Sugar Babies

Discussion in 'Women's Rights' started by WJV, Sep 25, 2016.

  1. WJV

    WJV Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2016
    Messages:
    939
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The first time I ever really thought about Sugar Babies was when I was 18 and my girlfriend at the time and I went to see the movie Jackie Brown. The Samuel L Jackson character in Jackie Brown has some Sugar Babies that he sets up with a place to live and I assume gives an allowance to in exchange for a sexual arrangement. So as an 18 year old guy I was thinking that that was a pretty good idea to offer loose young ladies security in exchange for sex but I figured that you would need to be fairly wealthy to be able to afford to do it. The Samuel L Jackson character in Jackie Brown is a criminal that can afford to do it and he has a super hot blonde pot head surfer chick Sugar Baby set up in a flat or something and he also has a young black junkie country girl that has just moved to the city that he has set up with a place to live in exchange for her being his Sugar Baby. So he has at least two Sugar Babies in the movie that the audience is aware of. So anyway I had never given Sugar Babies too much thought before seeing this movie and when I did think about it it seemed like a good idea if you could afford it. But I was actually glad when Robert De Niros character shot the hot blonde pothead surfer chick Sugar Baby in the face because she was just so annoying and that made me think that as nice as a Sugar baby would be there would probably also be downsides to them that would need to be managed.

    hot fonda.jpg


    But the thing is - how many men can really afford a Sugar Baby or two? There really isnt a lot of men that could afford Sugar Babies when you add it all up. You need to have a place for them to live so you need to be able to either pay their rent or own a place that that you are not doing anything with that they want to live in. Then after you have set them up with a place to live you will need to be able to afford to give them a decent allowance. So fair enough but now what do you get in exchange? I read a blog a while ago that was written by a Chinese female that had just had an offer from a wealthy Chinese guy that was pretty much the same as above where she got a place to live and an allowance in exchange for satisfying this guys sexual needs and she was considering it. So what I wondered about an arrangement like this is will the sex be unprotected? Because if not is all this expense really worth it? There is no way in hell even if I could easily afford it that I would waste a large amount of money like that on a female in exchange for sex with condoms. And if Sugar Daddies are out there letting loose young ladies live in one of their places and giving them an allowance in exchange for condom sex then in my opinion they are suckers and very stupid.

    So obviously Im not talking about paying some girl from a Sugar Baby agency a few hundred dollars to have dinner with you ( which is idiotic ) - I am talking about long term arrangements. So the problem that I see with the young Sugar Baby industry is that the role of a Sugar Baby is far too vague. I have seen business like SugarBaby.com advertizing on WSJ, Forbes and Fox Business and the big thing that the procurers always stress is that Sugar Babies are not obligated to have sex with a Sugar Daddy if they agree to go on a date with them. Obviously sex is the point and all parties are aware of this but the actual business SugarBaby.com is actually making things more difficult for the client than it has to be. Sure the procurer wants to attract non-prostitute-like females to the Sugar Baby industry and that is why he tries to make being a Sugar Baby seem as far away from prostitution as he possibly can but at the end of the day what he is doing is attracting young ladies that will be happy to go on a date with you if you pay them a few hundred dollars but they are just going to mess you around and waste your time.

    So there is a difference between a high end escort and a sugar baby but there is probably also some blurring of lines. With escorts you wont have any trouble asking them for what you want because there is escort terminology. The role and services of the high end escort is very specific and not vague in any way so it is very easy to negotiate what you want from an escort. If you want something intimate you can ask for a Girlfriend Experience ( GFE ) or if you want something more extreme you can ask for a PornStar Experience ( PSE ) and this makes getting what you want very simple and easy but with a SugarBaby they have it in their heads that they dont even have to have sex with you if you want to meet them and they assume that you are good with this. Now if you are a wealthy guy surely you do not want to be wasting time messing around interviewing and paying for dinner dates with god knows how many SugarBabies before you find one that is suitable and will agree to the type of arrangement that you are seeking. So in my opinion the Sugar Baby industry needs specific terminology like the high end escort industry has. They key to a better Sugar Baby industry is to develop the terminology. So you can easily ask for the arrangement that you are seeking and so the Sugar Baby knows what is expected of her.

