I don't know why you are associating Christianity with democracy. Most Christian nations have been monarchies till recently. Not really. It's a defense mechanism. An immune reaction to a virus, if you will. Me neither. That's why I wish to keep different cultures apart. But... I do support mass killings under certain conditions. http://www.politicalforum.com/index...e-us-terrorist-attack.507450/#post-1067620146
You supported Canell saying by saying his position was understandable and trying to equate this with Israel. Ethnic hatred and Israel's colonisation of Palestine are two completely different things. You however have been trying to exploit a terrorist act in the UK to equate it with the Israel/Palestine conflict. You are wrong and if you continue this I am going to report you for continuing to take a thread which is about a terrorist attack in London off topic to one of the Israel/Palestine conflict. I am in no tough spot but most certainly irritated by someone trying to take a thread about a terrorist attack in London off topic and onto the Israel/Palestinian conflict, engaging in personal attacks and supporting hatred of an ethnicity.
Best thing to do. Now they can get any confederates, anyone who may have been in on it will be hung, drawn and quartered, the BBC will prioritise police raids on the evil white men, it'll be blanket coverage for the next month.
Exactly the Nazis described Jews in exactly the same way...but not to worry you have a Jew on this thread supporting you and understanding why you feel this way towards Muslims. No doubt there will be more. anyone who still has a problem in seeing the similarity to 1930's Germany needs there head looking into.
Islamism is political Islam, the desire for an Islamic caliphate / empire, as mandated by their God. As a fellow atheist, you're right, the idea of a "vengeful God" is such rampant, ignorant bullshit. Obviously a superior being would be...superior. Not a war monger. But that's asshatted religionists for you.
No I didnt, I suggested you support his right to understand terror since you do in another place, and that's the relevance of Israel to terror in Europe. my opinion is that terror should not be understood in any case - and I said that in my other replies as well. I said YOU could understand him if he understands terror, I dont understand either of you which is why I asked you questions. Oh, I thought you were irritated because I'm Israeli. rest assured that my reference to Israel is very related, I did not personaly attacked you and I hate no one.
Well according to Alexa, the attacks on Muslims are increasing and that they have been going on for some time. The BBC, The Guardian and all those other British Newspapers and Media outlets are deliberately hiding this from the entire planet.
You applaud this? Sick. And who are you to determine who lives where they6 do or don't 'belong'? Racist idiots don't 'belong' anywhere. Not that I'm pointing fingers, you understand? You probably don't...
It does not have to be mentioned, it is a natural consequence of living as free men following the spirit and having no respect of persons (favoritism).
And what 'is' the West, in your opinion? A bastion of peace, prosperity and freedom from conflict and religious stupidity? What am I forgetting?
Not really. Nobody. And that's the point. But perhaps you prefer that globalist would determine who would live where and shove multiculturalism down our throats?
They are? Here's the Guardian, deliberately hiding these attacks from the whole planet:https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...increase-fivefold-since-london-bridge-attacks
You live in a multicultural country-assuming you're an American. Your country deliberately imported a multitude of foreign cultures. Your country was built on immigration and immigrant labour, probably including you. Everyone in America has immigrant ancestry. And don't you forget it.
No, you are wrong. I am an European and that's why I take this so seriously. I just don't want to be run over or enslaved by savages. It's that simple, you know.
If it was not an accident, or mental illness, then it is a terrorist attack, you must blame on "liberals" who said terrorists are "playing by t he rules of warfare." You can start by condemning this terrorist supporter: “DUBLIN, Ireland -- Former President Jimmy Carter accused the U.S., Israel and the European Union on Tuesday of seeking to divide the Palestinian people by reopening aid to President Mahmoud Abbas' new government in the West Bank while denying the same to the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip. Carter, a Nobel Peace Prize winner who was addressing a human rights conference in Ireland, also said the Bush administration's refusal to accept Hamas' 2006 election victory was ‘criminal.’" http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/20/AR2007062000233.html
Why are you making things up. Anti-Muslim hate crimes increase fivefold since London Bridge attacks https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...increase-fivefold-since-london-bridge-attacks http://www.independent.co.uk/News/u...h-market-stabbing-terror-police-a7777451.html Mentioned this morning on the BBC with respect to this terror attack. The Cobra Meeting has finished https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...-casualties-collides-pedestrians-live-updates
Having trouble with the sarcasm I see. Oh and I did see that one from the Guardian that the Muslim London Mayor had put out.
No it is as a consequence of fighting against tyranny, such as the christian church, but the basic idea originates in Athens. (or at least that is where it is first recorded). It is not in the bible because desert tribesmen never thought of it.
Next thing you will be telling me that Islam is not a savage and barbaric religion, and Sharia law is wonderful stuff, eh? Please, spare me this drivel.