Supreme Court blocks Louisiana abortion law on 5-to-4 vote

You were the one who brought up the "wanting" do keep up with your own post.
"My post obviously meant that if one is poorer they are more likely to NOT want another mouth to feed."

Yes they are responisble for killing the baby in spite if the fact there are plenty of childless couples begging to take responsibility for the baby.

Who does in our society?

 

That only happened in your imagination...

Black women who had abortions are not criminals even if you think they are.

 

That doesn't mean women should have the right to their own bodies taken away...

 

And then you made some comment about black women having babies to make money.....make up your mind...are black women having too many abortions for you or not having enough??????

That has NOTHING to do with women having the right to their own bodies. FORCED gestation is slavery.

The ONLY one who is pregnant.

 

Absolutely. But it has also been used by a racist elite to facilitate the systematic genocidal ethnic cleansing of millions of black Americans.

Beyond that, the DP establishment has now openly advocating for infanticide - you know - mass murder.

"Proponents of the Virginia legislation argue the bill, which is similar to a law recently passed in New York, is needed to protect women's health. But opponents argue late-term abortions are rarely medically necessary, and the Virginia bill has provoked a swift backlash from conservatives. But that response was compounded by comments Northam made on WTOP radio Wednesday when asked about the bill.
"When we talk about third-trimester abortions, these are done with the consent of obviously the mother, with the consent of the physicians, more than one physician, by the way," Northam said. "And it's done in cases where there may be severe deformities, there may be a fetus that's non-viable. So in this particular example, if a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that's what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother. So I think this was really blown out of proportion."
CBS NEWS, Virginia governor under fire for comments on late-term abortion bill, BY KATHRYN WATSON, UPDATED ON: JANUARY 31, 2019.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/virgin...-kathy-tran-third-trimester-today-2019-01-30/

 

Black Americans historically have made up over 25% of the population of America. That percentage dropped to between 11 and 13%. That demographic change has not been an accident. The abortion rate for black Americans is nearly 4 times the rate for whites.

Per 1000:
Abortion rate for black women: 25.1, 390 abortions per 1000 live births
Abortion rate for white women: 6.8, 111 abortions per 1000 live births
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/ss/ss6713a1.htm#T12_down

Res ipsa loquitur. The thing speaks for itself.

 

You asked for a reason why black women would have another child and I gave you one.

That has nothing to do with what I said.

When there are plenty of childless couples willing to take responsibility for the child, responsibility that doesn't kill it?

 

It means they don't have to kill the baby because they can't or don't want to have to care for it.

 

Did Sanger say that racism and abortion were 'way bad' like Northam, Robert Byrd and most other racist genocidal Socialists/Democrats?

 

The millions of black American women and the millions of aborted black American babies are the victims of the dominant corrupt white racist political class and the structural genocidal program it created to reduce the black American demographic in the US.

"By 1919 the eugenic influence on the birth control movement was unmistakably clear. In an article published by Margaret Sanger in the American Birth Control League’s journal, she defined “the chief issue of birth control” as “more children from the fit, less from the unfit.”27 Around this time the ABCL heartily welcomed the author of “The Rising Tide of Color Against White World Supremacy” into its inner sanctum.28 Lothrop Stoddard, Harvard professor and theoretician of the eugenics movement, was offered a seat on the board of directors. In the pages of the ABCL’s journal, articles by Guy Irving Birch, director of the American Eugenics Society, began to appear. Birch advocated birth control as a weapon to “… prevent the American people from being replaced by alien or Negro stock, whether it be by immigration or by overly high birth rates among others in this country.”29"

https://sangerpapers.wordpress.com/2016/10/31/election-special-the-politics-of-margaret-sanger/

 

You gave me two. One, black women are murdering their fetuses in an act of genocide, and two they have babies to make money.

Both are racist statements.

Please show the law or mandate that says pregnant women must undergo 9 months of pregnancy, and all that entails, to provide other people with a baby.....


