Senate Democrats just released full testimony on the Trump-Russia dossier. Here's what's in it

Paywall please follow forum rules when posting.

 

There is no paywall for either of those links unless you exceeded your own limits.

 

Yes there is the NYT paywalls

 

The other link does NOT have a paywall.

 

Shoe on the other foot? Nunes held a press conference on the white noise lawn to reveal info he didn't share with the rest of the committee!
Feinstein released testimony by a witness who begged someone to as it was being used against him.

 

What was being used against him, is his OWN words. He himself confessed that he couldn't collaborate the document, Steele couldn't either and as for their sources? When asked, he didn't even bother to give them. Citing a letter that I'm supposed to believe the committee didn't read, or specifically tailor their questions to PRIOR to the testimony.

LOL. He should be brought back under oath. They should've pressed harder for the answers to THEIR questions. That's not a "right-wing talking point", that's their questions and the guy they questioned was like 'Nope, not gonna answer. You'll have to settle with me rambling on about my other irrelevant cases.'

If I was on committee, I would have been openly pissed.

 

Nunes is a member of the Gang of 8. He is not allowed to share intelegence hehas access fo as a member of the Gang of 8 with the rest of the committee.

Shows what you know.

 

Nunes most certainly did NOT release ANY details, let alone RELEASE the classified docs he veiwed at the secure facility. When might Feinstein release Carter Pages transcripts ... as he's demanded? Ditto, Paul Manafort. Feinstein doesn't fool anyone. Let's see the GPS financials. Payments to the AG's wife, Natalia, Golstone? Simpsons testimonial transcripts (alibi) doesn't reveal anything that Simpson hasn't been lying about, publicly, for months. Feinstein is is selling a narrative.

 

And Nunes had a ethics complaint filed against him and had to sit on the bench for a few months till the complaint was investigated from which they concluded no violation was committed
so tell me would you agree Feinstein should now be benched?

 

Feinstein knows what she did, going as far as claiming she had a cold or some other lame bull like that which caused her to "forget" to get permission from the committee to do so.

Funny how she somehow pulled it together long enough to have Simpson choose which sections to redact before doing so.

Can you explain why Simpson waited so long to correct his lie about having a mole in the Trump organization?

Feinstein screwed the country for party. She should be removed from any committee positions in recognition of her failures as a member of Congress and US Senate. Perhaps someone should give her a mental examination

 

Anyone else savoring the angry tears of the alt right as they wail about the truth regarding their BLOTUS being revealed to the nation and the world?

 

What truth even they are walking back ( lying) about their claims of a mole ( which was a lie to begin with)

 

Link?

 

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jan/13/glenn-simpson-believes-fbi-has-mole-inside-trump-t/

 

And your source for that claim is what?

 

How did this screw the country?

 

How?

It involves an investigation the Senate Judiciary Committee is conducting. There is a reason Simpson was questioned in closed session. Feinstein just revealed all his answers, with a few choice ones he apparently told her to redact. Any future witness who might have surfaced as a result of the investigation just got all the answers they need to give.

Feinstein decided the people don't deserve to know all the truth.

 

As with 99% of gleeful leftist Trump hating threads around here once it gets analyzed and discussed... Their glee turns too silence after looking ignorant again. Feinstein is crazier than a June bug and represents everything that is wrong with the current Democratic party.

 

If that was ever an issue then why did grassley initially say they'd have a vote to release it?

 

Rather self evident isn't it? Feinstein took care of that, didn't she? Apparently she thought her vote was greater than anyone else on the Committee.

 

You mean the vote that never happened?? Lmao he testified months ago!

 

What does having a vote about something mean to you?

 

Doesnt matter since no vote occurred

 

You mean the vote Feinstein made moot?

 

Because months had passed with no action. It became clear grassley was going to continue to obstruct.