You got me. I think it's implicit though. You cherry-picked her lack of foresight, not his. Nothing about whether he should have thought before he acted first (picked up a gun and shot someone)
I know her explanation and story so I can comment. I don't know the shooter's story or explanation because the news media only presented one side.
Trespassing to take down a political sign is a crime and suppression of free speech - a bad deed. Shooting a trespasser in the act of suppressing free speech is a good deed. The community as a whole receives a significant benefit whenever an aggressive criminal is caught and stopped in the act. This is America. A pellet in the butt is a very restrained measured response.
That is a lie. And, even if they had no monetary value, I guess you thinkbelieve that it's O.K. to steal stuff just as long as you ignorantly believe that it's worthless, right?
You think those signs are free? Who provides them, the sign fairy? They just pull them out of the air? Maybe it's not a sign fairy. Maybe it's like a sign unicorn that just craps campaign signs. Do you think that the elves bring them?