Sterotypinh in the gun control debate

And you never served a day. Are we done now so we can get back to the debate?

 

the main problem, to people like you, is the voting patterns of gun owners. We reject the BS facade gun banners spew concerning "gun control laws are crime control" Gun control was created to pander to low wattage voters who want something done about crime by Democrat politicians and RINOS who want to pretend to do something without upsetting urban blacks who see attempts to crack down on criminals as racially motivated.

when we gun owners blew the whistle on these schemes, liberal politicians became upset and started trying to harass gun owners with more and more regulations that only limit what honest gun owners do. Its why posters like you have admitted that you push for gun bans as political payback

 

Nope, I enlisted into the United States army on march 24 1989 as a 19k (armor crewman) did my basic training at ft. Knox Kentucky. Got stationed at ft Riley Kansas, Charlie company, 3-37 armor. Pcs'ed to amberg Germany, stationed at pond barracks in k troop 3-2 ACR. It is you that never served because a fellow serviceman wouldn't call someone out like you did without proof. Brothers have more respect for one another than that.

 

Ok. You got nothing to add. That much is obvious.

 

you are a gun banner and you argue for gun bans because you don't like the politics, attitude or culture of those who support the second amendment as it was intended to be interpreted

 

I replied but not as a quote. Check it out .

 

I'm adding the question, why should a hard working grandfather, father, husband, and decorated combat veteran live under the idea of someone who has nothing, accomplished nothing, and whose highest ambition in life is to hang out and troll gun owners on an Internet forum, ALL DAY, EVERY DAY? And post up your service record before I accuse you of being a valor thief.

 

Accuse away. LOL. You are free to do as you wish. As I said....you have nothing to add to the debate.

 

Your dad's military record is very nice. LOL

 

You are a valor thief. A disgrace. My dad is a veteran too WWII, but my combat experience is desert storm. I will be 47 in may, kind of hard to claim my dads status. You are still a disgraceful valor thief. Unless you post up, I will refer to you as that in every reply.

 

Have a wonderful evening. LOL

 

You mad bro? LOL

 

I'm not laughing out loud because you claim 10 years active duty service. That is something to honor, except you didn't serve. You are a valor thief plain and simple. Disgraceful! You should be ashamed, and if you think I would surrender my rights to someone as lowlife as a valor thief, you missed your guess.

 

Insults are a violation of forum rules

 

Stating your 10 years of active duty will bring curiosity to any fellow servicemen. Like when where did you serve, what was your rank, what was your mos. if you served, we are brothers. The fact that you clammed up tells me you didn't serve, and claiming you did makes you a valor thief. Servicemen enjoy sharing their stories. You don't because you don't have one. That makes you a valor thief.

 

If you are a valor thief, damn right I'm mad.

 

All you had to do is ask. 1983 to 1993. BU1. Seabees We build we fight!

Now don't you feel silly. LOL

Wait....I hear an insult coming. LOL

 

No, if you in fact did serve, I offer my full apology and respect. By writing on a forum, you don't sound like a prior service member. Navy tends to be on the liberal side so it is different than my army.but if what you say is true, thanks for your service. If you are lying, you suck! I am suspect because you claim 10 years when enlistment is in increments of 4 years. I'm not convinced yet.

 

Nope not lying. And no thanks needed....I did not join so people would thank me. But you did an excellent job illustrating the very point of this thread. You don't know me but were quick to label me and throw me in a group of people I don't belong to. If you learned something this was beneficial. I don't know you either which is why we should stick to our arguments....rather than make things personal.

 

You did 10 years, naval enlistment is in increments of 4 years. Yeah, not buying it. Benefit of the doubt goes to you. I won't call you out, you know what the truth is and that is what matters.

 

I signed up for six years and did one reenlistment. Man you are priceless. It was very hard to get into the Seabees at the time. I was in DEP for 10 months before I did boot in San Diego and then A school in Port Hueneme (Port who needs me!) Dude you owe me an apology but I won't hold my breath....Brother.

 

Bwahahahahahaha! Omg someone get me a defibrillator!

 

It is not a claim being made by myself. Rather it is an attempt to seek clarification of a term that has been tossed about with such casualness, that it has come to lose much of its meaning in discussion.

 

That was not the question as I asked for your definition as you made a statement where I could either assume a meaning or ask for a meaning, I asked. Not to be facetious but to understand the direction you wish to go.

 

System double post!!!