So When Do REPUBS IMPEACH BIDEN?

The GOP does not control the senate and no political party controls everything the next two years. This means that it is not a GOP legislation nor Democratic, but a compromise. I know the word compromise is a dirty word for the MEGA crowd, but that is reality. And if the GOP controls the house by 3 votes, then only for Republicans need to say no to the impeachment articles.

 

LOL, says the person who does not know what the DOJ actually does for its mission. they are prosecutors. Mueller was a prosecutor when we worked for the DOJ. So was Durham who personally was the lead prosecution attorney for a couple of cases that he lost.

 

I'd love to have Jordan as a political opponent. He's a loser like your pal, Trump.

You're upset. I kicked dirt on your boy.

 

You couldn't carry Jordans briefcase. He destroys woke lefties for fun.
He took down two fake impeachments by getting every Democrat witness to testify they were all hearsay witnesses.
While you cried in the corner over it and has you posting about him since you got here.
Owning woke lefties is his thing and you're just another perfect example. lol

 

I read it. It was an attempted shake down.

 

That he takes the people's business as a "fun" opportunity to "destroy woke lefties," according to you, says a lot about your type if thinking and him.

I can't think of anything memorable he said.

Jordan is a loser, just like "the Squad." I submit that most Americans are tired of the bickering, cancelling and getting nothing done.

Calling a guy who supports school vouchers, medical vouchers, stopping illegal immigration, a strong military, helping people based on need instead of race or ethnicity, etc. a "woke lefty" suggests your political antenna is bent to the extreme right.

 

So Nixon's impeachable offenses were not the purview of Congress? Preposterous.

 

How so exactly (or even generally)? Aid or military aid was never mentioned in the call by either party, as opposed to Biden's conversation.

 

Those acts are already criminal and being fully prosecuted by the proper authority. Why aren't they investigating why a riot was allowed to breech the Capital building when the leadership there had been fully warned about a huge crowd and possible instigators of violance may be there?

 

They were first investigated by the DOJ and findings and referrals made to Congress. THEN in the impeachment using those findings.

 

You said the Jan 6 committee was trying to expose criminal behavior so the public would know. My point was that congress has no business nor authority to do a criminal investigation. That was my point because they don't. Nixon's congress at least was looking at impeachable offenses (and Trump had already been impeached over Jan 6). In my view none of Nixon's offenses rose anywhere near the level of high crimes (like in my view none of the other impeachment inquiries did, with the very slightly possible exception of Clinton) but that is another matter.

 

We have a mutual cooperation treaty with Ukraine to investigate possible crimes involving citizens and officials of both countries and within each country. We knownthere were possible crimes committed and in fact they are the subject of a criminal investigation as I type. It was CERTAINLY appropriate for the PRESIDENT to insist on that cooperation and perfectly legal. There was never any menntion of withholding money or a threat.

 

I don't get your point. Yes, DOJ is fundamentally a prosecutorial operation (and an investigative operation with the FBI), but they are supposed to interpret and enforce the law with complete equity and fairness -- with a blindfold on if you will.

 

You can think of anything he has said yet you post meme trivia and leftist propaganda like you've been following his every word for years.
Thats what media indoctrination will do

 

Yes, that is the main charge of the Committee, as I'd said, and what they have been doing: to discover HOW it happened, the causes of the circumstance, so that strategies to be better prepared, and to avoid such circumstances recurring, can be recommended.

What omission are you referring to, in your post? For someone who likes to call for ample documentation, backing up the words of others, your own lack of any links or quoted references, to say the least, seems odd.

 

You're parsing words here. In the course of its investigation if there was criminal behavior on the part of the prez that is exposed (and there was), while Congress has no authority to prosecute, it is within their purview to expose it. Is Congress supposed to ignore it? It becomes part of their report in order to inform the public and to make legislative recommendations to prevent future abuses. It's their option as to whether to make a criminal referral to the DoJ. But you already knew all that. So why the obfuscation?

 

There is a plan, though the specifics are currently being held back, by McCarthy & the Repubs; though I think some have intimated about the things I mentioned.
My sources include Trump's main Economic Advisor, when he was President, Larry Kudlow:

Granted, maybe Trump's chief Economic Advisor has his head up his ass-- do you think?
All McCarthy has released in his "Commitment" plan, are Republican platitudes; why hasn't he released the details of the policies which will ACHIEVE the ends of his "plan?" Good question. No doubt, we will see those, after the Georgia Senate run off, and provided that Republicans take the House of Representatives (and McCarthy is elected Speaker, though regardless of who the 'Pubs choose, the plan can be expected to be similar).

 

Well, this thread didn't age well... This was always the democratic party wet dream. Sewing yet more division in the country that wouldn't bite, so, instead democrats are drumming the war drums in Poland. And that ironic....

 

So there is some SECRET plan to which you are privy.................................spare me. There is no Rep to eliminate SS or Medicare stop with the Dem scare tactics they don't work on me. And Kudlow is no longer a Trump economic adviser. All the proposals I read from Rep is about STENGTHENING Social Security and improving the results.

 

@Condor060 is not the only representative of that attitude, among Republicans:

Though, thankfully, I don't think that is the majority opinion, on the Right (for whatever it's worth, in the "For Republicans Only," thread's poll, Trump is getting destroyed by DeSantis-- but, as in the 2nd quote above, it seems largely due to the belief that Trump's chances of winning, are far less than DeSantis's).

That said, there are also those on the Right who advocate even more pernicious goals, than owning the "liberal media," for Republican politicians:

He closes, though, with a good point.

 

Did you think you were the first woke lefty to make fake claims then assign them to conservatives?
And here we all thought you didn't respond to off topic post.
Who'd a thunk

 

Around here and around the country. They're talking like Open Mouth Radio hosts. They mistakenly think people enjoy performances by Jim Jordan, Marjorie Taylor Greene and other extreme right yo-yos.

 

You can post all the (I hate Jordan) comments you want.
Problem is, nothing changes
He outed the Democrat hearsay witnesses in both fake impeachment attempts
And he outed Schiff for his behind the scenes depositions.
How many videos would you like to watch lol

 

Again, funny, after your emphasis on wanting to see hard evidence of what is in the "plan," to which I'd referred, which has been touted by Republicans-- you can look up the one-page release of their promises, devoid of all specifics-- that I need to ask you: links, to all Republican proposals, you read, about "strengthening" social security?

 

I'm trying to find one cohesive thought, in your post, without success. Why hasn't this thread aged well? What "was always the Democratic Party wet dream?

As for Poland, I heard the President's remarks, and can only ask, what gives you the clueless notion, that "Democrats are drumming the war drums?"