Strongsville priest posed as female minor to receive nudes from teenage boy, court records allege

Ah yes. Another homosexual pedophile hiding in the Catholic church ranks. Not surprising considering the current pope but will the church begin to crack down on these people? Its pretty obvious he had a history of possession of child pornography yet was allowed to continue as a priest in the Catholic church. Will there be a backlash to this kind of exploitation of children within the ranks of the Catholic leadership at some point?


According to Chardon Municipal Court, on May 17, 2018, McWilliams posed as a female minor in order to receive nude images of a teenage boy....

According to the criminal complaint against McWilliams, he was in possession of child pornography three separate times—the first instance in 2016, again in 2018 and then one more in 2019.


https://www.news5cleveland.com/news...CGDbNSsQPxf27bbX3JdWBVLy_9UkzNU1tUABiHV3MUEqY

 

Not counting this post or Guava’s response to it; I’ll bet a $1 this thread doesn’t make it 4 pages before he tries to argue with someone about Harvey Milk.
Any takers?

 

More trolling from a typical source. Ignore the subject and attack the OP.

I know its difficult to keep losing debates but try and stay on the subject mmkay?

 

What’s the subject? Organized religion is bad? I agree.

 

Or why all gay rights groups have not run full length articles and billboards denouncing this.

Ignoring the fact that the catholic church actively hides these people, moves them around within its organization so that they can continue to harm children, and push legislation to limit their liability. What a disgusting group of people that happen to also be tax exempt.

 

I got my #1 Homie (Desmond) ALREADY cued up (and ready to go)...

Anyway, as the OP, it is obviously horrible (and reflects poorly on the Catholic Church).

 

Not sure if I fully catch your drift. Gay rights groups are obligated to respond?
Billboards and advertising cost money. I don’t see a reason why a group not associated with the Catholic Church or this priest ought to waste resources denouncing someone whom they’re not related to in any way.
I agree that organized religion is harmful though.

 

Yeah.

The WORST Part was that he was just ordained in 2017, and the next year he was engaging in this.

 

No, that is always @guavaball’s stick, he tries to implicate all homosexuals as being pedophiles because they do not denounce every instance of child abuse which is particularly confusing seeing that most of the men that harm boys are self identified heterosexuals, usually married, and many of them are anti-gay rights.

Thread after thread has attempted to be derailed by the above rhetoric.

The Catholic church is absolutely to blame, but their members don't care and our government puts religious belief over the welfare of children.

 

Ah, okay. That makes a lot more sense. Thanks for clearing that one up for me.

 

McWilliams, he was in possession of child pornography three separate times—the first instance in 2016, again in 2018 and then one more in 2019.

And Ordained in 2017? Wow.

 

No organized religion that tolerates homosexual pedophila is bad. Was it that hard to follow?

 

Of course @cd8ed always fabricates this same charge and every time he does I challenge him to quote me where I ever said all homosexuals are pedophiles. And that's when he scurries away.

Its an outdated trolling tactic to get away from discussing the subject.

The only one attempting to derail this thread is you fabricating statements I never made. As usual.

 

Exactly AJ. While he was in seminary he had already been caught and they did nothing. Its clearly a blight on the Catholic church not protecting children from predators like this guy.

 

Yes. Go ahead and ask him to quote me saying all homosexuals are pedophiles anywhere on this forum, ever. It doesn't exist.

 

I said you attempt to implicate that homosexuals are pedophiles, I never asserted that you said “all homosexuals are pedophiles” — you are too good at skirting the rules to make a statement that would immediately be removed.

Reading comprehension friend — you should try it.

 

Again, direct quote me where I ever said you did.
I understand falsehoods are all that you have but stop lying.

 

Which you cannot quote me ever doing. Nothing has changed.

LOL 2 of my threads were removed on a similar subject you couldn't provide a single example to counter and you know it. Funny how that happened if I'm such a "master" of getting around the rules as you claim.

Coming from the guy who cannot prove what you claim about me is amusing. You offer no quotes or arguments I've made to support your fabrcaition.

Come back when you can.

 

Says the guy who never offers a single quote of me doing what you claim.

Your stick is old and unsupported. Come back when you can quote me doing what you claim.

 

You know what implication is, yes?

You are just lying about what I have said, proving it is as easy as going back to your dozens and dozens of threads about “homosexual pedophilia” or the hundreds of times you have inserted flawed studies to propagandize your narrative.

You must think everyone here are complete idiots to not see what you are trying to do.

 

I would but those threads get deleted, you already admitted this in post #18.

 

The homopredator priest problem ain't over. There's bishops and cardinals got to be exposed yet, too.

 

Far better than you do. Still waiting for you to prove it.

You call me the liar while you never support a word you claim about me. So typical. Thanks for proving once again when you are challenged to back up your false claims you can't do it.

 

lol The only things in those threads proved was that you couldn't find a single example to counter a word of my argument or my posts to you

If you did it then as you are making up here by all means quote me. I'd love to see it.

 

Ok sport, you have everyone fooled