Romney now has 19 pants on fire statements. Almost 3 times as many as a sitting Pres.

Right. Sorry if that isn't to your liking, and I can understand why you want it finished before the election, but that's not reality because it's not going to happen, and nobody can say for sure as of now what Obama did right or wrong himself regarding the issue.

 

I can say that he lied for sure. I can say that his empty chair is responsible for the tragedy to begin with. I can say that people who are willing to vote for him in spite of this can go sit in the corner with all the other traitors to this country.

 

Oh its the "facts have a Liberal bias" argument eh?

 

Absolutely. You can say whatever you like.

 

Why don't you read the thread before you respond with a useless not so clever retort.

 

7 is waaaaaaay too many. 19 is at the point where I lose faith in humanity in the section of the population who voted for Romney.

 

Then vote for Obama. Have faith in your Messiah's lies when he lies right to your face for weeks on national TV.

 

Which he doesn't do, but romney sure does.

I have to admire your blindness to romney's lies in a weird sort of way. I've never run across someone so partisan and so blind to that partisanship that they refuse to admit any fault in their candidate, despite the clear evidence. All the while continuing to claim the other candidate's guilt despite the total lack of evidence.
You've taken blind partisanship to a new low.

 

Sure he doesn't. And Benghazi was just a little protest over an internet video that got a little out of hand.

And Romney lied about what? Oh yeah, the 5 trillion dollar tax cut for the wealthy. I have seen that video with that promise all over the internet...not! I guess that was just another obama lie!

 

Okay, where is the fact check on obama for lying about a 5 trillion dollar tax cut for the wealthy? Because you really cannot fact check Romney on it because he never said he was giving a 5 trillion dollar tax cut to the wealthy.

How about fact checking obama on the lie that the attack was a demonstration about a video that got out of hand? There is absolutely no evidence for that, in fact we know now that there was no demonstration at all. Where is the fact check on that lie?