Senate Intel Concludes Russia Intervened In 2016 To Boost Trump

Have to see it first.

 

Yet a year later you haven’t read them?

 

If this is Trump's position on the matter of the DNC server, it would not be the first time he was wrong about something. I would look forward to any evidence they care to share, but until they do, the evidence presented so far shows that the files were downloaded locally, not hacked via internet.

 

Claims of evidence or actual evidence?

 

That ignores all the evidence laid out in the Russian indictments. Did the trump DOJ fabricate evidence? Why do those indictments still stand??

 

Do you think the trump DOJ fabricated evidence to get those indictments?

 

Have you seen it?
Can you share and I'll answer?

 

Post the indictments. I think you are having difficulty discerning the difference between "evidence" and "claims of evidence".

 

Haha, oh yeah, the Kremlin was what finally pushed me over the edge to vote for Trump. I was sooooo close to voting for the hildabeast.

 

You haven’t cared enough to read it in the last year, but I’m supposed to go find the indictments for you?

 

So maybe the trump DOJ just lied about their evidence to get indictments? That’s your claim? Lol

 

My claim, in layman's terms, is that you don't know what you are talking about.

 

I didn't say indictments, I said evidence.
No evidence is contained in the indictments

 

So you have no explanation for the detailed claims of proof the DOJ gave for the indictment of the Russian hackers?

 

Gotcha. So either they have the evidence showing it was Russia or they lied to the GJ.

 

Odd you would take a "do or die" position on a matter that you have no evidence for.

 

How many were convicted? Indictments mean nothing.

 

did they change the numbers in the ballot boxes? didnt think so.

 

So it’s ok to get indictments based on fake evidence?

 

Haven't seen it to make that determination.
Either have you

 

I think you responded to the wrong post. I’m asking about the DOJ indictments of Russian hackers

 

I’ve read the indictments. You haven’t. Why not?

 

Not at all. I just see nothing supporting these claims.

 

If the hackers didnt change the numbers then who cares?

 

You said that, not him