Susan Rice Ordered Spy Agencies To Produce ‘Detailed Spreadsheets’ Involving Trump

You mean like Bill Klinton and what was the meaning of is meant or Hillary when she said "what difference does it make?" Yeah got it.

 

Are you denying this is true?

 

That is the pot calling the kettle black.

 

______
"Michael Doran, former NSC senior director, told TheDCNF Monday that “somebody blew a hole in the wall between national security secrets and partisan politics.” This “was a stream of information that was supposed to be hermetically sealed from politics and the Obama administration found a way to blow a hole in that wall,” he said.
Doran charged that potential serious crimes were undertaken because “this is a leaking of signal intelligence.”
“That’s a felony,” he told TheDCNF. “And you can get 10 years for that. It is a tremendous abuse of the system. We’re not supposed to be monitoring American citizens. Bigger than the crime, is the breach of public trust.”
Waurishuk said he was most dismayed that “this is now using national intelligence assets and capabilities to spy on the elected, yet-to-be-seated president.”
“We’re looking at a potential constitutional crisis from the standpoint that we used an extremely strong capability that’s supposed to be used to safeguard and protect the country,” he said. “And we used it for political purposes by a sitting president. That takes on a new precedent.”"

Source: http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/03/s...d-spreadsheets-involving-trump/#ixzz4dFarV5yX

 

Seems most of these leaks are coming from inside the WH. How many Democrats does Trump have working for him?

 

The White House Payroll [http://westwing.bewarne.com/discontinuity/payroll.html]

• The White House Office (Including the Office of Policy Development) - 568
• The National Security Council staff - 190
• The Office of the Vice President - 98
• The 45 percent of the Office of Administration that directly supports the White House - 91
• The Executive Residence (Including National Park Service staff regularly on the grounds) - 129
• The Military Office - 1,300
• US. Secret Service: Uniformed Division (White House Police) - 500
• Presidential Protective Detail - 100
• Vice Presidential Protective Detail - 100
• White House Technical Security - 100
• Engineering and Maintenance (From the General Services Administration, the Telephone Company) - 190

Full-time Total - 3,366

The above is the number of federal career employees that work in the administrative offices of the White House. To claim that each of them is non-partisan and would not be leaking information would have to be a leap of faith.

 

The numbers speak for themselves.
Nearly 3,400 possible agents within the White House all leaking information designed to undermine Trump.

How many times was Barry Hussein Obama troubled by inside information being blabbed to the press?
I can't think of one single time! It is absolutely essential that the leakers be found and prosecuted.

 

She was doing her job. Too many Trump campaign/family members were in contact with Russian officials during the same time Russia attempted to interfere with our election.

No wrong doing will come out of this. You can bookmark this.

 

have you paused to consider WHY Obama didn't have any leaks and Trump has fire hose proportion problems? Apart from it all being a democratic plot that is?

 

Is Obama still on his island?

 

If this is true, I'm going to be buying stock in adult diapers.

 

Yep. Collusion to rig the election for Clinton.

 

Imagine how angry they were about that.

The worlds greatest spy industry, and they still couldn't find anything to take him down.

 

The democrat plot part says it all, just about.

I can't imagine a President Hillary having entire phone call transcripts leaked to the press, for instance.

 

And I can't imagine stonewalling an investigation into who would leak President Hillary's phone call transcripts, or that of her allies. Nope, it'd be a "vast right wing conspiracy" that she and her friends would order be taken down from the top.

Congress wouldn't even BEGIN to reproach Hillary the same way they have the President. And they know it.

 

There the names of Clapper and Brennan pop up again. They were all for giving Robert Mueller license for a carte blanche jihad
against Trump and here they are again as recipients of details of politicized unmasking by Susan Rice.

It's Trump vs. the Deep Statists and Trump makes it difficult to root for him but it's even more difficult to cede control of the government
to a cabal of anti democratic lying bureaucrats.

 

______
Not any longer. Progressives have given him the all's clear.

 

Yes, I do understand that you express your outrage and frustration that everything is a democrat plot. I also recognize your need to reinforce that with fallacious hypothetical irrelvant partisanism.

Granted NO other president's administration has leaked like this one. Its just another sign of all that winning you must be getting sick of.

 

"Not everyone agrees that what Rice did was improper. She was after all receiving much new intelligence about Russia's role in the election, some of which suggested coordination with Trump associates. National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster has concluded that Rice did nothing wrong, according to two U.S. intelligence officials who spoke to me on condition of anonymity. That might explain why Trump has yet to declassify more information on the prior administration's unmasking requests."
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-08-03/you-can-thank-leakers-for-new-russia-sanctions

 

The republicans are experts at "no their there there" conspiracies as the past 7 years or so has demonstrated.

 

Okay. You convinced me (no, not really).

Go ahead and name another administration that has faced remotely comparable resistance from entrenched media/statists factions entrenched within government trying to nullify a legally elected president. I'll be waiting....not that you can do it.

No one in the Trump administration leaked actual transcripts of phone calls from Trump to Mexico and Australia, for instance.
It's an incredible breach of trust and ethics and makes it impossible for any president to do his job when everything he discusses
and plans is liable to show up on the front page of the Washington Post the next day.
No foreign leader will want to negotiate in such a media goldfish bowl atmosphere. And you know it.

 

Because the government is full of Communist.

 

With appointments like H.R. McMaster who needs enemies?

If Rice did indeed receive "much new intelligence, some of which suggests coordination with
Trump associates by Russians " where's the beef? Are Rice and the statists suddenly shy about releasing such information that would undoubtedly blacken his eye once more? I think not!

 

Same reason why the press treated him like a faultless God for the better part of eight years. Everyone (the left) wanted to see Obama succeed.

 

______
That depends on what the definition of is, is according to William Jefferson Clinton... Is the release and improper use of National Security data on individuals, illegal, and treasonous if it leads to the death of said individual? I know that may seem extreme, however, when it becomes a political issue there are many aspects to just how far access to National Security information may be shared. Did Susan Rice access National Security data on Republican presidential candidates and their surrogates for political reasons? Did that information include data on Seth Rich too?