Which fact witnesses did the dems refuse to hear from? howcdid Sondland admitting a QPQ exonerate trump? Lmao
"The President told me: "I want nothing, no quid pro quo. Nothing. I want him to do the right thing"-Ambassador Sondland.
40 million dollars worth of personal gain in just eight years. From the lowest level of base line millionaire to super millionaire in the equivalent of overnight. Sweet!
~ When someone - or a group - is constantly aware of and makes reference to race / ethnicity / sexuality they likely are indeed racist and/or prejudice. Thankfully most take notice of who a person is - not what they are .
Bribery would be an actual crime. You can continue to fool yourself into believing the dem clown show.
The IRS -- you know -- Obama's pit bull, also knows how Trump made his money; which is why Trump doesn't need YOUR approval of his taxes. Freedom from political persecution and pogroms . . . go figure.
Democrats be like... sorry, we can't support you. We already have an (insert race/sex here) person here. We care what race/sex people are.... Racist....
and once again, biased polls are used... 70% of people polled were of other than republican/conservatives... https://poll.qu.edu/images/polling/us/us01132020_demos_ufrk33.pdf/
What is it you think Bolton is going to tell you that you don't already know? He was not part of the impeachment. The Democrats did not make anything about him part of the impeachment. The vote to impeach did not involve any testimony of Bolton. The Democrats said the evidence they have is overwhelming and conclusive. Why are they now trying to introduce new things, the vote is supposed to be on the impeachment that occurred.
And on what date did Trump communicate that to Sondland?? Think hard, because it's very important..... Here's a thought I just had.... The House is going to vote tomorrow on a resolution to send the articles to the Senate and name the House managers.. How does the GOP vote? Against it (because everything they do is against everything) or For it?? LOL... to paraphrase David St. Hubbins, "It's not our job to be as confused as them"
It was the Democrats who were in such a hurry and then waited a month. And yes it has to be presented and then scheduled. Were it not for Pelosi we could have been over this a month ago. So why are you whining about McConnell.
Whatever he and his lawyer have been not-so-subtly hinting at for 2 months... https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2019/11/08/john-bolton-ex-trump-national-security-adviser-has-new-ukraine-info-might-testify-if-courts-rule/2532224001/ Just might have been a different story if Mustache-Mouth had kept his shut...
If you didn't pay attention to the impeachment that is your own fault. And yeah the fix is the vast majority of the Democrats are voting to remove.
They were trying to hack everyone, the RNC didn't fall for it. How did the DNC hack hurt Clinton and her campaign? Didn't they tell the tale of a devoted and patriotic staff complying with all campaign finance laws and acting at every instance on the higher moral ground? What was damaging in them?
How many of those years were they trying to impeach the President especially when the majority say don't remove?
They were trying to hack everyone including the RNC who didn't fall for it. They held anti-Trump rally's. They were trying to sow general discord and didn't do anything that effected the election.