Ron Paul Supporters:

i've been watching his career for more than 30 years, ron paul panders to ignorance

 

Just vote for Ron Paul, Johnson and Paul both have libertarian leaning views, Paul in more in line with Johnson then any of then other candidates.

Whatever, I am sure the rest of the field will commit political suicide before this is all over, and if you vote on the right, the choice will be clear.

There is so much a POTUS can do btw, and RP can get rid of all the BS executive orders on the books, (which actually have no legal binding) the rest of his plan would depend alot on what the houses look like but I have a feeling its going to be heavy on the right. Obozo has done a great job of screwing crap up.

Oh well, on to bigger things, Been fun. Cheers!

 

Is that why you've been following it?

Like a moth to light, have you been?

 

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol_kQX2HOz4&"]SA@TheDC - 'Fixing' Big Government is Not Conservative - YouTube[/ame]

 

We NEED this kind of ignorance in the white house.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnuoHx9BINc"]Ron Paul Predicts Housing Bubble 5 Years Before it Burst - YouTube[/ame]

 

But at least Ron Paul know China has nuke since the 60's.....

 

That's like saying "just eat lobster" when I don't eat seafood. (*)(*)(*)(*) Ron Paul. Seriously, he is a piece of (*)(*)(*)(*). If he is nominated I will not vote. Without adequate foreign policy a candidates domestic policy is meaningless to me.

 

i was studying economics and finance at university in the 1970's, ron used to give talks at various places, i saw him speak in dallas and signed up for his newsletter

the newsletter and ron are certainly not light

ron paul is a practiced liar

 

That's your call, but when he gets elected you have to just sit down and **** then, right?

If you got the newsletter in the 70's or even the 80's then it was'nt coming from Dr. Paul, but a staffer from my understanding.

So you're a Keynesian Econ guy then? Well, there you have it. print print print. tax tax tax

 

He's not going to get elected.

 

​

 

it came from ron paul's own company, ron's staffer and campaign manager, jean mciver took orders over the phone

wrong, it's obvious you don't know what you're talking about

 

Well, since I've read some of what you believe in I will take this as a compliment.

Thanks.

 

it's no compliment to not know what you're talking about

 

Again, this is according to you, and from where I sit, you're deaf, dumb and blind so you're assessment of me is a good one. Again, thanks.

 

you assumed i was a keynesian and you seemed to think ron paul wasn't connected to his own newsletter, face it, you were wrong

 

If I was wrong I surely I would admit it, but I don't think I was, you have yet to say what you are as far as an economist and as far as RP's news letter, of course he is connected to it, its his news letter, what I said was he didn't write it, that's what I said.

So far you are Mr.Hyperbole.

 

i'm an pragmatist and i don't adhere to any one school

he wrote pieces in the newsletters, for example:

"In 1988 when I ran for president on the Libertarian Party ticket, I was berated for hours by LP members because I had refused to vote, while in Congress, for a Martin Luther King national holiday."

 

I love that one, always looking out for the tax payer, also voted against that "thing" for Rosa Parks too, I mean why have the tax payer pay the salaries for these already lazy do nothings to have another paid day off, why?

I wish I could vote for him twice! I forgot about that quote, he's a a real patriot!

 

the point that you seem to miss is that ron paul wrote pieces in the newsletters

 

At least he knows what a loan is.

 

purchasing treasury securities doesn't make a bank loan

the federal reserve isn't permitted to make loans to congress

 

It's a loan.

Then they better stop lending them money.

 

you're wrong

 

Treasury securities are instruments to finance Government debt. Since the holders of these securities are paid interest, it's a loan. It's only a matter of semantics to say otherwise.