The Benghazi sham being employed by the GOP is pathetic and will backfire

What a idiotic way of looking at things. But the elites who count on divide and conquer, count on your over simplistic point of views.

Good job buddy.

 

Well, you Republicans could take the lead in all of this. Start a real investigation into 9/11, then you can have some credibility when demanding an investigation into Benghazi. Dems just following the Republicans lead here so, I don't understand the confusion.

 

When you come up with an alternative to the official story that is at least plausible then we can talk about reopening 9/11. To date you and yours haven't even been close.

 

So, I'm a republican because I disagree with you? Hate to break it to you sonny, I've never been apart of the GOP. Next, nobody takes you and your halfcocked conspiracy seriously.
Lastly, people like you are the reason corruption and abuse of power runs rampant in government.

 

Questions for you: On 9/11/2001 Bush was reading a book to second grade class in Sarasota, Florida. He was pulled to the make-shift Operation center that had been set up in the school, and informed of the attack. Bush then returned to the class and finished the book before running out the door to head back to DC. Do you remember the Liberal Media's reaction to that? They blasted him for it.

On the eleventh anniversary of that attack, the US was attacked again. This time the attack came at the US Consultant in Benghazi. Obama was at the White house when he found out about the attack. What did he do? He told Panetta and Clapper to handle it, and went to bed.

So here is the question. If Bush is blasted for not wanting to scare a second grade class, then why shouldn't we hold Obama accountable going to bed instead of doing his job?

 

Thank you. Dancing Jews, missiles, planted explosions, and unmanned airplanes ain't cutting it.

 

I disagree with this analogy. Why? The talking points were changed so many times that Susan Rice was told by someone higher up, most likely Hillary, to go out and deceive our nation.

When Hillary said, "What difference does it make, yada yada, I about fell on the floor. She received that early morning call and did nothing.

It was Obama that left to go campaign the very next morning when he should have taken action through the night. It's pure bull(*)(*)(*)(*) that he wasn't capable of getting help to our Ambassador. He isn't a leader and can't deal with foreign issues and Hillary won't cut the Democrats throats. She wants to run for President but with her snarky, unacceptable testimony of lies, I hope this hurts her.

ABC caught on so it's not just fox reporting about this. People died and at the ceremony of the burial Hillary still mentioned the stupid video which we know was a lie. The protest in Egypt had nothing to do with this terrorist attack. Period.

 

Why not bring up Watergate and Nixon to the mix?

 

I am sick and tired of hearing the left say it's a political move by Republicans.
Obama and company has covered so many scandals. Fast and Furious all the way to Pelosi lying about her knowledge of water boarding.

Now Obama wants to use drone attacks on Libya. Wtf? A day late and a dollar short? That's another sore subject for me. They claimed they lacked funding for additional help.

Let's face it. Obama is a socialist and he is in bed with the Muslim Brotherhood which he sends millions to Egypt every year. Yet, when for weeks Ambassor Stevens was begging the State Dept.for help, he was denied it.

Just read this article about his plans for drone attacks. It makes me sick. What did he do when Egypt was up in arms with riots and murders for months? Nothing.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/oct/03/obama-libya-embassy-attack

 

The Left Wing are in power now - why haven't you launched another investigation?

 

The cover-up is over the fact that we armed the Libyan rebels, and are currently arming the Syrian rebels.
The cover-up is that Ansar al-Sharia is made of the Libyan rebels... and Syrian.
The cover-up is that US weapons were provided to our enemy so Obama could go pew pew pew, and get the Gadhaffi regime out of power.
The cover-up is that we are doing the exact same thing in Syria with Assad, despite the disaster we should have learned from with the Mujihadeen... while trying to handle the fact that between our weapons and the caches from the Gadhaffi military after the fall... we have put tens of thousands of extremely dangerous weapons in the hands of the enemy... including 15,000 MANPADs which can be used against commercial airliners.

Basically, the cover-up is that AQ has morphed into a middle east hydra under the umbrella of AaS... and we are shoveling the worst conventional weapons at them in droves. Under Obama, the worst Islamic terrorist threat in history has organized... and we are arming them.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/06/w...-into-islamist-hands.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/15/world/africa/15libya.html?_r=0
http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/al-qaeda-announces-an-islamic-state-in-syria
http://sana.sy/eng/22/2012/09/14/441552.htm
http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/uk_news/National/article1173125.ece

Not to mention the rendition and interrogation involved in getting these weapons back.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...hink-the-cia-had-taken-prisoners-in-benghazi/
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/glen-...-intel-mission/story?id=17229037#.UZKeBhzypRQ

 

There has never been a cover up on the democratic side. There is however a cover up, to create a cover up for the democrats by the republicans, so they can use as a punching bag to go after Obama and Clinton.. And it continues to be so 9 months after it happened, with no governing in sight.

