If I knew the shots were dangerous, why didn't POTUS? With the luxury of 18 months worth of hindsight, I was right, he was miserably wrong. He had a choice to learn the truth (if he was capable of it) same as I did. He had the choice to speak the truth, but lacked the courage to say what Kennedy Jr. has written his book about. He chose to get his children to take some money from CARES Act, and to play along with Fauci's scam. We are digressing.
You might be right, and you might be wrong. We both can only speculate about that, but the fact is that government and pharma are actively pushing those shots. 49 state governors have ordered such shots. Only DeSantis refuses.
It's still a lock for the GOP to win the House in November. A woman's pregnant person's right to kill her zer unborn child is simply not the vote-motivator that Dems seem to believe it is.
There's a difference between making them available for the people who want them, and requiring them. It is definitely the left that loves abortion, and it is definitely the left that wants to destroy those who choose not to get the "vaccine". I mean the evidence there is quite broad. I don't think any state except for heavily democrat states required injections/masks for children (or at least tried and changed their mind when they got backlash). Covid tyranny is a construct created entirely by the left. Thankfully my last kid in high school didn't have to wear masks after the first couple months of covid and none are required to be injected with mRNA nonsense. Locally most people chose the J&J, which isn't an mRNA vaccine.
He's not a scientist, for one. He trusted that companies would create a product to help people instead of harm them. We only know about how bad they are because a judge denied their attempts to hide their research for 75 years. Much of what we know about the vaccines didn't come out till he was out of office. At no point did he ever try to mandate it, as Biden said he wouldn't, lied, and tried to do it anyway. Trump was beset on all sides by enemies. How he managed to get done what he did was a miracle.
Uh duhh it applied to men...see , women don't have penises but can be just as stupid , backwards and misogynistic as men.. . When one's right to their own body is taken away that is slavery.... WHERE in the Constitution does it ban abortion?
Should be? If you want a Constitutional Amendment, Article V declares how that is accomplished, it's not by bullying 5 unelected judges into your position. If you want National Legislation, Article I tells you how that is accomplished, and again, it's not by bullying five justices into your position. And, are you a biologist?
Where do you get I'm ignoring other options? Out of thin air? Women should have a right to choose all the options and not be prevented by a political viewpoint, which is not the peoples will (70%). The three dissenting judges also agreed the argument used in overturning Roe v Wade could overturn gay marriage and contraceptive rights. A right-wing win win.
LOL! You post exactly like a jilted ex-girlfriend: "control of the House? I never liked that anyways"
I'm not a scientist either, but maybe I've been around the medical and pharmaceutical field more than he has. He trusts pharma, I don't. Pfizer pleaded guilty to criminal medical fraud in 2004 and 2009. They are still doing it, meaning they've been operating a continuing criminal enterprise for decades. No wonder some attorneys are talking about RICO charges.
Did you read the dissenting opinions to see their legal arguments? I haven't yet, but simply saying something doesn't make it so. Without a logical/legal argument even the SC justices are engaging in hyperbole or fear mongering. Neither is a winning argument.
In other words, women should not have sex. This is sort of like telling people they should refrain from defecating to save the sewers.
I had sex multiple times without getting any one pregnant. My first sexual partner used the pill. I'll always be grateful that she was the smart one.
