Religion and Morality

In order for atheists to have a system "in common," they'd have to share it as a whole. That's what "in common" means. Atheists do not have a system of beliefs or practice in common.

 

Merely the already shown attempts you continue to make to be believable and continue to fail. Hence, your repeated attempts at this thread in various guises that have failed. Hint, no one agrees with you that has any education at all.

 

Would you mind providing a source for your "atheist central" claims?

 

Thats a compostion fallacy.

a system, is a system of beliefs, not an operation manual.

No atheists believe in God, they share that in common. Its binary.

In order for you to justify that every last detail of the atheist value system be accepted by every atheist you are creating an impossible set of standards since no theist based religion does not share 'every' value of their deity either. The double standard fallacy. Sure in an ideologically perfect system, a system that does not and never will exist, you can claim all or none, but thats not remotely in the same universe as reality

 

did you say something?

 

I am saying exactly what I typed. Comprehension problems? Or just refuse to believe that anyone would dare to call you out on your claims?

 

So you admit that your precious morals equal religion is incorrect. Progress at last.

 

Wow, you are really getting lame in your attempts to dispute actual information.

 

please stop troll baiting with bullshit conclusions aleady.

 

for better clarification on the word system:


sys·tem

noun

1. 1.
   a set of connected things or parts forming a complex whole, in particular.
   • a set of things working together as parts of a mechanism or an interconnecting network.
2. 2.
   a set of principles or procedures according to which something is done; an organized scheme or method

merely a group of complied beliefs one uses as for instance their moral compass in life, pertains to everyone anyone.

 

Too funny, how desperate are you?

See the green around what I quoted, you might not have worked it out yet but, that indicates that I used a quote function which means you can go directly back to the text to see the quotation in context. I also put ellipses in there, did you spot the three little dots that looked like this, '...'? They indicate that I have snipped the quoted post; that I am literally declaring in the text that I have left something out.

Finally, I didn't change the context, you were absurdly mocking yourself by trying to bump up yet another inane thread, I mocked you for doing so so, we are both using the same context of satirising you.

 

your lack of belief BS has been exposed for the fraud it is and you have the gall to post bold faced lies and call me desperate, are you a budding comedian?

No thats not what '...' means in a quote because I use it as a pause or shift between thoughts, and you cant even get that right, the proper way to write it is: '. . .'

Its fraud, by quote mining and editing my post to completely change the meaning of what I said to make a desperate attempt to insult me then spin me as desperate to veil exactly what you just did.



My my, look at that, seems you did change the context after all.

The only thing you have successfully accomplished here is to prove you have nothing to offer this discussion but red herrings and dirty debate tricks.

 

It is simply astonishing, you cannot comprehend that atheists have only one thing in common that binds them all, a lack of belief in gods. That's it. Anything else you attempt to say about atheists may apply to some but not all.

 

Please do not start writing to yourself aswell!

 

Too funny, how desperate are you?

See the green around what I quoted, you might not have worked it out yet but, that indicates that I used a quote function which means you can go directly back to the text to see the quotation in context. I also put ellipses in there, did you spot the three little dots that looked like this, '...'? They indicate that I have snipped the quoted post; that I am literally declaring in the text that I have left something out.

Finally, I didn't change the context, you were absurdly mocking yourself by trying to bump up yet another inane thread, I mocked you for doing so so, we are both using the same context of satirising you.

 

your lack of belief BS has been exposed for the fraud it is and you have the gall to post bold faced lies and call me desperate, are you a budding comedian?

No thats not what '...' means in a quote because I use it as a pause or shift between thoughts, and you cant even get that right, the proper way to write it is: '. . .'

Its fraud, by quote mining and editing my post to completely change the meaning of what I said to make a desperate attempt to insult me then spin me as desperate to veil exactly what you just did.



My my, look at that, seems you did change the context after all.

The only thing you have successfully accomplished here is to prove you have nothing to offer this discussion but red herrings and dirty debate tricks.

 

ad hom
composition
false premise
false analogy
false premise
composition
false cause

7 for 7, nothing to see here folks.

 

Too funny, how desperate are you? Have you ever put this much anger and energy into researching the Holocaust?

See the green around what I quoted, you might not have worked it out yet but, that indicates that I used a quote function which means you can go directly back to the text to see the quotation in context. I also put ellipses in there, did you spot the three little dots that looked like this, '...'? They indicate that I have snipped the quoted post; that I am literally declaring in the text that I have left something out.

Finally, I didn't change the context, you were absurdly mocking yourself by trying to bump up yet another inane thread, I mocked you for doing so so, we are both using the same context of satirising you.

 

You must have missed my response:

your lack of belief BS has been exposed for the fraud it is and you have the gall to post bold faced lies and call me desperate, are you a budding comedian?

No thats not what '...' means in a quote because I use it as a pause or shift between thoughts, and you cant even get that right, the proper way to write it is: '. . .'

Its fraud, by quote mining and editing my post to completely change the meaning of what I said to make a desperate attempt to insult me then spin me as desperate to veil exactly what you just did.



My my, look at that, seems you did change the context after all.

The only thing you have successfully accomplished here is to prove you have nothing to offer this discussion but red herrings and dirty debate tricks.

 

Facts,
The only thing all atheists have in common, is a lack of belief in god.

That is all there is to see, in thread after thread!

 

yawn;
false premise repeated
nothing to see here.

 

No false premise, come see the deflection.

Facts,
The only thing all atheists have in common, is a lack of belief in god.

 

false cause
faulty premise
composition
still nothing to see here folks.

 

Please stop posting BS topics again and again. No one wants to see what you claim.

 

No false premise, come see the deflection.

Facts,
The only thing all atheists have in common, is a lack of belief in god.

"Did you pay for the full five minute argument?" (copy right Monty Python)