So is black bigger? interesting http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/04/120429152249.htm more basics that everyone should already know I wonder why Einstein didnt know these things.
Cute. The evidence shares that the bb is wrong but you apparently have no idea why. The other funny is; the bb exp has been accepted for almost ever and just now this generation is learning that size is relevant to the em emitted and the old school had no idea. Meaning if the current paradigm was correct they would have already created the theorem predicting the new evidence W
Maybe because dead scientists have trouble keeping up with the latest developments in theory - especially the various technological possibilities for taking advantage of specific aspects and ramifications of a theory that develop much later in the theory's development. Besides that, Einstein, as I'm sure you are aware, had a some fundamental disagreements with quantum indeterminacy and entanglement. He maintained a basic (and quite common) intuition that the physical world doesn't actually behave as a function of various indeterminate statistical superpositions of possible states.
he knew that all is entangled as it a 1 My point fpr that post is so many render Newton, einstein, planck and so many greats as have enable, proved and sustaining the laws of physics, when in fact, the laws are wrong and each have tuched evidence that proves the laws and QM are incomplete and wrong.
Well, the the antagonism between GR and QM at extreme mass-energy densities is common knowledge. A great deal of the problem is related to the fact that mass-energy is modeled as point particles in the classical GR theory, and spacetime is taken to be smooth regardless of the size level under consideration (vs. the vacuum fluctuations implied by QM). This gives rise to divide-by-zero infinities in various calculations as the extremely miniscule sizes of Planck length and smaller are analytically approached. This is one reason why superstring theories don't suffer from theses issues and can quite naturally incorporate gravity at these sizes. Strings are NOT point particles like their classical cousins and therefor don't approach infinite mass-energy densities in the theoretical analysis where GR/QM inconsistencies normally reveal themselves and bring forth meaningless solutions.
