"Stop Hiding Behind the Second Amendment"

Nothing but non sequiturs? I don't resort to fallacies and claim I am in it for the "gospel Truth", either.

I don't ignore anything, unlike those of your point of view who ignore the first clause and 10USC311 merely to appeal to ignorance of the law.

Why not update your argument, or, do I have to "file a complaint" with a local, superiority committee.

 

Yes you d resort to fallacies.

the second does not say or mean what you are twisting it to mean and that is fact.

It is you making appeals to ignorance and willfully ignoring the amendment and what it states.

the second amendment itself proves you wrong and that argument is still valid and irrefutable.

 

yes, it does say what i say it means, simply because i say so. want to take it to a superiority committee for a ruling?

 

You are not an authority and you are wrong.

It says what it says not what you assert it means and the words prove you wrong.

 

The superiority of my argument makes me more authoritative than you. Your argument is simply too inferior to be taken seriously.

 

Your argument is the inferior one and has been crushed and debunked.

You are simply willfully ignoring the facts which prove your argument wrong.

My argument is proven by the amendment which you out right twist and pervert

 

Hold up now, the constitution was supposed to be re-written (according to Thomas Jefferson) every generation as the times changed and needs changed, yet, as usual, republicans want to cling to ancient archaic laws.

 

There's a mechanism for this -- see Article V of the US constitution.
Want to get rid of the 2nd amendment? Repeal it.

 

You only think that while appealing to ignorance of the first clause. My argument doesn't appeal to ignorance of any clause.

 

Call a convention of the states then. See how far it gets you. Lol

 

It is you appealing to ignorance.

Your entire claim is dependent upon willfully ignoring the entire amendment.

Your claim ignores the board of the amendment which proves you wrong and it does.

You are lying

 

Only the inferior have to lie; i have had a "policy of Truth" since my youth.

 

I guess perception is reality.

 

You have stated no truth about the second amendment

 

And he never will.

 

That and the lack of resorting to fallacy to make a point I don't have.

You need to cite the rules of construction, or simply be a "big inferior chicken".

- - - Updated - - -

I have stated every Truth about our Second Amendment; you are merely too inferior to recognize it.

- - - Updated - - -

I always do; hypocrites just always complain about it, regardless.

 

You have stated no truth about the second amendment.

The second amendment proves you wrong and you ignore that fact proving your inferiority

 

Not at all; you are simply too inferior to recognize it. The Second Amendment has two clauses; both are the law. There is no appeal to ignorance of the law.

 

You are appealing to ignorance of the law.

Your premise is predicated on ignoring the second clause making you the proven inferior one

 

In what way am I ignoring the Second Clause? I don't ignore either clause, because that would be Inferior.

 

You you are ignoring it because you are inferior and beaten badly.

And you know it

 

all you have is non-sequiturs; how inferior is that.

 

Wrong I have facts proving you wrong you simply run from them proving inferiority

 

You don't have any facts; all you have is appeals to ignorance of the actual law. There is no appeal to ignorance of the law and the first clause of our Second Amendment.

 

So you think your the first person who knows what the 2nd Amendment really says? Your argument has been tried by people who are much smarter than you think you are, and they failed. Why? Because they were wrong.