of the world. Democrats and Republicans alike hate the idea.
That mimics my beliefs when the looney class persisted in announcing how much Putin loves Trump. Express. Home of the Daily and Sunday Express. WAR READY: Trump deploys TANKS to Estonia as NATO builds up HUGE army on Russian border DONALD Trump has deployed swathes of US military equipment to Estonia as Nato continues to build its growing army on the Russian border. By ALETHA ADU PUBLISHED: 01:03, Tue, Feb 7, 2017 | UPDATED: 07:11, Tue, Feb 7, 2017
You'd have to ask her but from what I heard her say, it was her patriotic duty and she doesn't want to see anymore of her comrades killed in stupid foreign wars.
Putin likes girls. Remember when Putin had the hots for Natalia Poklonskaya ? Now Putin likes Tulsi Gabbard and is taking up surfing. And Obama don't surf and was America's first hodad President's.
Translating American into European... >"You'd have to ask her but from what I heard her say, it was her nationalistic duty and she doesn't want to see anymore of her comrades killed in politically correct foreign wars."<
Gabbard was one of the contestants on stage who made some sense. In a normal world she could run a good campaign but in today's world the democrats are looking for a Loony Tunes candidate. So the democratic machine will not support Gabbard. Had Gabbard said she was for killing a baby after it was born but hated the U.S. for the way our country is treating children who sneak into our country she might get more support from the party.
Why wouldn't they Dirty Donald just offered them all the help he could provide for the Russians to fight their Siberian forest fires!!Did he offer California help????No he did not!!
Sandy Shanks said: ↑ Trump nominated John Ratcliffe to replace Dan Coats as the next Director of National Intelligence. This would launch a lawmaker with less than five years national experience and no years of intelligence experience under his belt to the pinnacle of US espionage in one of the most powerful and sensitive jobs in government. Trump chose him because of his die-hard conservative persona that has made him a star in the House and a darling on Fox News. This, folks, is Trump's idea of a joke. That was written on Monday. On Friday Trump pulled the nomination. I said the nomination was a joke. Then Trump made a fool of himself ... again. He said the news media is part of the White House vetting process. "I get a name, I give it out to the press and you vet for me. A lot of time you do a very good job. Not always," Trump told reporters. "If you look at the vetting process for the White House, it is very good, but you are part of the vetting process. I give out a name to the press and you vet for me, we save a lot of money that way." Honest, Trump actually said that. He is on television making that ludicrous remark, which begs a question. Is he really that stupid? Will even his fans believe that comment? Yeah, probably. "If you look at the vetting process for the White House, it is very good." If the very opposite is true, Trump will lie, hoping some will believe him. He has made a career of doing just that nearly on a daily basis. Black is white, night is day, that is Trump's mantra. Actually, Trump is setting records regarding people he has nominated, but failed the vetting process and had to be withdrawn. There are far too many to name here. Check for yourself if you don't believe me. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Donald_Trump_nominees_who_have_withdrawn The White House is in chaos. His fans say, what is not to like. Vladimir Putin is enormously pleased with the performance of his protégé.
correction, it's career pollies that hate the idea, along with anything else that'd force them into obscurity... time to limit terms to just one 5 year term in a lifetime, for all positions other than justices (which should be limited to 21 years maximum)...
Because of the widespread corruption and poverty, Russia can hardly keep control over their buffer zones (Belarus, Ukraine, Georgia), so Russia is incapable and it has no intention to expand, so Russia is not a threat. Wasting one trillion of taxpayer money every year for the invented "Russian threat" actually means increasing the poverty – the administration doesn’t even have that money and they are growing the public debt in order to get that money – and that means increasing the poverty because it’s the poor people that will have to pay for the public debt. The servants of the plutocracy (Democrats and Republicans alike) are doing their best to waste the taxpayer money on unnecessary military expenses, because they are desperate to increase the poverty as much as they can, so they can transform the Western countries into Third World countries. Once they achieve that, they can do whatever they want with this entire planet. For example they can remove the "surplus population" and they can "ecologize" the planet (check Georgia Guidestones to get an idea about numbers). Remember the Irish Genocide (1850) when they killed one million people (20% of the population) to remove the surplus population "in order to improve the economy"?
