Single Teen Mom? Texas's Wendy Davis Lied About Life Story

This link does not in any way provide any evidence to back your assertion.

DIVORCE MINISTRY FOR KIDS!!!???

COME ON!!! LOL!!!

AboveAlpha

 

What exactly is your bone of contention?

 

Well, it does let us know who is responding.
In case the large, bold font before the comment isn't clear enough.

- - - Updated - - -

Lol. Funny.

Besides, Wendy is small potatoes.
She has a long way to go before she reaches the Clinton skillz...

[video=youtube;uHVEDq6RVXc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHVEDq6RVXc[/video]

 

lol @ the LIEberals in this thread trying to defend a BLATANT LIE OF UNIMAGINABLE MAGNITUDE. What else has she lied about? Is she (it) even a woman? Or worse: is she an ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT?!?

I demand to see her birth certificate.

 

This woman is such a gaffe-a-matic as to make Joe Biden look like a paragon of gravitas.

 

Are you arguing their methodology or making blind complaints about the source? Please post pre approved resources and I will get them. Pew is on there, left wing. Also a million graphs courtesy of google search. Let me know which sources you want and I will post them for you.

 

Not the methodology. Did you see he skipped over pew and the thousands of graphs via google?

Besides it is common knowledge single parent homes have been rising fast.

 

opinion on


Not about Palin. It's the hypocritical dichotomy of the Left. A woman who would rather keep her child even though it would be born with Down's Syndrome than abort her baby is attacked, versus Dems supporting a woman who would rather give up her child because of drugs and alcohol, and marries a man solely as a gold digger and supports abortion. It's all about ideology, isn't it.

 

Wow! Now this is psychobabble at it's worst.... or would that be it's best? Either way you win the prize......

To compare a carrot, cabbage, a pulled out hair to a human fetus, a viable late term baby close to birth.....

Please tell me you don't have any kids......

 

Here's a quote from that article from a right-wing media website: "The media tend to protect Democrats--notably, Barack Obama."

 

LOL! I'll tell ya, I read the strangest, most mind blowing comparisons in this place.........

So, Nancy Davis, pregnant, married her man, had her baby, raised her baby and stayed married and very loyal & devoted to her husband - as the whole country saw - has what to do w/this case?

Please explain - I am very curious..........

 

And you didn't know this?

President Obama had his best run of media coverage during the final week of the campaign, while positive coverage of Mitt Romney dwindled, according to a study released Monday from the Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism.

Between October 29 and November 5, the week leading up to the election, 29 percent of stories about Obama were positive, compared to 19 negative, while only 16 percent of Romney’s stories were positive, compared to 33 negative.

http://www.theglobaldispatch.com/pe...bama-media-bias-leading-up-to-election-45066/

But of course Pew is just lying right Pardy?

 

So you're saying it takes a right-winger to state the truth ?

 

I'm saying that it's a right-wing media website claiming that the media has a left-wing slant.

I could put up a graphic that shows Brietbart, NWD, and various racist right-wing "news" sources that protect their values. I could probably find many.

By the way, Helen Thomas is dead.

 

Davis Lied? Well, that's human memory! Oh well, so she was off in her story by a few years, so what?!

If Wendy Davis is anything like me, she isn't a stopwatch counting every second. In fact, I doubt she even counts the years after she requested people stop putting individual candles on her birthday cake.

These are real events from her life, so what if the time of the events is off by a few years, can you do any better? I can't.

Well, this is just her opponents telling you we must stop her because she has failings in her memory, and who knows what other nefarious things she has planned for all of you? But come on it's all silly. Everyone who doesn't hold a grudge can see this is just grasping at straws because her opponents can't find any other dirt to smear her with.

 

You know....I REALLY am not the person you should be attempting to make look stupid in front of others.

You posted this...."Sex Ed has shown a massive increase I single parent homes...end quote JohnMayo.

I asked you to....Please provide a link to a viable and unbiased source to prove your assertion.

And instead of doing that as I KNOW such proof DOES NOT EXIST....because your assertion is PURE IDEOLOGICAL DRIVEN CREATED FANTASY.....you attempted to convince people I asked you to prove something else....by posting...

Not the methodology. Did you see he skipped over pew and the thousands of graphs via google?

Besides it is common knowledge single parent homes have been rising fast....end quote Johny Mayo.


NOW....I will give you a PASS this time around and allow you to ATTEMPT to find a link to a site to provide some kind of data to back your assertion.

If you cannot find such a link....I am asking you at that point to admit to your..."CONFUSION"....and as well admit you were WRONG...if you cannot provide such proof using a viable unbiased link.

So...try again.

AboveAlpha...p.s...next time I will NOT be so forgiving as,,,,you wouldn't like me when i'm angry.

 

Read post 141 on this topic.

AboveAlpha

 

You didn't understand.

