Republicans Will Win 2016 Presidential Race By A Landslide !

I've been a yellow-dog Democrat all my life, but I'll be voting republican from here on out for two reasons. First, I'm FED UP WITH 95% OF THE ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY BEING CONTROLLED BY THE 2-5% HOMOsexual COMMUNITY. Almost every movie or TV show today has HOMOsexual component in it , promoting HOMOsexuality like it's a normal alternative lifestyle to millions of impressionable and confused adolescents in PRIME TIME every night, WELL IT'S NOT NORMAL IT'S A MENTAL OR PHYSICAL DISORDER THAT NEEDS TO BE TREATED LIKE YOU'D TREAT SCHIZOPHRENIA OR CANCER Secondly, I'm friggin tired of the Democrats trying to curb my gun ownership rights with FALSE FLAG EVENTS LIKE SANDY HOOK WHICH WAS NOTHING BUT A POORLY EXECUTED FEMA / HOMELAND SECURITY CAPSTONE DRILL MODELED AFTER THE DUNBLANE SCOTLAND SCHOOL SHOOTING IN THE 90'S WHERE HAND GUN OWNERSHIP WAS TOTALLY BANNED IN GREAT BRITAIN A YEAR LATER WHICH IS THEIR GOAL HERE!
There are 10's of millions of GUN OWNING DEMOCRATS THAT ARE AGAINST THE HOMOsexual AGENDA THAT IS HIGH JACKING THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY . Also , there are 10's 0f millions Democratic Men of all Races saying they'll vote for Hillary in public, BUT NEVER WILL INSIDE THAT VOTING BOOTH ,GUARANTEED. Republicans will win the 2016 PRESIDENTIAL RACE BY A LANDSLIDE !!!!

 

You've convinced me.

 

Just like in 2012, right?

 

You are running Hillary. The youth movement that carried Obama home twice ain't getting behind the poster child for corrupt political dealings.

 

Your rudeness and homophobia are noted.

 

I'll be voting GOP too, but not because I have a problem with homosexuals. I'm totally secure in my heterosexual marriage and what others do has no effect on me. I'm all for gays being able to marry and, although I don't watch TV, I certainly would not cast my vote based on anything the entertainment industry is doing.

I'm a Republican because I back fiscal conservancy. I have no stake in social issues and I have no desire to control anyone else.

What the GOP doesn't need is a bunch of control freaks that want to tell everyone else how to live. That's what the democrats are doing right now. The dems are concerned that someone will think a racial thought - someone will look down on Islam - blah, blah, blah.....

Stay in the Democrat Party - we really don't need controlling liberals bleeding over to the GOP.

 

Confirmation that the amount of unnecessary capitalization for no apparent reason is correlated with being a raving lunatic.

 

For the GOP to win they need to move the map and carry swing states. So far no one in the Republican clown car is capable of doing that

 

I'm very secure in the knowledge that my message and opinions will resonate with 10's of millions of Democrats that are fed up with the HOMOsexual Agenda that is consuming the Democratic Party !!!

 

That's quite the rant. Welcome to PF.

Please don't vote Republican. We could do without your vote. A lot of us are fine with same sex marriage and don't care if it's legalized. Heck, it's one less thing to worry about if it does get legalized.

If it's legalized, it'll probably begin to be downplayed in the media and eventually become a regular thing. Get used to it. Gay people aren't going anywhere. My girlfriend gave me this lecture about 4 years ago. I caught on.

 

Exactly.

That ship sailed.

Time to focus on real issues that affect our nation.

 

I'm not religious at all, but you don't have to be religious to be concerned about the MORAL DECAY OF THIS COUNTRY and the constant pushing of the HOMOsexual AGENDA every night in prime time is contributing to that DECAY. If you don't think this is an issue affecting this country ,you are sadly mistaken !

 

you cant be republican and be fiscally conservative...they are mutually exclusive.

 

Like that Soda tax thing in New York. Why should I be taxed for being fat? "Because you might have heart disease when you're 45.", then I'll get it checked out at 45 but not now and not at the cost of my own pocket thank you. I too would like to avoid Social Issues in their entirety because I see them as paux issues with no right answer that just gives Democrats a percentage of votes and popular opinion.

It's a Democratic tactic to stray from the fact that as one Democratic Operative put it in the Mid-terms: "We can't run on the Economy". Of course not, raising the minimum wage is their only economic thesis. And even if we should raise the minimum wage, that will do NOTHING in terms of real job growth which will produce real wealth growth.

