The FBI is a domestic terrorist organization

Read yourself... do you forget what you posted? Put your big boy pants on... you were shown the evidence..

 

Why would you attempt to bring down the FBI in order to protect a past president from the law?

That just does not make ANY sense ...

... unless you're an anarchist, I guess.

 

They have consistently given Trump a MOUNTAIN of deference and every opportunity to comply with the law on his handling of documents requiring security.

Yet, you still whine about it!!

 

The search warrant on Mar A Lago? So, isn't that part of their job description as Deputy AG? So, what in the hell does that have to do with your argument?

 

They do not.

 

Let Trump speak for himself...

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/108851592077264437

 

I think they do have a credibility problem. Here is some very recent polling data on the topic.

 

Good, I'm glad to see this.

 

Why is Trump being investigated by so many different law enforcement agencies? It's not just the FBI, you know.

 

Old case over audio tapes in Bill Clinton's sock drawer could impact Mar-a-Lago search dispute
Judge ruled in 2012 that a president's discretion to declare records "personal" is far-reaching and mostly unchallengeable.
video here
https://justthenews.com/politics-po...-tapes-bill-clintons-sock-drawer-could-impact

https://twitter.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1560234754292813827

 

Think The FBI Deserves The Benefit Of The Doubt? This Laundry List Of Corruption Should Make You Think Again

https://thefederalist.com/2022/08/1...st-of-corruption-should-make-you-think-again/

 

It seems that most Democrats have no problem with that as long as they're being used against their political enemies

 

Investigating Trump is .00000001% of what the FBI does each day to protect us. It's ASININE to judge the FBI on such an
incredibly small portion of their actions. It's asinine to talk of cutting their budget when cyber-crime is exploding in states such as Florida.
We need to be increasing their budget.

 

They fabricated the salacious and fictional details required to get the fisa warrant to spy on Trump's campaign.

Then you had Peter strock and Lisa Page. It's clear that they are totally politicized and they are all in the bag for the Democrats

 

Shall we count the number of Trump associates who have gone to jail? I'll take the two FBI dicks and raise you a half dozen Trump dicks.

What you are arguing is that the mob can't be investigated because not everyone the FBI has investigated has gone to jail.

 

No that's not what I'm arguing what I am arguing is exceedingly clear.

The upper echelon of FBI management is obviously politically biased

 

Go Project Veritas.

Project Veritas released a newly leaked document today provided by an FBI whistleblower, which shows how the Bureau classifies American citizens it deems to be potential “Militia Violent Extremists” [MVEs].

FBI Whistleblower LEAKS Bureau’s ‘Domestic Terrorism Symbols Guide’ on ‘Militia Violent Extremists’ Citing Ashli Babbitt as MVE Martyr
Leaked document is labelled as “Unclassified/Law Enforcement Sensitive” that is for “FBI Internal Use Only.”
Under the “Symbols” category of the document, “2A” is listed with the following explanation: “MVEs justify their existence with the Second Amendment, due to the mention of a ‘well regulated Militia,’ as well as the right to bear arms.”
“Revolutionary War imagery” such as the “Gadsden Flag” and the “Betsy Ross Flag” are cited in the document under “Commonly Referenced Historical Imagery or Quotes.”

https://www.projectveritas.com/news...-domestic-terrorism-symbols-guide-on-militia/
https://images.ctfassets.net/syq3sn...9c2c3bd2603faf3f36918459dab3f3/fbi1.jpg?w=800
https://images.ctfassets.net/syq3sn...fa36f79295f5e70a2c5eedd85f91e5/fbi2.jpg?w=800

 

Hey popscott, You're still investigating Hillary, I see. You're about 6 years late; do you realize that?

Are you out of phoney pro-Trump arguments?

OK, I'll give you a good one: Trump was right to take these documents to Mar-a-Lago for their protection;

You never know what could happen in the WH; one of these dumb staff people might have tried to flush them down the President's toilet!

No, don't thank me; it's my pleasure to help.

 

What part of the OP ""The FBI is a domestic terrorist organization"" and the FBI has fiddled with our last three elections.... Do you not understand?

Do you think the FBI and Hillary fits in there somewhere? You obviously have your liberal mind laser focused on the raid... when we are talking about FBI involved in elections ... try to stay on topic..

 

Another campaign money graber tactic. If Trump is charged with alleged crimes as a result of the search warrant, then he and his legal team can challenge the search warrant to which evidence shall be included or not. Second, the civil suit will go nowhere because ir is a matter of criminal law, not civil law. And third, Trump is not known for his legal mind. He throws this around like a boy in a tentrum tantrum.

 

You are grasping at straws here Popscott.

The FBI has not interfered with any Presidential Election. When Comey came out and stated that HRC is not going to be charged, that solidified the last 5% of the undecided in several key states that Trump won. If Comey had not done that, HRC would have won and we would have had the "stop the steal" campaign and possible January 6th type banana republic incident in 2017 instead of 2021.

But that is not interfering with the election under legal terms. The FBI is not deciding who is and who is President, they are simply doing their jobs. The timing may suck, but that is it.

 

Nothing that Project Veritas is releasing is controversial. RW extremism today has replaced the LW extremism of the 1960s, 70s, and 80s. Some of these groups are violent, extremely violent if provoked in the most minute reasons beyond politics. They hide on the dark web and use cryptic messages for those members who are in the group to avoid law enforcement on possible targets from judge assassinations to assassinating the president because of political idealogy. We are not talking about John Hinkley here sort of thing, or people not liking their candidate losing to another candidate. We are talking about people who have extreme violent tendencies towards people who are just doing their job, like a traffic stop for instance. Sovereign citizens, certain "militia groups" and others come into preview. This along with organized crime, foreign espionage on US soil, and criminal fugitives who commit and are charged in federal crimes. It is their job, and especially to the 2001 Patriot Act on domestic terrorism.

 

A person who is known to hype up the articles without any solid foundation. Yeah, really credible there, NOT.

Hint, if it sounds to good to be true, then it isn't.

 

Coming from the very someone batting a thousand on untruthful and misinformation... you are the go to person who would know..

 

Only the "last three elections"?
It would be hard to find any national election that the FBI has not "fiddled with" -- if anyone bothered to investigate.

“In 1972, George McGovern became the last candidate to challenge Hoover’s supremacy when he announced that if elected he would replace the clearly aging director. Sullivan recalled that agents were again ordered again to collect malicious gossip for leaking to the press. Ironically, many of Nixon’s Watergate-era excesses, such as the Huston Plan, were too much even for Hoover. He died anyway that May, six weeks before the break-in. Since his death and until this year, the FBI has mostly stayed on the outside of presidential elections, as the work of disruption and dirty tricks has been usurped by party operatives who can operate with less restraint than even Hoover could.”
THE NATION, This Is Not the First Time the FBI Has Interfered With a Presidential Election, By Jeff Kisseloff, October 31, 2016.https://www.thenation.com/article/a...-has-interfered-with-a-presidential-election/