    So the high end escort industry can help - and another industry that we need to take from is the porn industry. Like I said I am not interested in an arrangement that involves condoms because that is ridiculous. So with the porn and prostitution industries the girls are required to have regular checks for sexually transmitted diseases. And with porn the girls sign contracts. What I think the Sugar Baby industry really needs are long term and short term legal contracts. Say you have a back ended six month contract for a Sugar Baby that requires her to have very regular health checks for sexually transmitted diseases and also requires her to avoid having sex with any other person for the six month contract - or requires them to avoid any unprotected sex with any person other than their Sugar Daddy for the duration of the six month contract? A lot of workplaces require workers to maintain a certain weight in places like USA and stuff like this could be included in Sugar Baby contracts as well. You could even decide what your Sugar baby eats and how many days a week she works out. Another thing is how actors and athletes and different people have contracts that ban them from engaging in any dangerous activities and stuff like this could be included in Sugar Baby contracts too. With Sugar Baby contracts it should be easy enough to work out the perfect sexual arrangement with a Sugar Baby. Once this all gets developed you could probably even make up Sugar Baby contracts that allows the Sugar Daddies to trade the Sugar Babies with each other kind of like how professional sports teams can trade their players from city to city. Unless the Sugar Baby had a no trade clause or something put into her contract. If the Sugar Baby broke your contract you could sue her.

    So sure if you are a very wealthy guy you can probably already work something like this out but even with all the advertizing of the Sugar Baby industry in recent times and reports that there have never been more Sugar Babies than there are right now - clearly the pool of Sugar Babies is not nearly deep enough or very wealthy guys would not be trying to promote the Sugar Baby industry on the WSJ, Forbes and Fox Business and make it mainstream. The more socially acceptable it is for a young attractive female to earn income as a Sugar Baby the more attractive young ladies will be attracted to the Sugar Baby industry and this is a good thing because it will open up the Sugar Baby industry to the masses to an extent. What we want are nice middle class girls. There are going to be a lot of regular guys in the future that decide to put off buying that new car until next year and instead use that money to sign a hot young Sugar Baby to a short term contract. There will be many men that decide that it is far more sensible to sign a Sugar Baby to a long term contract than paying for a wife. There will be many men that decide that they would prefer to have a Sugar Baby when they are old than some kid that costs a fortune to raise and then wants them to pay for their wedding and god knows what else. A lot of people are going to want and have Sugar Babies in the future - and the bigger the industry is the better for everyone from top to bottom.

    Another thing that can help is media. I have written a book called Sugar Baby in my head pretty much and I just have to put it on paper. It is about a hot young middle class female university student from the country that decides to become a Sugar Baby to help pay for her studies and things rather than trying to work a horrid part-time min wage job while she studies. She meets a wealthy Sugar Daddy and signs a long term contract. And its about that. It turns out that she really likes being covered and secure and looked after. I havent read 50 Shades of Grey but my book will probably be similar - but on another level. The world really needs a good popular Sugar Baby book/movie right now to help normalize the Sugar Baby profession and bring it further into the mainstream. Songs from artists like Iggy Azalea and Charlie C certainly are helping but a lot more needs to be done and it needs to be done now. Lets get drunk on the mini bar! What we really need is for my Sugar Baby book to sell millions. If anyone is interested in optioning it send me a message.

    What else needs to be done to improve the Sugar Baby industry and bring it further into the mainstream in your opinion? Do you agree that developing Sugar Baby terminology and popularizing the idea of legal short and long term Sugar Baby contracts will be key to making the Sugar Baby industry as good as it can be?

    [video=youtube;vO62S3FK-7Q]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vO62S3FK-7Q[/video]

    In my opinion you feminists can do a lot to help make sure the future Sugar Baby industry is all that it can be. One thing we need to do is make sure our Sugar Babies are not being slut shamed by society for making the choice to capitalize on their desirability. Feminists need to continue to fight the good fight and make sure there is no slut shaming in society. We need more Slut Walks and more Slut Rallies. How about an annual Slut Convention? A Slut Bureau? What other things can feminists do to protect Sugar Babies from being slut shamed?

    [video=youtube;cEQ5QrbImGM]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEQ5QrbImGM[/video]
     
  2. tecoyah

    tecoyah Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    28,370
    Likes Received:
    9,297
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    A wife is cheaper and more dependable.
     

Share This Page