My point was since at our current level of technology we can use any one A SINGLE LIVING HUMAN CELL from either a man or woman and use it to create a Human Egg and Human Sperm Cell and Fertilize the egg cell and then with the aid of the newly approved by the Food and Drug administration as well as approved by the AMA...American Medical association....take this created Fertilized Human Egg Cell and implant it in a Artificial Ute rice and grow it in an artificial womb and bring a Fetus to term and birth it without the aid of a Mother.....we now no longer need a Father or a Mother to create a Human Child and the cool thing is that the ONE SINGLE LIVING CELL used we can program it to continue to grow a complete continual line of Human Stem Cells which we can Genetically Program into being either a Girl or Boy or program Height, Intelligence, Eye Color..etc.

So the issue is now that since a Single Living Human Cell of any kind from any part of the Human Body male or female can be used to create and grow a Fetus which we can artificially bring to term and create a Human Being.

This means that ANY LIVING HUMAN CELL has the same potential of becoming a living human being as a Fertilized Egg Cell....and that means any Living Human Cell whether it be a cell on the end of a hair you pulled out of your head while combing your hair at the Follicle or the Living Cells under your FINGER NAILS when you scratched your skin.....OR....THE LIVING HUMAN BLADDER AND BLOOD CELLS THAT EXIST IN URINE WHEN YOU URINATE OR THE LIVING HUMAN RECTUM AND COLON CELLS EXISTING IN YOUR WASTE WHEN A PERSON DEFECATES!!!!

So since all Living Human Cells from any part of the Human Body are now POTENTIALLY A HUMAN BEING...as we only need ONE LIVING HUMAN CELL....to create and grow a Fetus to full term to become a Human Being....does this mean that avid Pro-Lifer's will be standing inside all Mean ans Ladies Rooms with Bottles and Baggies to catch the Urine and Solid Human Waste before we flush it down the toilet because such Human Waste has within it LIVING HUMAN CELLS which are now all potential Human Beings?

I can see the Pro-Life Bumper Stickers now....IT'S NOT S#!%....IT'S A BABY!!!!

LOL!!!!

So...do you get it now!!!

The reality is that a Fertilized Human Egg or even a Fertilized Human Egg implanted in the Uterine Wall and just exists at a point a just a CLUMP OF LIVING CELLS....is no more a Human Being than the Living Human Cells which are themselves now ALL POTENTIAL BABY'S.....no more a Human Being than what we flush down a toilet daily.

You can't have it both way's

AboveAlpha

 

Gotta Love it, Wendy has the right wing nut jobs shaking in their boots, they should be afraid, VERY afraid.

 

Pew research doesn't count either? Give me a name of approved resources.

Why can't a right wing site like this one:

http://www.lifesitenews.com/mobile/...-in-single-parent-homes-has-nearly-doubled-in

Not count? It uses the same census data as the last one. That is why I said why attack the source instead of the methodology? Only the hardcore partisans can't read thoughts from the other side. But here is the direct link to that same data for all the betas out there testing out the Internet:

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s1337.pdf

Up 50% since 1980. Now call it success for me lefty. Now show me how the other sources distorted that data.

Also, this is all common knowledge. Everyone here would have gotten the question right, even Johnny c.

- - - Updated - - -

About what? Another lying democrat? We have seen their kind.

 

You can't grow a new human with a stem cell. DNA evidence proves the child is not the mother but a separate human. Your argument is again weak sauce.

Just admit you think it is OK to kill if it saves someone 8 months of inconvenience. Just admit it. Liberated spiritius was able to admit he would kill for convenience. Why can't you?

 

YOU POSTED THIS!!!!!

You posted this...."Sex Ed has shown a massive increase I single parent homes...end quote JohnMayo.

YOU STATED SEX EDUCATION WAS TO BLAME FOR INCREASES IN SINGLE PARENT HOMES!!!

PROVE SEX ED CAUSED THIS INCREASE!!!!

YOU KEEP POSTING EVERYTHING BUT PROOF SPECIFIC TO SHOWING SEXUAL EDUCATION CAUSED THIS INCREASE AND THIS IS LIKE THE 3RD TIME ALREADY!!!

Either provide proof or apologize and remove your posted assertion.

AboveAlpha

 

Time for you to enter the 21st century.

Geneticists CAN ABSOLUTELY GROW STEM CELLS AND THEN FROM THEM GROW A SPERM AND EGG CELL from a single human cell of any kind from a Male or Female...and then fertilize the egg cell with the sperm cell and CREATE A HUMAN BEING.

We have been able to do this for almost a DECADE NOW!!!

Where the HELL have you been?

AboveAlpha

 

Oh I have to show that is the cause? I meant it is was a massive failure. Sorry for the confusion.

Now argue the spending was a success for me, or is worth it. Not just the dollars, but the time that could be better spent on learning other subjects.

Has anyone here ever had sex with a person that didnt understand what sex was? Really?

Because that is the argument I was having with you.

 

The percentage of unmarried women has increased during the period when lib culture was promoting sex in the public schools through sex education.

Cause and affect?

Probably.

At the least sex education and the loosing of moral standards in schools and pop culture are contributing factors.

But absolute, smoking gun, scientific DNA based proof that libs did it?

No.

It just looks pretty suspicious.