Results of Putin´s economical politic"Russia looks like it doesn’t deserve to be plac

Results of Putin´s economical politic" now Russia looks like it doesn’t deserve to be placed(BRIC )with the others"

 

Litwin you are joking right, it is the US & Europe that is in danger of going bankrupt, not Russia. And the quote form the Economist article mentions 2006, is it now 2013? Link please.

 

Litwin, you silly necroposter. It is 2013 year outdoors. For now the worst performer in BRICS is Brazil with 0.9% GDP growth. Still can't see "terrible results of corrupt Brasilian government" and "Brasil is about to crumble!" anywhere. Free press much?

 

not me, economist . not really as long as Germany economy is ruling

 

here we go

http://www.economist.com/node/18333018

 

Article from Mar 10th 2011.

Anyway, what does that prove exactly? I told you that now they are worst prformer. They are.

 

it proves that the economist can be critical not only towards mother Russia. so there is no economist conspiracy against your county

 

I can't see where it is "critical". Autor in that silly Economist article for retards only gives you doubtful claim, that measuring GDP in (PPP) is "wrong". It is not. (PPP) fits much better in calculating real economical output and not allowing developed countries to over-estimate their GDP with higher prices. In other words agitator says you "ze West is so STRONG!!!111". Still nothing critical towards Brasil.

Of cource there is no economist conspiracy. Economist simply follows Party line. Ahead to the liberalism, comrades!

Next time try harder/

 

its a very critical read it first,

i live in the "west", and i have no illusion about it. then "Brazil" is not the real west, in a fact the most people in Scandinavia see Russia more "the west" then Brazil

 

Thanks for the link Litwin. So Russia is doing quite well in fourth place & India as well in sixth place.

 

with out "purchasing power", statistic for 2010

 

It is not. Nothing critical at all.

Originally I was stating that Economist just follows in line with western establishment and their wishes. I wasn't saying Brazil is "west".
And, of course, I give a (*)(*)(*)(*) about what people in Scandinavia think about Russia. Whatever.


It is nice to see you are not arguing, that original artical is so outdated and proved to be wrong.

So, in conclusion, economist is biased propaganda magasine and those who believe it are out of reality.

 

All BRIC countries doing better than UK in 2010,

http://http://www.economywatch.com/economies-in-top/?page=full

And the following are estimates for 2012.

http://http://useconomy.about.com/gi/o.htm?zi=1/XJ&zTi=1&sdn=useconomy&cdn=newsissues&tm=65&f=00&su=p284.13.342.ip_p504.6.342.ip_&tt=11&bt=1&bts=1&zu=https%3A//www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2001rank.html

 

Here is my version. China is in first place, the Russia on the second place and the United States have the third place in economic scale. The EU place is only to be in the ass.
Even do not need some abstract numbers, and all so obvious.

 

any link?

 

I think so. Or may be your own Russian TV Falk tell you more truth?

 

i dont own TV chancels. i see you have your own reality unfortunately statistics disagree ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)
List by the United Nations (2011) N10. List by the International Monetary Fund (2012 estimate) N9 List by the World Bank (1990–2011) N 9

- - - Updated - - -

i dont own TV chancels. i see you have your own reality unfortunately statistics disagree ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_%28nominal%29
List by the United Nations (2011) N10. List by the International Monetary Fund (2012 estimate) N9 List by the World Bank (1990–2011) N 9

 

Russia has like 120m people , GNP has a lot to do with population .
Vast country with low population , unlimited resources and not part of the euroscum, what can go wrong ?

 

That is a good all Gebbels-like try to manipulate the opinion of public. I learnt it as a child during the collapse of USSR. The question is "Do you agree with 'Economist'?" Of course most people would agree with a well-known magazine or a professional. But there was no detail that people actually know that they agree to! So the agreement without thinking goes first and then come the details... How childish.

 

unlimited resources is a huge problem , very view countries could handle this problem ...Canada, and Norway and this is it...