State Dept says revealing 'evidence' of Russian hacking would be 'irresponsible'

That's because the State Dept. is lying for the liberals..

 

What are you talking about? What dignity? ... It's hysterical. The whole world knows it....Especially after Putin invited the American diplomats and their families in Moscow to visit the celebration of Christmas in the Kremlin.

 

Perhaps the real reason for not revealing this information is that it does not exist, except in the mind of those who oppose Trump. The State Department never hesitates to show anything in support of Obama or Clinton, or leak secret emails to the public but they suddenly have self declared ethics about this?

How democratic of them.

- - - Updated - - -

Probably just as much the American MSM has the truth. That is to say, no truth at all.

 

I guess they still have sored butts until now.

 

Trump admits that the Russian hacking is real.

 

Wikileaks said the leaks did not come from the DNC guy who was murdered.

 

Assange has suggested it was Seth Rich, the murdered DNC insider. As far as I could find that has not been retracted.

And they said it was not Russia either.

- - - Updated - - -

Is that sarcasm or a serious comment?

 

Summary: "This a false attack and there is no evidence, but we've always successfully lied in past. We want to preserve the trillions of dollars profit (and our jobs) by maintaining and expanding the over 70 year long Cold War with Russia, intending to force President Elect Trump to submit that we have authority over him like the presidents before him or we will destroy his reputation calling him a traitor."

 

Both and you can back read to find out why.

 

He admits the possibility but unlike the democrats he does not say that it had any effect on the election. Nor does he deny that we also hack Russia all the time, interfere with the Israeli elections or any of the other elections around the world.

There still has been no evidence that the outcome of the election was changed in any fashion, which is even admitted by Obama.

Just another part of the pity party by lying liberals.

 

We need to remember the entire Vietnam war was started and justified by an open and deliberate lie by "the intelligence" community because they wanted that particularly $$ profitable war - falsely claiming N. Vietnam had attacked a US destroyer leading to the Gulf Of Tonkin resolution giving LBJ full power to go to war. It was only years after the disastrous Vietnam war was it admitted the incident never happened.

The Cold War with Russia has been worth TRILLIONS of dollars for the military industrial complex, war contractors, and global banks who rake in billions on interest money for nothing. They will tell ANY lie to keep the Cold War, the civil wars, drone strikes, air attacks and non-stop militarism all over the world continued.

All of this ranting about Russia is based upon lies and a rabid, absolute desire to maintain the now 70+ year old mega-Trillion dollar money making Cold War with the non-existent USSR.

 

People refer to modern liberals as liberal, but they are not what liberalism was in the past. Being a liberal, I see modern liberals as some kind of corruption of liberalism. There is so little in common with my liberalism, think JFK. Modern liberalism seems to be some kind of ideology which is disconnected from reality, making it a destructive force in any society in which it appears. My liberalism was about rational debate with the other side, modern liberalism is shouting down the other side, reminding one of some kind of fascism, authoritarianism, where there is no room for rational debate, or even the right of another person to hold different views. Modern liberals also seem to think that if you outwardly change a society, by enforcing their lack of values and beliefs upon the rest of the nation, that this will change the rest of the nation, turning them into what the modern liberal wants. Yet this was one of the failure of Marxism, which thought it could change people. It failed, for human nature will simply corrupt any such attempt, unless human nature is in line and complimentary to the changes sought. And much of these changes the modern liberals want to force are in fact contrary to human nature. And they are not astute enough to recognize such failures in the past, learning from what reality teaches. So they persist in doing what cannot and will not work But in the process they will create an authoritarian regime which is difficult to get rid of, once it is entrenched.

And lest we forget, the presidential candidate these modern liberals chose was a neoliberal neocon. Which tells me that modern liberals in economics are neoliberal, and in foreign policy, neocons. Both ideologies coming from the modern conservatives. So, modern liberalism is full of incoherences, and becomes irrational, which was not the case with a well thought out past liberalism. What is called liberalism today is not liberalism at all. But they hijacked the name, in the same manner as the homos hijacked the word gay. Which used to mean light heartedness, carefree, happy and not sexual preference.

 

Assad is buying oil from ISIS again.

 

And JFK stopped the CIA operation called Northwoods, where we would blow up an airliner and blame it on castro to warrant using our military to take out castro, and put a puppet in place. Now, just how the CIA would handle the NEWS in such an event so we would believe castro did it, without a doubt should be considered today with this Russian hack deal. You would need for MSM to carry the CIA line, while blacking out any contrary voices in MSM. If someone did simply question it, you would accuse them of working for the USSR. Sound familiar? Ambassador Murray has been in MSM blackout since he spilled the beans that he knew the American insider who gave the emails to wilkileaks. And yet some of us are dumber than a bag of hammers to believe what our gov't is telling us. I am embarrassed for my fellow americans who are such easy marks for the con men. Such wasted brains. So gullible. I wonder how many of them have been separated from their money by con men?

 

And their method of influencing said election was to expose the truth. Those dirty underhanded Russians.

 

If the intelligence community leaked that the Dems were hacked by the Russians, you can pretty much guess that a smokescreen for the truth. Sometimes you really have to wonder who "The Wizard" is behind that curtain.

 

If we believe the claims from the DNC and Clinton factions then it would seem to be a possibility.

 

For many, being a liberal in America now means pro-war, pro-racial segregation and pro-xenophobia for which the core agendas are based around hate, fear and destruction.

 

Again you have hallucinations

 

When Nixon & the Watergate burgled the DNC, Nixon had to resign or he would have gotten impeached. When Trump and his buddy Putin hack into the DNC, the President said "it's time to move on." Funny.

 

When Obama illegally used the IRS to take out the Tea Party leftists . . . cheered.

 

But was this the only guy that worked at the DNC? Have to do better than that.

 

I'm not saying he was in Prague when the dossier says so, but Cohen has been caught in a lie...