HINT: There is no law....pregnant women are under NO obligation to gestate. FORCED gestation is slavery.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
That doesn't mean women should have the right to their own bodies taken away...

Fine, IF it's THEIR CHOICE.

 

Do you agree or disagree that we should only want more children from the fit?
Keep in mind unfit parents typically neglect or abuse parents leading to lower educational attainment, more crime and eventually damage to others or incarceration at significant taxpayer expense.

People that are not ready for children both financially and mentally should not have them.

 

And unnecessary one. A red herring.

 

I didn't give you the first one and nothing racist about the second.

Why are you claiming one exist? Go look it up yourself. Or just another red herring?

Not even close.

 

So you think women having a right to their own bodies is an unnecessary right !!??? That explains a lot...

 

I did NOT claim one exists. SHOW EXACTLY WHERE I SAID ONE EXISTS...YOU CANNOT BECAUSE I DIDN'T.


YOU keep saying women should give their babies to other people.

I asked you to show a law that says that.....there isn't one so it's only your opinion....and I know what that's worth

So what do you call taking away a person's right to their own body and forcing them to gestate as if they were nothing more than slaves or cattle???

That is what slave owners did, forced women to gestate and the women had no CHOICE.

 

I did NOT claim one exists. SHOW EXACTLY WHERE I SAID ONE EXISTS...YOU CANNOT BECAUSE I DIDN'T.

And nothing prevents them from doing so instead of killing their babies.

Not even by your stretch. But then what you call killing another human life? Which is more egregious "murder" or temporary "slavery"? I did notice a VERY pregnant woman at the store yesterday I mean she was REALLY ENSLAVED by the size of the bump on on her belly. In fact saw a couple of these "slaves" walking around tending to their private business, spending their money enjoying their freedom to spend that money, earn more of it and go back to the homes they own in the cars they own............

 

I guess you may never know the meaning of the words "freedom of choice" or "the right to one's own body".

 

Oh I know these are terms the pro-abortion movement uses so they don't have to say "abortion" and that they in fact mean killing babies.

Which is more egregious "murder" or temporary "slavery"? You're the one who wants to speak in those terms.

 

Abortion abortion abortion abortion ...see , I have no problem saying abortion ...so you're wrong once AGAIN Abortion abortion abortion …..


No, abortion is killing fetuses not babies and I will not argue about YOUR word for a fetus. .


How would you like your rights removed if it's only "temporary"? Bet ya wouldn't like it....

Rights cannot be removed temporarily or they are not rights.....and certainly YOU claiming it's OK doesn't make it OK

 

a victim who has taken personal responsibility cannot be blamed for consenting to surrender and submission

that is why women who murder babies with lawful abortions are not guilty.

 

No you on your side just as you just did call it "womens health" and "choice" And yes the life killed in the womb is a baby as I have showed you over and over and over, and certainly those ones that are born and then aborted were babies.

Which is more egregious "murder" or temporary "slavery"? Make your choice you like choice so much. You're the one who wants to speak in those terms.

 

No, I did NOT call it "women's health" but that is what it is, what it involves.....and I call it abortion, abortion abortion....are you still going to contend I don't want to say the word ???


Is that sane?

Couldn't refute one word of the post of mine you quoted



FoxHastings said: ↑
Abortion abortion abortion abortion ...see , I have no problem saying abortion ...so you're wrong once AGAIN Abortion abortion abortion …..


No, abortion is killing fetuses not babies and I will not argue about YOUR word for a fetus. .


How would you like your rights removed if it's only "temporary"? Bet ya wouldn't like it....

Rights cannot be removed temporarily or they are not rights.....and certainly YOU claiming it's OK doesn't make it OK

 

The corrupt racist political class that targeted black Americans for genocide are the criminals.

"CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY, noun phrase

Definition of crime against humanity
: atrocity (such as extermination or enslavement) that is directed especially against an entire population or part of a population on specious grounds and without regard to individual guilt or responsibility even on such grounds
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/crime against humanity"