Racemixing is bad, and here’s the science to prove it

"You have to look at more than that."

In fact, you have to get off this crazy "it's in the genes" rant.

 

Ok, then why not discourage it? The point of dating should be to find a spouse, and then to have children. If mixed relationships make things difficult for everyone, why not discourage the dating of other races, as people used to do up until recently?

But don’t you think these things would naturally line up more in your own race, with more genetics, more culture, and more history being shared?

It will, and I suspect it will be difficult.

There’s always going to be exceptions. The studies show an intermediary effect with IQ. Odds are she has one parent significantly smarter than her.

 

Intelligence is heritable. It’s largely a function of how smart your parents are. Culture and upbringing can affect it but not to that big of an extent. Look up the results of the transracial adoption study.

 

Love the posters who are paranoid about the future of their skin.

 

You're still promoting racism.

Having the state take action against two people who love each other is just plain unacceptable.

And, dumping hate on a mixed race couple IS the PROBLEM - it is NOT a solution.

 

Identity is such a powerful and valuable thing. That’s why the left spends a lot of energy and money convincing whites that they have no identity, while at the same time, telling their groups to embrace theirs.

 

Go back to stormfront trash.

 

You don’t consider infertility to be evidence of damage?

Except for the OP of course. Congrats on the weakest reply so far in this thread.

 

Love the posters who think race is a difference in skin color.

 

There were laws against race mixing because people didn’t want them happening to the point where they empowered the government to do this. It didn’t come from the state. And the video creator didn’t even advocate for laws to be made against it. He wanted them to be discouraged based on the reasons he provided. If we as a society looked at a mixed race couple the way we looked at 50 year olds marrying 18 year olds it wouldn’t happen all that often, no laws required.

 

Natural selection is driven by individual choice. Mates are selected by choices both unconscious and conscious for the purpose of the production of successful offspring. The great thing about it, is that you don't get to tell others what's best for them.

Piss off with your supposition that people are picking the wrong mates.

 

Sure it does. It proves that people can address concepts that do not physically exist. Social constructs are unreal in a sense, but they are very real in the sense that people's behavior is measurably altered by them.

I'm really entertained by how you seem to believe these are organizations that make executive decisions. They're rhizomatic, spontaneous mobs. Everything just runs on hype.

And Bill Cosby was also an actor, what else is new?

 

What was the specific damage?

The OP cites some correlations. That does not mean there is causation.

Many of the negative results clearly have their roots in racism. It's that racism that is the problem.

Plus, some of the elements in the OP are just plain stupid.

There is NOTHING even remotely scientific about this screed of yours.

It's purely a piece of racist hate literature.

 

Mindset and because they don't know any better. You ever been on post to the PX or Commissary? The amount of inter racial marriages and mixed kids would astound you. GI's travel the world and become exposed to many different traditions and cultures. They lose their hangups. They aren't tied to their homogeneous home or country anymore. they have been out in the world.

 

I’m surprised you’ve only used this exact reply only 7 times before. I could have sworn a lot more of your posts were at this level of substance.

 

I know with different species of cherry trees they can interbreed, but the offspring are often not as vigorous growing as the pure species parents, the hybrids will not be quite as healthy or disease resistant, and typically have a reduced lifespan (might only be 50 years instead of hundreds of years).

You can also see this with roses. Your ordinary garden roses (which are hybrids) require a lot of care to grow well, where as the original species they were bred from grow easily with very little care.

 

What genetics show us is that most ethnic groups are the result of mixing events. Take Europeans for example. The booming field of ancient DNA sequencing has shown us that Europeans are basically a mixture of three groups: the original “western” hunter gatherers, Neolithic farmers from the near east, and steppe populations from just north of the Black Sea, who were the first to introduce the so-called “ancient north Eurasian” or ANE genetic elements to Europe (ANE DNA is also shared by modern Siberians and Native Americans.) Mixing is what made us.

As for synergistic genetic components, these do exist. You could have multiple alleles for skin pigmentation for example, making you more suited to a specific climate. Mixing these alleles could result in an intermediate skin color, less protective against the sun and less conducive to vitamin D synthesis in environments with low sunlight. Both parents would theoretically be better adapted than the offspring to their historical environments. But we no longer live in an environment resembling the one we evolved in. We have white people living in Texas. Since most differences between races are likely to be adaptations to very specific environments, this means that this concern is kind of moot in the modern world.

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/05/theres-no-such-thing-pure-european-or-anyone-else

 

Probably so, but it does show we all come from the same place and all of us had the same beginning. Every single one of us began as one race and diversed from that. As time goes by we are slowly reverting back to the one race as the world has become a smaller place. No more living in isolation in a homogeneous community.

 

Now contexted by this message, you avatar should be prohibited as we know who you claim the "apes" are.

 

Natural selection is not based on choice. Black people did not choose to have black skin on the Equator because they wanted it and made a conscious choice to have it, but because it was a beneficial trait that protected them in that environment. The ones who had that trait did better than the ones who had other shades of skin, so the inevitable result was an all black population in that area. The same is true for whites in Europe.

But I’ll take your advice and naturally select my choice to make my argument without the need for your permission. I think race mixing is harmful to our society. So did most people in the West up to about 50 years ago. I’ve given the reasons why.

 

Who is to say different populations of humans are not different species?
Taxonomists regard many different varieties of plants and animals as different species, even though they are capable of freely hybridizing. Indeed, introgression sometimes occurs in nature across species lines.

 

The OPer is about 600,000 to late when neanderthals intermixed with homo erectus. But for interbreeding we'd all be either homo erectus or neanderthals. The human race advanced by genetic diversity, not inbreeding.

"Genetic migration" specifically means different ethnicities and even species interbreeding.

The message of the OPer is biological nonsense. The only one that has some merit is his claim that some racists will try every way possible to harass mixed couples and children. He can look in the mirror for that maybe, but I don't know. I suspect, however, the vastly greater social replusion now is against people who spout and act upon intense racism - not those who are of mixed marriage or of racially mixed ancestry.

I bet a social experiment would prove it.

1. He gets in front of any large group and reads his OP

2. A black-white mixed child gets in front of the same group and says "this is my mom and my dad" - one white and the other black.

Who do you think will be booed and who will be applauded?

 

The "white race" is already so mongrelized as to be basically non-existent and has been for centuries.

 

Another old thread that may be of interest: Partially Africanized bees found in East Tennessee

Well it looks like two different bee species can interbreed. And these different bee species have very different levels of aggressiveness.
The hybridized populations are now causing problems.

 

The most Caucasian people of all genetically are very black skinned Tamils of Southwest India. If the OPer looks "white," he - like all white people - is all but certainly a mongrel. In their ancestry, ALL white people were black.

The OPer, if "white," is a black man with a genetic skin disorder.