For far too long, the GOP has fallen for these tactics of using Social Issues as a means for elective purposes. For the GOP to retake the Presidency, it must eliminate these Social Issues from public concern. Either by consenting to the public changes, or by augmenting its argument to be coherent to the voting populace.

Either way we go, once we eliminate Social Issues from the public sphere, we get back to POLITICAL issues. The debt, both National as well as Trade Deficits. We go back to our geopolitical situation and what we need to do about the Iranian Crisis, opening up trade markets where it can be beneficial to both. Namely: E.U and the US should see eye to eye, as we're connected through common heritage, language and goals in our respective spheres of influence. How can we expand the job market in the 21st century? How can we improve Education?

All of these real, political goals and aspirations can be put to the front, and we know that we the GOP are superior on every issue. Liberals have dominated Education since 1970 and have gotten NAUGHT to show for it. Wouldn't the country like to hear GOP solutions to the crisis? The GOP isn't anti-business and in fact our business ties are well known. Because we know business, we can actually propose things that work.

We don't need an artificial wage gimmick to rebuild our economic structure, we have hard working GOP members who are presently attempting for a solution. The Mack Plan was a perfect proposal that should've been adopted. A mere 1% cut across the Federal Budget over 10 years balancing it out? One would think Liberals be pleased with such a low cost for a noble goal. But apparently not.

There are many, many more things we can do. But before we do, the GOP need a revitalization of its own. We can't be the "Grand Old Party" and expect to accomplish major and beneficial changes in the legislative arena. Who here believes John McCain, Mitch McConnell and John Boehner are aspirations for the future? Or heck, Lindsey Graham? These are old war dogs who want to keep their jobs as long as humanly possible and they keep the Senate operating as a "Yes man" for Washington.

Little change will and has come from that department of thought. We must double down our support for the TP, and for other alternatives, for a new and stronger Coalition of Right-Wingers, which is no longer a term meaning the GOP but a term for all those who oppose Liberalism.

 

"Moral decay" is a pretty subjective term. Since when is it the government's role to dictate morality?

 

Translation: Democrats only vote for whomever the Mainstream Media (functioning as the ongoing propaganda arm of the Democratic Party) tells them to vote for.

Yeah . . . we know. It's the independents and swing voters however that the MSM has to convince while the 2016 run for the presidency is so far represented in the flesh only by Queen Hillary . . . whom even most Democrats don't really like all that much. Ooops!

 

Maybe you should ask that Question of Historians that have witnessed the Fall of many civilizations ,Like the entire ROMAN EMPIRE that collasped from MORAL DECAY !

 

It will only affect you if you allow it to. I'm an atheist and as another Republican poster just said - we have to get these social issues out of our minds and concentrate on what really matters. I don't even KNOW what the "homosexual agenda" is - and I strongly suspect you don't either. You're just blowing off steam.

What are you trying to protect? Marriage? To me - and I've been married a long time - what hurts the institution of marriage is people who get married for a few hours - like Brittany Spears did.

But, committing - really committing your life to another person hurts no one. And, it very well might help society when it comes to homosexuals because it probably reduces promiscuity. How is reducing promiscuity not "moral?"

I don't know what you've got going but I'm not interested in keeping folks from seeking happiness. That sounds way too much like the progressives/liberals of the day.

I'm more interested in preserving the Constitution and fostering a true free market system.

 

It's going to be hard for Republicans to win Independents if the totality of their push for the White House is, "We hate gay people! We hate gay people!".

 

And that would be a silly simplification of the decay of the Roman Empire. And as it slowly disintegrated over hundreds of years - "collapsed" is hardly the descriptive word historians would use.

 

Then it's probably a good thing that -- despite increasingly hysterical claims by some fanatical leftists to the contrary -- it's not a significant segment of their political efforts to date.

 

In politics, perception is reality - and right now, all we are hearing from Fox is the gay thing. And if the OP is any indication, it's going to stay that way.

 

Well now in that statement we can agree in that in political perception (i.e. propaganda) is reality for sooooooo very many chronically low-information Dem Party voters. Otherwise Barack Obama would not have gotten put inside the Oval Office twice. Propaganda is a powerful thing, but its effectiveness depends on many issues and this is neither 2008 nor 2012.

 

Rome did not collapse because of moral decay. It collapsed because of a multitude of events including political, economic, and military blunders.

Moral decay is the favorite excuse used by Christian fundamentalists.

 

That is the problem. In the last election, Republicans ran on those many issues - yet all we see is that once they got into office, those other issues were too hard for them to tackle, so they went after legislation against gay people and reproduction rights. No jobs bills. No tax reform. Just anti-gay legislation.

Why should Independents trust the Republicans any more than the Democrats?