Just exactly who are you to declare how many positions there are? Are you the arbiter of all beliefs, while having only false ones yourself? You continue to make stupid and false claims, as that is all that you have. That, and making up your own nonsense terms to support yourself. Contradicting yourself in your own post isn't exactly brilliant either. You claim, falsely, that there can be only three positions and then merrily go one to name what you consider to be four of them. A sure sign that you are missing out on comprehension, or in terms you seem to revel in, you are a lacker.
Just can't wrap your alleged mind around the fact that an atheist does not believe in god, no matter how you prattle on about it. A strange position for an alleged agnostic, but then you aren't really one of those either.
I realize how difficult this is for someone who is all butthurt to find out their atheist religion and dogma is irrational. Sorry for that. Otherwise its called logic, a discipline lackers sorely lack. really? Seems you are the one in distress that is not coping with reality. Lacker style alleged atheists claim a lot of bullshit that has been shown by real atheists to be bullshit as well. Maybe its better if you find other threads that arent so stressful for you? I'd hate to see you go into convulsions over a philosophical debate. So does God exist? .....or are you goint to dodge the question like all the other lackers out here?
I suppose that to you these "facts" that you make up are true. To the thinking people out here you continue to be delusional at best, totally wrong and hateful in reality. BTW, you do realize that "philosophical" does not mean factual, only what some people think and others, like you, who are incapable of thought parrot at all times. Not to mention that I have told you multiple times that I deny the existence of this gawd of yours. Refusal to comprehend this says a great deal about your mental capability.
thats what the unthinking stooges think, not educated 'people'. Carry on with your denial, I think am going to invest in butt hurt cream since I am sure there is going to be a run on it from lackers as the face the realities of lack. Sure prince phillip exists so what of it?
Speaking of "unthinking stooges", how are you? You appear to be a prime example of hating yourself. Also, when you can no longer deny a fat you try to denigrate it. Typical of someone who refuses to fact the truth.
If you had half of the intelligence that you think you do, you would readily understand that you are still spewing garbage. BTW, you just got caught again. According to you, there are no "real atheists" yet you feel free to state what they think. How false can you get? You better apply that ointment you are always going on about to yourself.
well there is one I know of here otherwise the rest are just lackers Apply your own ointment, you certainly are obsessed with me, that usually happens when someone contracts terminal butthurt.
Since you continually spread false statements about everything, it is not an obsession to correct you, it is a public service. BTW, you obsession with butts is showing again. Did you hurt your trying to pull your head out? BTW, I see that you can't defend you citing things that aren't true with only your own opinion, wrong as it is, presented as evidence. Not surprised that you prefer to attempt to change the subject rather than defend your lies.
wow such a raging vile obsession you have for me. Maybe we should change the thread to ars raging butthurt obsession. Here I did some research just for you, hope it helps:
Funny how you have lotiions of this kind at your finger tips. Show just how much you use it on yourself or want to apply it to others. Really kind of sick.
yes the end game when after all you posers get your asses handed to you countless times and are forced to change socks to turn it into a name calling fest. I enjoy it too since it proves your concession.
Your own supporting documentation of what constitutes a religion proves that your statement that all beliefs systems are religion is incorrect. Oh and just in case you didn't know the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy isn't a dictionary. Perhaps you could use a dictionary to look up the meaning of dictionary if that wouldn't be too much effort for you.
Actually I did. You just couldn't refute what I said so you resorted to your normal tactics of name calling. See post #135 which uses your own sources to disprove your definition.