Republicans Know Trump is a Racist, per George Conway

Scott Jennings just said "college-educated women in the suburbs could get angry" with Trump again [just like last year's election] per CNN

 

Well then - you should have NO trouble here:

- Cite the text of Trump's supposedly racist tweets/statements
- Demonstrate how those tweets/statements meet the definition of racism, as per post #416.

We both know, however, you cannot do any such thing.

 

And then Hillary will win by a landslide and the Dems will take the Governorship and take all of Congress!

Oh wait. I forgot alt left radical predictions don't always go according to plan lol!

 

Is that the thought process of the left ???

 

Trump claims he couldn't hear the chanting last night

 

Do you have any reason to think trump actually knows the countries they were from, especially given that most were natural born US citizens? Do you think he knows where Pressley family originates from (does it even f***ing matter??)? She was born in Cincinnati BTW. Your obfuscation is bullshit. The ONLY common thread is the color of their skin. Further, you know damn well that telling a third or fourth generation white American from Russia or Poland to go back home would be nonsensical.

Given that the comment was based entirely on race it follows that he believes his race to be superior. He wasn't complimenting them after all.

 

Oh look - you can't address the point. What a surprise.

You cannot show this to be true.

Thanks for trying, but you clearly cannot meet the challenge.

 

So that's how you roll? Someone shows takes you up on your incessant trolling, shows you to be wrong and instead of a meaningful response you respond with "nuh uh". Or is your problem more of a comprehension issue?

 

After Trump's lame excuse this morning, the thread should be retitled: "Republicans Know Trump is a Fool"

 

Can anyone imagine the fun tonight's TV comedians are going to have?

"Trump Disavows ‘Send Her Back’ Chant as G.O.P. Frets Over Ugly Phrase"
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/18/us/politics/ilhan-omar-donald-trump.html

"Mr. Trump said he was “not happy” with the chant, directed at Representative Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, a hijab-wearing freshman Democrat whom the president has singled out repeatedly for verbal excoriation. On Thursday he claimed that he had tried to cut off the chant, an assertion contradicted by video of the event. Asked why he did not stop it, Mr. Trump said, “I think I did — I started speaking very quickly.”

In fact, as the crowd roared “send her back,” Mr. Trump looked around silently and paused as the scene unfolded in front of him, doing nothing to halt the chorus."

 

That’s a lie.

 

Prove me wrong or go home, Republican

 

You just said he couldn’t hear the chants. Your credibility is zero.

BTW Trump is playing the Democrats like a cheap flute. He’s succeeded in getting the Democrats to defend the moronic squad who advocate for socialism, demand that taxpayers fund student loan forgiveness and reparations, and claim that all Republicans are racists. Too funny.

 

You just proved yourself a liar above.

 

On the contrary. Trump took an advantage and made it into a situation where he now has to explain himself. And, of course, he lies. That is why he will be royally roasted tonight.

 

I might be wrong but I thought I read that Trump initially denied ever hearing the chant.

The crowd was only chanting Trump's own words back to him. How's is he going to handle the horde next time?

 

You post that he couldn’t hear and then minutes later you post that he could hear. Hilarious.

I’m sure that talking head racialists on CNN/MSNBC will be all spun up tonight. Their audiences of hundreds of people will go nuts.

 

You made it up. You wrote what you wanted to believe.

 

Watch Trevor Noah and just progress through every network tonight. Not for the faint of heart, I'm afraid

 

In-fact, Republicans might want to turn the TV to Animal Planet for a few days.

https://www.animalplanet.com/tv-shows/meet-the-orangutans/full-episodes/baby-boom

 

I've actually always thought that said definition was inaccurate. My definition would be simply: Bigotry based on a person's race.

The reason that I don't think it's accurate is that there doesn't seem to be a word for this definition:
prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race.

Now this begs a different questions. Is the fact that I left out "based on the belief that one's own race is superior" mean that I am racist? Possibly, I can't be the judge of that.
Is the Google definition worded that way so that only white people can be racist and does that question mean that I believe that white people are superior? Sounds like it to me. But I have heard the argument made, by black people, that blacks cannot be racist because they just want to be equal and do not believe that their race is superior. I've heard this argument made by American Indians also. But I actually believe we are equal also which would mean that I am indeed not racist.

The rat hole does go deep which is why I prefer the simply bigotry based on race definition.

 

Why would any rational person watch the racialist programs. All they do is repeat the fallacy that Trump and all Republicans are RACISTS !!! It’s moronic.

 

Dr. Martin Luther King got it right in his dream that everyone be judged on the content of their character and not the color of their skin. That’s all you need to know.

 

That is why I am encouraging Animal Planet but not ABC/ CBS/ NBC/ MSNBC/ CNN/ Comedy Channel/ TBS etc [even FOX News].

 

You work the code words in quite smoothly. I haven’t heard that “soft bigotry of low expectations” line for some time!

Minorities of all color, shape and size hear Trump’s unsubtle race baiting just as loud and clear as that crowd in Greenville did.