How is that "gaslighting?" Gaslighting: Gaslighting is a form of psychological manipulation that seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or in members of a targeted group, making them question their own memory, perception, and sanity. Using persistent denial, misdirection, contradiction, and lying, it attempts to destabilize the victim and delegitimize the victim's belief. Instances may range from the denial by an abuser that previous abusive incidents ever occurred up to the staging of bizarre events by the abuser.
If they fail, than they can blame the white people for being THAT oppressive that they forgot how farm. Were the people who bought Jewish stuff after WWII reimbursed for returning stolen goods? Nope. Utterly retarded to even suggest that people have to pay to get stuff returned that they own. Them white people profited plenty of what they stole at a the expense of making other peoples life miserable.
White people in the US don't give a damn that their economic social status they got in the US is thanks to legally oppressing black people till the 1960's. So no time soon.
No one should have their heritage taken away from them, no matter how much it offends another group. If they want to wave the confederate flag with the Cross of Saint Andrew on it, then they have every right to do so.
It's been well documented that the Jews ethnic cleansed 100.000's of civilians and stole their land. You tell me why some thieves get to keep what they stole and others must return what they stole.
I was not speaking to blacks in the USA. But since you did, maybe you need to learn blacks in America also live on land stolen from natives or if they got paid, not much at all for it.
Will you grace us with your proof? I suspect that the people living around what is now called Palestine are on land that was taken from them by either Arabs or in some cases Jews lost the land when Israel said they must move out.
Only the southern plantation owners who had to use blacks because whites and natives couldn't cope with the intense heat. The South was hotter then.
Do you really think the blacks in S. Africa were more miserable after the whites bought their land cheaply and they ended up as workers, or are they being aroused by demagogues to think that? Do you think the blacks were more miserable in Rhodesia, than later on when it became Zambabwe and they had to watch their children starve to death?
The problem is that they are romanticizing their heritage and demanding it to be displayed for all to be admired on massive pedestals. The other problem is that they can not accept that they get outvoted when their display is being removed. They got no rights to demand to be exempt from the rule of democracy.
has nothing to do with white people not giving a damn about that their economic social status they got in the US is thanks to legally oppressing black people till the 1960's. how about you present me a poll
The South voted heartily to depart the union and that is how to use democracy. Today Democrats whine about Trump not getting over 50 percent of the vote but applaud Lincoln who got 39 percent of the vote.
I do think white/jewish people took the property like they treated black people as their property. Nope. Not interested to feed some unwilling troll that doubts the Jews ethnic cleansed 100.000's of civilians in Israel like the best of nazi's who contest the holocaust.
Actually only the chiefs owned land pre white settlers, so all agreements were made with the chiefs only... this is still the case, the Zulu king owns all the Zulu lands Zulu king wants guarantee that Trust will be untouched in land reform https://www.iol.co.za/news/politics...ust-will-be-untouched-in-land-reform-17385320 The Platinum mines in Tshwane worth billions all owned by the chiefs.. it's the African way.. but the white lands must be expropriated of course Anglo American and China is behind the expropriation along with corrupt officials... South African court resets power balance between villagers, mines and chiefs https://theconversation.com/south-a...nce-between-villagers-mines-and-chiefs-106633
Whites normally commit crimes against people who have hope for them and are trying to help them out, family churches etc. Blacks rob whoever they can but don't have a lot of access to family members with houses full of electronics that may not call the cops on them. I have a lot of experience with gang members and criminals because I grew up in a corrupt conservative hellhole, Riverside CA. LA would tell the gang members and parents of up and coming gang members that they would arrest them every time they left the house if they didn't move telling them that there was low rent in the inland empire (riverside and san bernardino counties) and they should move there. This exposed me to a microcosm of different gangs and criminals, bloods, crips, a lot of hispanic gangs. On top of that we had KKK in norco and skinheads in the outskirts and the home of the hells angels as well as a lot of vagos.
Back to whether it's ok to fight for the rights for white people... just.... let me get on my soapbox... It's ok to stand up for your tribe, in fact shame on you if they need you and you don't. But don't make it racist... in fact the moment you cross that line you damage your cause. As long as your criticism is specific and valid... not a broad sweeping brush tainting an entire race, religion, gender etc... the extreme left zombies can yell and scream as much as they like... their accusations meaningless...
First, I never dismiss that whites commit crimes. But where do they commit such crimes? Would they rob the mess Blacks live in? What is there to rob? They rob from whites or course. But so do blacks. Blacks will gladly carry a gun to a home burglary. I can tell true stories about that. I have simply driven through Riverside and never knew what the community breaks down as. I suspect it is too many miles from LA to have those gangsters driving to Riverside. I have appraised many homes that blacks inhabit. If they paid a high price for the home in the first place, chances are the black has excellent taste and keeps a very nice home. I sold a home to a black professional football player and saw it later on a few times. I was dismayed at how he managed to convert a nice home to a dump and not take a lot of time to do it. i saw his parents home. They kept a very good home. I also sold his brother a home. And he kept up both very well. So it depends on the black. Even the family may not predict. I can't recall a decent home lived in by Mexicans. I sold one a very nice home of about 2200 sq feet and on a later visit noticed they were ripping out the carpet. I saw them destroy a kitchen floor. The house was good quality and the neighbors homes looked nice. I sold the home they left in Oakland Ca and it was screwed up too. I was fortunate a buyer wanted it.