I am in a conversation with another and I made a claim of: Maybe someone read something i wrote 30yrs back and realize that the waveLENGTH is important to comprehend a transfer of energy between any points of time and mass. ie...... at least they are doing science and modeling nature, versus modeling QM can you post up who the people are that are actually capable of building THAT solar cell? and i was curious...... keep in mind, that my first paper was the PNC Theory in which, it shares the energy transfer between neurons at the synaptic connection is of a resonant energy transfer (a coherance of light, with the mass), versus the chemical potential exchange that people had been led to believe. Cal Tech responded with, 'per relativity, a photon cannot exceed the speed of light' and dismissed the submission for further review. It is what made me quit the complacent system. Note the coherance (resonant interaction) within the article. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/06/130620142932.htm I am bridging the concepts for any to see for themselves.
http://os.tnw.utwente.nl/publications/pdf/174.pdf there is a paper to read. and site tinkerers are the ones to watch On that paper notice the 'antena' is a 'field' of specific size for the matter. Real world application will always smoke the complacent!
That was not the comment; it was per relativity a photon cannot be slowed ie.... held upon mass Although, i will point out that t<0 of a predetermined outcome.