SEE, there's another of your errors. Women can have all the sex they damn please JUST LIKE MEN....and if they have an unwanted pregnancy they can get an abortion... I NEVER SAID IT WAS SO THAT MAKES YOU A L---. ( we are not allowed to use the "L" word in here... Anti-Choicers NEED to ""Misrepresent" what others say because they have no facts at all... NO ONE is turning women into anything except for Anti-Choicers who want them turned into cattle, obedient, docile cattle so they can be managed EXACTLY LIKE SLAVES..
Georgia Governor KempRadical politicians seizing control of wombs in states attempting to integrate into and benefit from the national economy will bear the consequences in the form of lost revenue from industry and tourism. Boycotts will ensue as happened with statist bathroom edicts. Alabama politicians who voted to force a 12-year-old rape victim to bear the consequences of her having being raped for nine months.
FoxHastings said: ↑ SO WHAT! It just shows black women have as much right to abortion as white women....do you object? You ONLY have a point IF you can prove black women were FORCED to have abortions and NO one has proven that yet. Now, I answered your question, why can't you answer my question? It just shows black women have as much right to abortion as white women....do you object?
YUP! And "personal" is the key word. It is PERSONAL NOT the business of Big Government or nosy, self righteous busy bodies. It is very responsible for a woman to abort a pregnancy if she doesn't want or can't afford a kid... WHO do you think you are to determine "responsibility" for the entire world???/
FoxHastings said: ↑ SEE, there's another of your errors. Women can have all the sex they damn please JUST LIKE MEN....and if they have an unwanted pregnancy they can get an abortion... I NEVER SAID IT WAS SO THAT MAKES YOU A L---. ( we are not allowed to use the "L" word in here... Anti-Choicers NEED to ""Misrepresent" what others say because they have no facts at all... NO ONE is turning women into anything except for Anti-Choicers who want them turned into cattle, obedient, docile cattle so they can be managed EXACTLY LIKE SLAVES.. """What I word".....and you call me clueless ? Clueless would refer to those who can't address the post they quoted
LOL... Only if someone recognizes your asinine standard? Laughable. When publicly funded abortion becomes accessible it takes the notion of personal responsibility out of the equation, removes the need for other contraceptive intervention, and makes casual medical procedure out of abortive services. I just don't get the reason you'd ignore this. So, for you, if folks were forcing people to get abortions, that would be different? Ok, why? If a young woman decides that to further her career and gets an abortion, how isn't that being "forced into that decision? If your community tells you not to "ruin your life", how is that also not forcing folks? And to what end? To make folks less encumbered so they can work? That sounds remarkably like a designed outcome to me.
FoxHastings said: ↑ You ONLY have a point IF you can prove black women were FORCED to have abortions and NO one has proven that yet. Now, I answered your question, why can't you answer my question? It just shows black women have as much right to abortion as white women....do you object? All that asinine gibberish sure didn't answer my question.
FoxHastings said: ↑ YUP! And "personal" is the key word. It is PERSONAL NOT the business of Big Government or nosy, self righteous busy bodies. It is very responsible for a woman to abort a pregnancy if she doesn't want or can't afford a kid... WHO do you think you are to determine "responsibility" for the entire world???/ AS USUAL, you have NO PROOF that I ever said "murdering babies is a good thing"....and saying I did is flamebait. You just can't answer those inconvenient questions.....
FoxHastings said: ↑ YUP! And "personal" is the key word. It is PERSONAL NOT the business of Big Government or nosy, self righteous busy bodies. It is very responsible for a woman to abort a pregnancy if she doesn't want or can't afford a kid... WHO do you think you are to determine "responsibility" for the entire world???/ AS USUAL, you have NO PROOF that I ever said "murdering babies is a good thing"....and saying I did is flamebait. You just can't answer those inconvenient questions..... Too bad you didn't read my post....
If that is true, African-American women need to start practicing better birth control. But, they should still have the right to choose.
What would make huge difference is availability of affordable long acting reliable contraception But you will not hear any of the anti abortionists suggesting that
Malicious slander is a feeble weapon for zealots to wield in their fanatical demand that politicians seize control of wombs. Abortions represent 3% of total services provided to women by Planned Parenthood - all legal under US law. Planned Parenthood cannot use the money it receives from the federal government for abortions. According to the Department of Health and Human Service’s website, "by law, Title X funds may not be used in programs where abortion is a method of family planning." Medicaid funding is restricted by the Hyde Amendment to only abortion cases involving rape, incest or endangerment to the life of the mother. https://www.factcheck.org/2011/04/planned-parenthood/ There are currently 26 countries on earth where all abortions are illegal. It does not matter if the pregnancy is a result of rape or incest. Alabama aspires to join their maximal statist ranks: http://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/countries-where-abortion-is-illegal/
And yet PP by assisting women to get affordable reliable birth control have prevented more abortions than any group of rabid right wimpngers
Yes, bodily autonomy is a right. With that stated, what of the right of the child to his or her bodily autonomy?
I am going to take a wild stab at this. You ask who would choose abortion over reliable contraception? My answer is: a loose female (a slattern).
No, it isn't just "loose women" that get abortions. "loose women" "slatterns" ?? Hilarious ..the 19th century still has it's fans.....
When gestation has progressed to the point that a viable person exists, society recognizes it has rights. Some claim that a microscopic mindless amalgam of cells is a person, but there is no reason for society to inflict the notion of such extremists upon everyone else.
1. It's not a person 2. Who was there first? There's a saying: possession is 9/10 of the law. The mother possesses her own body. The fetus lives within the mother's body in a parasitic relationship. That matters. The mother has rights to her own body, the fetus has rights to its own body (assuming it's a person), and these rights are in conflict, so somebody's going to win and lose. Why should the fetus be the winner? It shouldn't, unless the agenda is not a right-to-life, but control. That's what this is all about: control. Because if the people who are pushing abortion laws actually cared about infants, there would be universal neo-natal care, and universal pediatric care, and paid maternity leave, and the pro-life movement (aka conservatives) have fought against these things tooth and nail and still fight against them. Once the kid is born, it might as well die of malnutrition, for all they care.