 

See above.

 

I think they did. It's called 9/11 and the excuse we needed to go to war with Iraq. Otherwise known as Hubris.

 

Ah ha ha ha.....

BWAH ha ha ha.....

I don't even know where to begin with this.

I'm speechless - perhaps for the first time ever on a political forum.

LMAO.

- - - Updated - - -

O rly?

Last I checked, funding and arming the enemy is called treason.

 

1. Did President Obama authorize a covert operation to gather up weapons from Libya and ship them to Syria?

answer: yes he did. In violation of multiple international laws and treaties, including the Geneva Conventions.

2. Were those weapons destined at least in part for al-Nusrah, which is a declared sibling of Al Qaeda?

answer: yes they were. The United States was funding, arming, and training al-Nusrah up until December 2012, when they suddenly and mysteriously appeared on the State Department's "terror list". Chew 'em up and spit 'em out, right Hillary?

3. Is Al Qaeda our declared enemy?

answer: yes they are. They declared war on us, and attacked our nation on our sovereign soil.

Therefore, our President spent taxpayer money to arm the enemy, and he knew full well what he was doing when he did it.

 

Did he do the same thing with Libya? Yes he did

Did he arm the very rebels who attacked our embassy? Yes he did.

Is Ansar al-Sharia affiliated with AQ? Yes it is.

wikipedia disambiguation

Arriving on the scene in 2011. AaS is the new AQ... uniting all Jihadists under Sharia law, ignoring their differences. Every terrorist/insurgent militant Islamist group is now united under the AaS flag, like the federal government... each maintaining their old affiliations... like free states.

For instance in Yemen, they are mostly Aden-Abyan Islamic Army and AQ. You may remember them from the USS Cole bombing.
In Libya they are mostly Abu Obayda Bin Aljarah Brigade, Malik Brigade, and the February 17th Brigade and AQ.
In Syria? You guessed it... al-Nusrah and AQ.

AQ has not gone away. It has franchised.

and we are arming them to the TEETH!

 

Translation: How dare those mother (*)(*)(*)(*)ing cracker head GOPigs try and beat up on my brutha Obama! It may be time to place the race card again if my home boy gets caught in any more lies.

 

A class act, you are not.

 

I say first things first. Lets do an investigation of the twelve or so embassies that experienced attacks where people were killed on Bush's watch.

 

While some are living in their world of convenient misinformation, discussing White House talking point emails that mean nothing, that Fox News took the opportunity to run with, while those emails were actually talking about talking points. The right will do anything for a scandal.

But talk about misinformation from the right. And this guy is the Messiah of the right; http://video.msnbc.msn.com/all-in-/51885271#51885271

 

What I see above needs some white out and replaced with, scandal, scandal, scandal. Lets talk about jobs, jobs, jobs.

 

Your priorities are somewhat askew.

Do you understand that there are 15,000 missing MANPADs? Do you understand that our government provided the terrorists with enough armament to overthrow a military dictatorship, with no understanding of its weapons stockpile, or who was getting the weapons?

Do you get that they had no idea that AQ had morphed into a very different network entirely, and are NOW in receivership of ever more weapons in Syria?

We are supporting terrorism all over the AP. It is guaranteed that the weapons used to attack the DO and the annex were either weapons given to them by us, or weapons we made no effort to secure from a military dictatorships stockpile.

 

Nobody with any common sense and a decent IQ can smell many things afoul in the BS story of 9/11. Those that choose to ignore it, are just too lazy to look for themselves or CHOOSE to believe everything's "ship shape" because they refuse to consider the implications. I call them "willfully ignorant".

If you're not a Republican, why worry about your interpretation of my words at all?

 

Yes yes, I know. I have to prove beyond all reasonable doubt precisely how it all occurred, and if I can't, then you'll go with the story that you're unable to verify and give it a general pass on accuracy, authenticity or logic. In other words, you need blanket proof the BS story is is completely BS, while you accept the BS you require no explanations of. I got it, and I've heard it before you.