After several years of engaging trolls like yourself, don't you know I am never affected by your poor attempts?
pointing out your claims are laughable, isn't trolling. And pointing out the fact that I've shown you quite easily why you are wrong about time, isn't trolling.
You have not shown anything of meaningful content to the discussion. Perhaps you do not understand plain English. Do you know what a chronological position on a time line is? Do you know a line is adjoined ? Do you know you can't pass 0 on a chronological time line without creating an immediate history?
I showed the length of time between now.............................now yes, it is a measurement of the distance of time. do you know that 2 points on that line indicate distance? Do you know that there is distance between now................................now? Thus crushing your "theory"?
Very good, ok I will agree with you. 2 point on a line mean a distance. So we are going to create this line below. A......................B Is this distance you are talking about?
Oh I forgot to contract the distance AB This represents chronological order, what does yours represent? added- Oh that's right , yours represent a duration of time in discrete packets.
There is no length of time between now and your next now, it is continuous on a chronological time line. Only now and the past exits. Are you not very clever or something?
(Read This) Do you know you cannot create a history without using the distance of time? In recent history I wrote (Read This), I did it between ten and 50 seconds ago and you read it. Between the time you read it the first time and the second can be found increments of time.
Did you know that you cannot displace a dot with out creating an immediate past geometrical position? The same applies chronologically. Let me provide you with an exact time model t←0 0 is representative of now.
well, shoe laces really aren't relevant to you being shown you were wrong. You have some intriguing ideas and a unique way of looking at things. And that's a good thing, but you are completely out of your league here and it's just silly to continuously claim you have proven Einstein wrong, when you can't even grasp the very fundamental basics of science, and you believe you don't need mathematics to prove your position.
You have no idea what science I know. I have already pointed out the universal visual contraction or did you forget that one? I have pointed out loads, you quite clearly do not have the intellect to consider my work. I don't mean to sound insulting either, I understand how complex and unique own ideas are. I will quickly tell you what gravity is, neutral is attracted to neutral , hows that for a turn up hey?
true, you've only demonstrated science you don't know so far. I seem to. Can you remind me? but your ideas have been shown to be nonsense. I, and a few others picked apart just one tiny example. Time and distance.
No, I don't remember. I participate in dozens of thread on this forum, not just this one. I don't remember specifically. Please at least link me to that post. And yes, your ideas have all been pulled apart. The simplest was time and distance.
As seems usual for you, it is important to ignore refutation of your imaginings and create new ones in an attempt to distract from the ineptitude you represent. Instead....please address my post with rational thought vs. inane and pointless artificial maths.
That is a strange assumption. History is no more than memories and does not exist as a distance. It exists as an amount of data recorded. For example look at the history of science, the entire data of it existing now in the present with the only ''length'' existing being the amount of storage space. Perhaps you do not understand that only now exists, forward geometrical positions are the ''future'', past geometrical position are the ''past''. When you look out into space you are seeing now and when you look back you are still seeing now. So yes you can create a history with no length because the history is amount of storage used.
Ok let us start with something more simple. There is no arrow of time, time has no direction and has 0 dimensions.
I do understand that this is what you believe, I also KNOW it is inaccurate. Rather than risk being labelled a troll I will simply bid you good day and walk away from this experiment in fantasy correction.
Let me tell you a short story. A man rides a horse along a long bridleway. Half way through his journey he notices a sign that says halfway point. He continues his journey to the end of the bridleway where he notices an end sign. Now the man remembers the half way sign that is back there. However both the end sign and halfway sign always exist in the present. So the history he remembers is where he was a while ago, he did not create any history he only created a past memory of the present. I can prove it, not only do I believe it. However , no problem , thank you for the discussion we had. I wish you good day, it is a shame you could not understand.
