Should the entire report be made public? If not, why not?

Discussion in 'Opinion POLLS' started by modernpaladin, Apr 6, 2019.

?

Should the entire Mueller report be made public?

  1. I lean left, it should be made public.

    5 vote(s)
    33.3%
  2. I lean right, it should be made public.

    5 vote(s)
    33.3%
  3. I lean left, parts of it should remain secret.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. I lean right, parts of it should remain secret.

    5 vote(s)
    33.3%
  1. modernpaladin

    modernpaladin Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2017
    Messages:
    27,967
    Likes Received:
    21,271
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Should the Mueller report be made public in its entirety?

    I think it should. I've always believed the Russia Collusion delusion was a giant hoax and I still do. But I long ago lost any trust in politicians or our government. They have not demonstrated that they can be trusted to hide anything.

    I think the reasons to release the entire thing are pretty obvious. What I can't fathom is why anyone would support keeping it secret. So I wanna find out who does- and why?
     
  2. Capt Nice

    Capt Nice Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2017
    Messages:
    9,998
    Likes Received:
    10,217
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Release in total to Congress. Let Congress determine what is too sensitive for the general public and should be redacted.
     
  3. Liberty Monkey

    Liberty Monkey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2018
    Messages:
    10,856
    Likes Received:
    16,450
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Can we apply the same standard as the Benghazi report?
    benghazi report.png

    Mueller should decide what's redacted not congress.

    I think you should ask the doctor for some more of those happy pills he gives you the run up to 2020 will not be kind for you.
     
    Last edited: Apr 6, 2019
  4. Sallyally

    Sallyally Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2017
    Messages:
    15,865
    Likes Received:
    28,306
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Open it up to the air so that there aren't any secrets.
     
    modernpaladin likes this.
  5. Liberty Monkey

    Liberty Monkey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2018
    Messages:
    10,856
    Likes Received:
    16,450
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Redactions are often to protect the innocent, redactions of names, address's I think should not be considered "insidious" depending on circumstances.

    If Mueller looked at you even if it was innocuous Rachel Maddow would make your life hell until you killed yourself. There has to be some protection from the wolves for innocent.

    I think the Mueller report will be released with minimal redactions and regardless Rachel Maddow and 70% of this forum will still claim Russian Collusion and probably Mueller has been gotten to because doubling down is easier than facing the truth.
     
  6. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's called the laws Congress passed. No one is keeping it secret but not releasing sources and methods that could damage national security or grand jury information about people not indicted is the law.
     
    Bondo likes this.
  7. Sallyally

    Sallyally Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2017
    Messages:
    15,865
    Likes Received:
    28,306
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    I believe Robert Mueller is a man of probity and I'd not hesitate to trust his judgment.
    He was impartial in his report of his interview with POTUS.
     
    Liberty Monkey likes this.
  8. btthegreat

    btthegreat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2010
    Messages:
    16,424
    Likes Received:
    7,083
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I do recognize that there will be sensitive information, sources etc that simply cannot be public without endangering lives and counter-intelligence missions. This investigation depended largely on information testimony or documents gathered by the FBI and CIA in Russia or through internet /phone communication with Russian sources. Beyond those concerns requiring redacting, release it all.
     
    Last edited: Apr 7, 2019
  9. AGWisFAKEsillyBABYKILLERS

    AGWisFAKEsillyBABYKILLERS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2017
    Messages:
    1,321
    Likes Received:
    877
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It would put clinton and obama behind bars.. Do it!
     
    Bondo likes this.
  10. Crawdadr

    Crawdadr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2009
    Messages:
    7,293
    Likes Received:
    1,495
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    They should redact anything that could harm an innocent person or reveal intelligence sources. So i said do not reveal it in its entirety
     
    Liberty Monkey likes this.
  11. Pollycy

    Pollycy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    29,922
    Likes Received:
    14,183
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Release every single word -- hold nothing back! If anything is held back, all factions will find excuses to hurl sh!t at everybody else, cry "foul", be "outraged", etc., etc.

    Worried about 'sensitive' information being devulged? DON'T. Any intel agency anywhere in the world worth a damn will already know everything about this whole disgusting "snipe-hunt safari", from one sickening end to the other. There certainly wouldn't be any surprises to first-class intelligence services like those found in Russia, Germany, China, or Great Britain. So, let it all go!
     
    Day of the Candor and Sallyally like this.
  12. Day of the Candor

    Day of the Candor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,458
    Likes Received:
    142
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Yep. Don't hold back a single word or the Democrats will be screaming that there was a coverup. No redactions, and nothing with a big black line through it. Democrats will whine if it doesn't have anything in it accusing Trump of crimes but at least everyone will get to see the whole truth.
     

Share This Page